Case law

District Council No. 9, International Brotherhood of Painters & Allied Trades v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority

115 Misc. 2d 810 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 1, 1982

For example, the contract was approved at an open meeting of the TA board on June 11,1982. … (Matter of Mandle v Brown, 5 NY2d 51 ; Matter of Holy Spirit Assn, for Unification of World Christianity v Tax Comm. of City of N. Y, 62 AD2d 188, 194-196 , mot for lv to app den 45 NY2d 706 .)

Government National Mortgage Ass'n v. Screen

85 Misc. 2d 86 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 20, 1976

(Brown v Lynn, supra, mot to reconsider den 392 F Supp 559 ; Federal Nat. Mtge. Assn. v Ricks, 83 Misc 2d 814 .) … (Brown v Lynn, supra, p 993.) The case at bar is clearly distinguishable. The instant plaintiff seeks summary judgment.

Hogle v. H. H. Franklin Manufacturing Co.

105 N.Y.S. 1094 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 24, 1907

On the line is a board fence six feet high. The space between the fence and the defendant’s building is not used for any purpose other than for the admission of light and air. … Per Brown, J., in Bohan v. Port Jervis Gaslight Co., 122 N. Y. 18, 26 , 25 N. E. 246 , 9 L. R. A. 711. See, also, Wittman v. City of New York, 80 App. Div. 585 , 80 N. Y. Supp. 1022 .

Manufacturers' National Bank v. Cox

9 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 572 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1874

, in regard to the agreement between Brown and the intestate. … Glassington v. Thwaites, 1 S. & S., 133. Story on P., § 178 ; Parsons, 224, 227, 228; Burton v. Wookey, 6 Mad., 367 . Coll., 186 Bentley v. Craven, 18 Beavan, 75; Struthers v. Pearce, 51 N. Y., 361 .

People v. Thompson

77 Misc. 2d 700 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1974

(Terry v. Ohio, 392 U. S. 1, 27 , supra.) The parole officers in the instant case had ample reason to fear that the defendant was armed with a gun, or even, as Brown ¡had intimated, with “ guns ”. … (People v.

Plattsburgh Boat Basin, Inc. v. City of Plattsburgh

50 Misc. 3d 271 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 24, 2015

Here, the Common Council did not refer the Mooring Law to the County Planning Board prior to its enactment. … The Common Council was therefore required under General Municipal Law § 239-m (3) (b) (i) and (ii) to refer the law to the County Planning Board.

House v. Schwartz

18 Misc. 2d 21 · New York Supreme Court · May 28, 1959

Brown, 192 Misc. 603 ; see, also, Kennedy-Ervin labor bill passed by Senate, 1959, prescribing minimum standards for trusteeships). … The two are essentially the same, as indicated by the court in Fayette Tobacco Warehouse Co. v. Lexington Tobacco Board of Trade ( 299 S. W. 2d 640 [Ky.], cert, denied 355 U.

O'Dwyer v. Grove Service Corp.

15 Misc. 2d 154 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 14, 1958

Brown and Allan Brown to compel plaintiffs to accept (1) the notice to counsel for the judgment creditors; (2) the sworn affidavit of Howard L. … Co., 117 Conn. 147 ; Bruyette v. Sandini, 291 Mass. 373 ; cf., also, Stolove v. Fidelity & Cas. Co., 157 Misc. 106 ). The motion is granted. Submit order.

Nichols v. Tifft

2 Thomp. & Cook 314 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1873

In 1861, one John Carter Brown held a bond and a mortgage on lands in Erie county, made by Aaron D. Patohin. … The judge who tried this cause in the superior court in his findings of fact says that a judgment was entered in the creditor’s suit of Brown v.

