Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnysupct

10,000+ results

1.24s

  • National Commercial Bank v. Gray

    24 N.Y.S. 997 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1893

    Baldwin v. Brown, 16 N. Y. 359 ; Reed v. Farr, 35 N. Y. 113 ; Avery v. Woolen Co., 82 N. Y. 583 . We are thus brought to a consideration of the evidence introduced for the purpose of establishing a practical location. … , Dorothy Brown and Eleanor Brown, heirs of Henry Hogan and Martina Brown, deceased, which said Nelly Hogan, Henry Hogan, and Martina Brown were and are the heirs of William Hogan, deceased, of the second part, do enter into

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Browne v. Horbar

    6 Misc. 3d 780 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 17, 2004

    Plaintiff — Tonia Browne, as executrix of Donald K. Browne, and Tonia Browne, individually — opposes the motion. Background In November 2001, Mrs. … Browne v Horbar This case does not require the court to address whether HIPAA in an absolute sense prohibits ex parte interviews of treating physicians.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Varano v. FORBA Holdings, LLC

    42 Misc. 3d 303 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 18, 2013

    {People v Brown, 48 NY2d 388, 393 [1979].) … Brown, 48 NY2d 388, 394 [1979].)

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Ottley v. New York City Housing Authority

    31 Misc. 3d 704 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 9, 2011

    Hernandez, 10 Misc 3d 1068[A] , 2005 NY Slip Op 52188[U] , *2-3 [2005], citing Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. … Such prohibited conduct includes the sale of drugs, either in the apartment itself or elsewhere on or in the vicinity of the NYCHA premises (Matter of Blanco v Popolizio, 190 AD2d 554 [1993]; Matter of Brown v Popolizio,

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • McQueen v. Babcock

    41 Barb. 337 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 7, 1863

    The defense under this statute is complete, unless the time during’ which the injunction, issued in the action of Adams v. … Brown, real or personal,” including the property mentioned in a certain assignment from Brown to McQxieen, therein mentioned.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Skidmore College v. Cline

    58 Misc. 2d 582 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 6, 1969

    Each board member and hence each board will be motivated, it may be assumed, by what is felt to be best for its own municipality, whether by reason of local pride, the financial or political effect of the annexation upon … For these reasons the finding of the Town Board of the Town of Greenfield is set aside and the said board is ordered and directed to find that the petition for annexation presented to the said board substantially complies

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Elmore v. Plainview-Old Bethpage Central School District

    180 Misc. 2d 762 · New York Supreme Court · May 6, 1999

    (See also, People v Joseph, 84 NY2d 995 [1994].) … (Matter of Salvano v Merril Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, 85 NY2d 173 [1995]; Integrated Sales v Maxell Corp., 94 AD2d 221 [1st Dept 1983].)

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Lyden v. Katz

    29 Misc. 2d 1072 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 24, 1961

    Feeny v. Board of Canvassers, 156 N. Y. 36, 46-47 ; Matter of Emmet, 150 N. Y. 538, 541 ; Election Law, § 335). … Matter of Cowles v. Board of Elections, 252 App. Div. 326 ).

    Reversed by Lyden v. Katz, 14 A.D.2d 820 (1961)Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Alexander v. Greene

    7 Hill & Den. 533 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1844

    (Mayor v. Humphries, 1 Carr. & Payne, 251; Breedlove v. Turner, 9 Mart. Lou. Rep. 353, 359, 380; Aldrich v. Brown, 11 Wend. 576 ; Hullman v. Bennett, 5 Esp. Rep. 226; Fitzsimmons v. Inglis, 5 Taunt. … Morris, Carth. 485; Gibson v. Paynton, 4 Burr. 2298; Nicholson v. Willan, 5 East, 507; Harris v. Packwood, 3 Taunt. 271; Orange County Bank v. Brown, 9 Wend. 115 .) 4.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hyde v. Clark

    179 Misc. 414 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 31, 1942

    The plaintiff, an unsuccessful candidate at an examination for admission to the Bar of the State of New York, conducted by the State Board of Law Examiners, has brought an action against the Chairman of said Board to recover … (Levine v. Behn, 282 N. Y. 120,126 .) In the instant case the plaintiff has submitted no opposing affidavit whatsoever.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Mannheimer v. Keehn

