Case law

Bank of Yorktown v. Boland

172 Misc. 885 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 3, 1940

The jurisdiction of the Board and the constitutionality of the Act were sustained in Matter of Metropolitan Life *887 Ins. Co. v. New York State Labor Relations Board ( 280 N. Y. 194 ). … As was said in Dun & Bradstreet, Inc., v.

Bar Harbour Shopping Center, Inc. v. Andrews

23 Misc. 2d 894 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 23, 1959

Cook, supra; Zelazny v. Town Board, supra; see Matter of Larkin Co. v. Schwab, supra). … Bank v. Board of Zoning Appeals, supra; Matter of Tartasky v. Larkin, supra; Matter of Turner v. Cook, supra; Hilton v. Board of Appeals , 18 N. Y. S. 2d 213; contra: City of Little Falls v. Fisk, 24 N. Y.

Hunts Point Terminal Produce Cooperative Ass'n v. New York City Economic Development Corp.

13 Misc. 3d 988 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 2, 2006

(Browning-Ferris Indus. of N.Y. v City of Lackawanna, 204 AD2d at 1048 ; see Conduit & Found. Corp. v Metropolitan Transp. … (Grossman v Rankin, 43 NY2d at 506 ; Browning-Ferris Indus. of N.Y. v City of Lackawanna, 204 AD2d at 1048 ; McArdle v Board of Estimate of City of Mt.

Dane v. Mallory

16 Barb. 46 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 5, 1852

(Brown v. Bement, 8 John. 96 . Otis v. Ward, 3 Wend. 498 . Langdon v. Buel, 9 Id. 80. Patchin v. Pierce, 12 Id. 61.) … And it was determined in Fuller v.

People ex rel. Swedish Hospital in Brooklyn v. Leo

120 Misc. 355 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1923

The general rule, therefore, is that such a board is not vested with the power to reopen and rehear a proceeding which has once been terminated. People ex rel. Smith v. Clarke, 174 N. Y. 259 ; Osterhoudt v. … Brennan v.

Bay Towing, Inc. v. Broderick

49 Misc. 2d 657 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 7, 1966

Copcutt v. Board of Health of City of Yonkers, 140 N. Y. 1, 6-7 ).” In Matter of Brown v. … However, in Levy v.

Second National Bank of Cooperstown v. Calvert

152 Misc. 884 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 21, 1934

(Lewis v. Smith, 9 N. Y. 502 ; Merchants’ Bank v. Thomson, *887 55 N. Y. 7 ; Emigrant Industrial Savings Bank v. Goldman, 75 N. Y. 127 ; Goebel v. Iffla, supra; Nelson v. Brown, 144 N. Y. 384 ; Anderson v. … Div. 676 ; Fern v. Osterhout, 11 App. Div. 319 ; Barker v. Burton, 67 Barb. 458 .) ” In Jasper v.

People ex rel. State Board of Charities v. New York Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children

25 Misc. 53 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1898

Inst, for Blind v. Fitch, 154 N. Y. 14 . … Inst, for Blind v. Fitch, supra, however, does not favor this contention.

Bartholomew v. Merriam

62 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 280 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1889

(Brown v. Knapp, 79 N. Y., 136 ; Fowler v. Mut. Life Ins. Co., 28 Hun, 195 ; Harris v. … (Paterson v. Ellis, 11 Wend., 259 ; Marsh v. Wheeler, 2 Edw. Ch., 156 ; Birdsall v. Hewlett, 1 Paige, 32 ; Loder v. Hatfield, 71 N. Y., 93 ; Bushnell v. Carpenter, 92 id., 270 .)

200 West 79th Street Co. v. Galvin

71 Misc. 2d 190 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 23, 1970

(Riker v. Board of Stds. & Appeals, supra; People ex rel. Swedish Hosp. v. Leo, 120 Misc. 355 , affd. 215 App. Div. 696 ; Matter of Reed v. Board of Standards & Appeals, 138 Misc. 187 , affd. 230 App. … Y. 126 ; Town of Greece v. Smith, 256 App. Div. 886 ; Ellsworth Realty Co. v. Kramer, 268 App. Div. 824 ; see Matter of Collins v. Board of Stds. & Appeals, 253 N. Y. 594 ; Matter of McGarry v. Walsh, 213 App.

People v. Paul

96 Misc. 2d 1085 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 17, 1978

Records of the New York City Firearms Control Board disclosed that the defendant registered two weapons. … Conversely, evidence obtained under the invalid severed portion of a warrant may be used under circumstances where the defendant would have no standing to object (Brown v United States, 411 US 223 ).

Rockland County Builders Ass'n v. McAlevey

55 Misc. 2d 695 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 18, 1968

The very recent pronouncement by the Court of Appeals in Seaman v. … There is the further criterion applicable, as held in Good Humor Corp. v. City of New York ( 290 N.

Kaskel v. Impellitteri

204 Misc. 346 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 13, 1953

In December, 1952, the committee on slum clearance plans submitted a report to the board of estimate recommending that the board approve the redevelopment plan for the involved area, which is bounded by 60th Street, Eighth … Y. 342, 348 ; Campbell v. City of New York, 244 N. Y. 317, 328 ; Kelly v. Merry, 262 N. Y. 151, 160 ).

New York Times Co. v. City of New York

176 Misc. 2d 872 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 10, 1998

(Doe v Greco, 62 AD2d, supra, at 501.) … Co. v Cohen, Stracher & Bloom, 65 NY2d 148 , 151 [1985], quoted in Matter of Drew v Schenectady County, supra, at 246.)

Dubin v. Muchnick

108 Misc. 2d 1042 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 14, 1981

Pape and all three defendants constituted the board of directors. When Mr. … That statement still governs (Redmond v Redmond, 42 AD2d 542 ; Tremsky v Green, 106 NYS2d 572 ; see Puro v Puro, 89 Misc 2d 856, 863 ).

Bloomingdale v. Bloomingdale

107 Misc. 646 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1919

Brown v. Britton, 41 App. Div. 57 . … (Williamson v. Brown, 15 N. Y. 354 -360; Baker v. Bliss, 39 id. 70.) ” In .other states the enforcibility of charter provisions limiting the transfer of corporate stock is recognized.

Meaney v. Keating

200 Misc. 308 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 23, 1951

(Fitzgerald v. Harbor Lighterage Co., 244 N. Y. 132 ; Larscy v. Hogan & Sons, 239 N. Y. 298 .) Since the board had acquired jurisdiction its determination must be deemed fully exclusive between the parties. (Shanahan v. … Y. 469 ; Graf v. Mazzella, 240 App. Div. 974 .) This being so, the award, until the board modifies it, must be treated by all courts as a binding adjudication (Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Hunt, 320 U. S. 430 ).

Beard v. Root

11 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 356 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1875

(Bank of Utica v. Ives, 17 Wend., 502 ; Van Etten v. Troudden, 3 N. Y. S. C., 604; Cary v. White, 52 id., 144.) But it is not necessary *358 that the agreement to extend the time of payment be in express terms. … This is precisely the case stated in the opinion of Judge Allen, in Cary v.

Bookheim v. Alexander

71 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 458 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1892

v. … In Joy v. Diefendorf (40 N. Y. St.

Cole v. Goldberger, Pedersen & Hochron

95 Misc. 2d 720 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 12, 1978

Betts v Tom, 431 F Supp 1369, 1377 , supra; but, see, Brown v Liberty Loan Co., supra, p 1369). … Brown v Liberty Loan Co., 539 F2d 1355, 1369, supra).