New York State United Teachers v. Board of Regents of University of State of New York

33 Misc. 3d 989 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 24, 2011

Board of Regents of Univ of State of N.Y., 44 NY2d 593 , 602 [1978]). … Petitioners challenge this provision as an intrusion on the collective bargaining process embraced under section 3012-c and outside the Board of Regents’ authority (see Moore v Board of Regents of Univ of State of N.Y., 44

Hoch v. New York State Department of Health

191 Misc. 2d 462 · New York Supreme Court · May 10, 2002

Brown. Mr. Brown do you have a copy of information from the person who allegedly purchased the cigarettes under 18, by copy of the driver’s license, I.D. and other information? “Mr. Brown: We have this in the files. … Larkin, 421 US 35, 46-47 ; Matter of Warder v Board of Regents, 53 NY2d 186, 197 ; State Administrative Procedure Act § 303)” (Matter of 1616 Second Ave.

Pearson v. Lovejoy

53 Barb. 407 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 20, 1866

Brown, and upon which the notice to dismiss was predicated. … It was said by the court, in Gilbert v. The Columbia Turnpike Company, (3 John. Cas. 107,) that a notice, in legal proceedings, means a written notice. The same is affirmed by Brown, J., in Miner v.

People ex rel. Harbin v. Wilmot

104 Misc. 2d 272 · New York Supreme Court · May 2, 1980

Meltsner v Follette, 32 AD2d 389, 391 ) and is available when a prisoner is confined in the wrong State penal institution contrary to the sentencing court’s commitment (People ex rel. Saia v Martin, 289 NY 471, 477 ). … People v Brown, 63 AD2d 988 ).

Shoreham-Wading River Central School District v. New York State Board of Real Property Services

183 Misc. 2d 683 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 6, 2000

Co. v Assessor for Town of Brookhaven, supra.) … Power Auth. v Shoreham-Wading Riv. Cent.

Clapp v. Clapp

10 N.Y. St. Rep. 733 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 1, 1887

Crosby; for board. If the sums with which he is thus charged, increased by the disallowance of compensation and, also, by the disallowance of Mr. … Holt and Brown, and the order may be formulated acordingly. It should be carefully settled upon notice, and should require the payment directly to the creditors in question of the full amount of their respective claims.

Alexander v. Greene

7 Hill & Den. 533 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1844

(Mayor v. Humphries, 1 Carr. & Payne, 251; Breedlove v. Turner, 9 Mart. Lou. Rep. 353, 359, 380; Aldrich v. Brown, 11 Wend. 576 ; Hullman v. Bennett, 5 Esp. Rep. 226; Fitzsimmons v. Inglis, 5 Taunt. … Morris, Carth. 485; Gibson v. Paynton, 4 Burr. 2298; Nicholson v. Willan, 5 East, 507; Harris v. Packwood, 3 Taunt. 271; Orange County Bank v. Brown, 9 Wend. 115 .) 4.

People v. Horr

7 Barb. 9 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 3, 1849

Brown. … (See 4 Stark. 326, 7, 8; Rex v. Jones, Leach, 607; Id. 478; Arch. 254 to 258.) In The People v.

McQueen v. Babcock

41 Barb. 337 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 7, 1863

The defense under this statute is complete, unless the time during’ which the injunction, issued in the action of Adams v. … Brown, real or personal,” including the property mentioned in a certain assignment from Brown to McQxieen, therein mentioned.

National Commercial Bank v. Gray

24 N.Y.S. 997 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1893

Baldwin v. Brown, 16 N. Y. 359 ; Reed v. Farr, 35 N. Y. 113 ; Avery v. Woolen Co., 82 N. Y. 583 . We are thus brought to a consideration of the evidence introduced for the purpose of establishing a practical location. … , Dorothy Brown and Eleanor Brown, heirs of Henry Hogan and Martina Brown, deceased, which said Nelly Hogan, Henry Hogan, and Martina Brown were and are the heirs of William Hogan, deceased, of the second part, do enter into

People ex rel. State Board of Charities v. New York Soc. for Prevention of Cruelty to Children

53 N.Y.S. 1017 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1898

People v. Fitch, 154 N. Y. 14 , 47 N. E. 983 . … The case of People v. Fitch, supra, however, does not favor this contention.