    30 Misc. 2d 584 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 27, 1943

    (Brown v. Pacific Mail S. S. Co., 4 Fed. Cas. 420 , No. 2,025 ; 5 Fletcher’s Cyclopedia Corporations, § 2072.) In Matter of Morse (Bank of America) ( 247 N. … (Hauben v. Morris, 255 App. Div. 35, 46 ; Gilbert Paper Co. v. Prankard, 204 App. Div. 83 ; Securities Comm. v. Chenery Corp., 318 U. S. 80 ; Du Pont v. Du Pont, 256 F. 129 ; Bisbee v. Midland Linseed Prods.

    Modified by Mannheimer v. Keehn, 268 A.D. 813 (1944)Cited 9 timesPublished
  • North Country Development Corp. v. Massena Housing Authority

    65 Misc. 2d 105 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 14, 1970

    (Brown v. Mt. Vernon Housing Auth., 279 App. Div. 794 .) … (See, e.g., Brady v. Mayor of City of New York, 20 N. Y. 312 ; People ex rel. Coughlin v. Gleason, 121 N. Y. 631 ; Gerzof v. Sweeney, 16 N Y 2d 206; see, also, Matter of General Bldg. Contrs. of N. Y. State v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • People v. Sturgis

    76 Misc. 2d 1053 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1973

    Henry would act as a lookout by going out to the street at frequent intervals to tinker with his car. .Shirley Brown, Gloria Jackson with whom Shirley Brown was frequently seen, Hector G. … Gloria Jackson and Shirley Brown were arrested several times when narcotics mills were raided.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Oliver M. Farrand Co. v. Farrand

    84 Misc. 234 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1914

    Greenfield v. Gilman, 140 N. Y. 168 ; Broadbooks v. Tolles, 114 App. Div. 646 ; Sander v. Hoffman, 64 N. Y. 248 . … As was said in Greenfield v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Myers v. People

    21 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 416 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1878

    Hasbrouck v. The General Sessions of the City of New York, 3 Barb., 144 .) Even if the order had been irregular, it could not have been questioned collaterally.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Gunn v. Bergquist

    201 Misc. 992 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 8, 1951

    (Doherty v. Matsell, 119 N. Y. 646 ; Belotti v. Bickhardt, 228 N. Y. 296 .) … (Town of Brookhaven v. Smith, 188 N. Y. 74 ; Hinkley v. State of New York, 234 N. Y. 309, 317 .)

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Denton v. Merrill

    50 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 224 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1887

    Dec., 574 : Brown v. Higginbotham, 5 Leigh, 583 ; 27 Am. Dec., 618 ; Jaques v. Marquand, 6 Cow., 497 ; Hutchinson v. Smith, 7 Paige, 26 , 33 ; Ontario Bank v. Hennessey, 48 N. Y., 545 .) … (Ferris v. Van Vechten, 73 N. Y., 123 , People v. M. and M. Bank, 78 id., 269 ; Stephens v. Board of Education, 79 N. Y., 183 .)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Kohilakis v. Harwood

    29 Misc. 2d 800 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 16, 1961

    . *803 Significantly, the decision in Shaw v. Topping (supra) is also determinative of the issue with respect to the requirements of plaintiffs furnishing a bond. … The court held that such bond could, however, be filed nunc pro turn- To the same effect, see Eith v. City of New York ( 165 Misc. 18 ) and Hoey v. Dalton ( 126 Misc. 194 ).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Falker v. New York

    17 Abb. N. Cas. 279 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1884

    —In Norton v. … See Norton v. Hughes, post, p. 287, note.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. New York Central Railroad v. Jones

    144 Misc. 776 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 1, 1932

    Brown v. O’Rourke, 31 App. Div. 583, 588 .) The relator, without evasion and in good faith, offered Coombs and Rockwell in place of Roach and Carpenter and vouched for their competency. … Co. v. Tax Commissioners, 55 App. Div. 218, 222 .)

    Cited 3 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.