Case law

Denton v. Merrill

50 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 224 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1887

Dec., 574 : Brown v. Higginbotham, 5 Leigh, 583 ; 27 Am. Dec., 618 ; Jaques v. Marquand, 6 Cow., 497 ; Hutchinson v. Smith, 7 Paige, 26 , 33 ; Ontario Bank v. Hennessey, 48 N. Y., 545 .) … (Ferris v. Van Vechten, 73 N. Y., 123 , People v. M. and M. Bank, 78 id., 269 ; Stephens v. Board of Education, 79 N. Y., 183 .)

Kohilakis v. Harwood

29 Misc. 2d 800 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 16, 1961

. *803 Significantly, the decision in Shaw v. Topping (supra) is also determinative of the issue with respect to the requirements of plaintiffs furnishing a bond. … The court held that such bond could, however, be filed nunc pro turn- To the same effect, see Eith v. City of New York ( 165 Misc. 18 ) and Hoey v. Dalton ( 126 Misc. 194 ).

Gunn v. Bergquist

201 Misc. 992 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 8, 1951

(Doherty v. Matsell, 119 N. Y. 646 ; Belotti v. Bickhardt, 228 N. Y. 296 .) … (Town of Brookhaven v. Smith, 188 N. Y. 74 ; Hinkley v. State of New York, 234 N. Y. 309, 317 .)

North Country Development Corp. v. Massena Housing Authority

65 Misc. 2d 105 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 14, 1970

(Brown v. Mt. Vernon Housing Auth., 279 App. Div. 794 .) … (See, e.g., Brady v. Mayor of City of New York, 20 N. Y. 312 ; People ex rel. Coughlin v. Gleason, 121 N. Y. 631 ; Gerzof v. Sweeney, 16 N Y 2d 206; see, also, Matter of General Bldg. Contrs. of N. Y. State v.

Waters v. Connor

11 Misc. 2d 174 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1957

Plaintiffs next complain of the failure of the planning board to require monuments, etc. on the subdivision plot before approval. … It is only where a municipality’s contemplated actions are clearly without warrant of law that a court may interfere (Meth v. City of New York, 142 Misc. 203 ). There has been no such showing here.

Dean Tarry Corp. v. Friedlander

103 Misc. 2d 435 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 7, 1980

A parallel section of the Town Law (§ 274-a) was judicially construed, but only with respect to a subdivision not in issue here (Matter of Boxer v Town Bd. of Town of Cortlandt, 60 AD2d 913 ). … Indeed, the board of trustees need not create a planning board (Village Law, § 7-718).

Losee v. Dunkin

7 Johns. 70 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1810

In Furman v. … (Brown v. Davis, 3 Term Rep. 80. Brown v. Cornish, 1 Ld. Raym. 217.)

Kosmider v. Whitney

56 Misc. 3d 354 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 19, 2017

Ferebee, Chairman of the Board of Supervisors of Essex County (respondent Ferebee). … Kosinski, New York State Board of Elections Commissioner, as well as respondent McGahay.

People v. Riccardi

73 Misc. 2d 19 · New York Supreme Court · May 1, 1972

Brown, supra; People v. Spriggs, 60 Cal. 2d 868 ; dissenting opinion of Mr. Justice Holmes in Donnelly v. United States, 228 U. S. 243 , supra; Fine, Declarations Against Penal Interest, 21 Syracuse L. … Lettrich, 413 Ill. 172 ), the question remains whether, as defendant contends, People v. Brown (26 N Y 2d 88, supra) should be given retroactive effect.

Alexander v. Greene

7 Hill & Den. 533 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1844

(Mayor v. Humphries, 1 Carr. & Payne, 251; Breedlove v. Turner, 9 Mart. Lou. Rep. 353, 359, 380; Aldrich v. Brown, 11 Wend. 576 ; Hullman v. Bennett, 5 Esp. Rep. 226; Fitzsimmons v. Inglis, 5 Taunt. … Morris, Carth. 485; Gibson v. Paynton, 4 Burr. 2298; Nicholson v. Willan, 5 East, 507; Harris v. Packwood, 3 Taunt. 271; Orange County Bank v. Brown, 9 Wend. 115 .) 4.

Nash v. Hall Signal Co.

97 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 354 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1895

(Hodges v. New England Screw Co., 1 R. I. 312; Heath v. Erie Ry. Co., 8 Blatchf. 347 .) In addition to the cases above cited, the cases of Holmes v. Abbott ( 53 Hun, 617 ), Garner v. Harmony Mills ( 6 Abb. N. … C. 212 ), Gaines v. Chew (2 How. [U. S.] 619) and Brinckerhoff v. Brown (6 Johns. *359 Ch.-139) are authorities which support the right of the plaintiffs to maintain this action.

Board of Education v. West Hempstead Chapter Branch II of New York State Teachers Ass'n

63 Misc. 2d 335 · New York Supreme Court · May 18, 1970

Board of Educ., 391 U. S. 563, 572, n. 4 ) school employees may be required to follow prior to “bringing their complaints before the public” (see Matter of Tepedino v. Dumpson, supra, p. 709, n. 2). … S. 254 ) and its progeny, nor whether it can be the predicate for dismissal proceedings as in Matter of Tepedmo v. Dumpson (24 N Y 2d 705, supra) or Pickering v. Board of Educ. (391 H.

Myers v. People

21 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 416 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1878

Hasbrouck v. The General Sessions of the City of New York, 3 Barb., 144 .) Even if the order had been irregular, it could not have been questioned collaterally.

Bauersfeld v. Valentine

180 Misc. 705 · New York Supreme Court · May 11, 1943

Gerard v. Barry

92 Misc. 2d 957 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1977

On October 27, 1977, the petitioner’s license as a thoroughbred veterinarian was suspended by the respondent board. On November 2, 1977, Mr. … (See, particularly, n 20a, citing Byrne v Long Is. State Park Comm., 67 Misc 2d 1084 ; and cf.

Meredith v. Monahan

60 Misc. 2d 1081 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 30, 1969

The defendant, Board of Elections, claims that, 1. That the board’s duty is ministerial and cannot review the substance of the legality of the local law. 2. … (German Masonic Temple Assn. v. City of New York, 279 N. Y. 452 ; Rockland Light & Power Co. v. City of New York, 289 N. Y. 45 ; Shea v. City of Cohoes, 27 A D 2d 881.)

Durham v. Ingrassia

105 Misc. 2d 191 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 19, 1980

(See Hinkley v State of New York, 234 NY 309, 319 ; Town of Islip v Powell, 78 Misc 2d 1007 ; Allen v Potter, 64 Misc 2d 938 ; 63 NY Jur [rev ed], Waters, § 259.) … Des Fosses v Rastelli, 283 App Div 1069 , affd 308 NY 850 ; Knight v Ciarlone, 200 NYS2d 805 .)

Sette v. McCambridge

84 Misc. 2d 591 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 24, 1975

In his recommendation he relied on the "landmark decision” of Matter of Greenfield v Moses ( 169 Misc 389 ). … Greenfield v Moses (supra), relied on by the Hearing Officer, is pot applicable since it relates not to section 75 of the Civil Service Law but to former section 22.

Wintringham v. Wintringham

20 Johns. 296 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1822

(b) Vide Hendricks v. Robinson, ( 2 Johns. Ch. Rep. 283 .) Brinkerhoff v. Brown, Williams v. Brown, and M‘Dermutt v. Strong, ( 4 Johns. Ch. Rep. 671 . 682. 687.) Spader v. Davis, ( 5 Johns. Ch. Rep. 280 .) … Brinkerhoff v. Marvin, (Id. 320.)

Bazinet v. Kluge

196 Misc. 2d 231 · New York Supreme Court · May 29, 2003

In Mergler v Crystal Props. … Just recently the United States Supreme Court held in Brown v Legal Found, of Washington (538 US —, 123 S Ct 1406 [2003]) that since the Washington program only permits deposit of funds in IOLA type of accounts where there