Case law

Toomey v. Neenan

59 Misc. 2d 787 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 6, 1969

The case most closely in point is Reed v. Littleton ( 275 N. … The rule has been firmly established that it will not ordinarily intervene'to enjoin the enforcement of the law by the prosecuting officials (Davis v. American Society, 75 N. Y. 362 ; Delaney v. Flood, 183 N.

Barrett v. Cuskelly

52 Misc. 2d 250 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 21, 1966

The latter section specifically empowers the board to submit a proposition, such as involved here, to the voters at a special election, but contains no requirement that the board’s adoption of such resolution receive the … Guernsey v. Somers, 153 App. Div. 623 affd. 208 N. Y. 621 ).

Edwards v. Pickens

66 Misc. 2d 352 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 8, 1971

(Verduce v. Board of Higher Educ., 9 AD 2d 214 .) … (Brown v. Shyne, 242 N., Y. 176 ; Corbett v. Scott, 243 N. Y. 66 .) The rationale of these cases leads to the inevitable conclusion that the same rule applies to-.the unlicensed driver.

Langworthy & Clark v. Smith

2 Wend. 587 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1829

Brown v. Goodman, (3 T. R. 592, n. b.) was an action of debt on an arbitration bond, in which the time was limited for the arbitrator to make his award. … The court said that evidence that the contract was enlarged by paroi agreement will not support the declaration, The case of Brown v. Goodman has also been recognized by this court in Freeman v. Adams, (9 Johns.

People ex rel. Felder v. Warden of Queens House of Detention for Men

173 Misc. 2d 1029 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 28, 1997

Harris v Sullivan ( 74 NY2d 305 ) which limited the waiver of the hearing on out-of-state felony convictions to those instances where an indeterminate term was imposed. … Brown v New York State Bd. of Parole, 133 AD2d 792 ). Petitioner’s application to be restored to parole is denied. This matter first appeared on the court’s calendar under SP No. 146/97.

In re the Niagara, Lockport & Ontario Power Co.

133 Misc. 177 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 4, 1928

(Boom Co. v. Patterson, 98 U. S. 403 ; Ford Hydro-Electric Co. v. Neely, [C. C. A.] 13 F. [2d] 301; Brown v. Power Co., 140 N. C. 333 ; Rankin v. Town of Harrisonburg, 104 Va. 524 ; Emmons v. Utilities Power Co., -N. … S. 53, 79 ; Matter of Board of Water Supply of City of New York, 121 Misc. 204 ; affd., 209 App. Div. 841 ; New York Cent. R. R. Co. v. Maloney, 234 N. Y. 208 .)

Hayden v. Pierce

25 N.Y.S. 55 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 23, 1893

Code Civil Proc. § 401; 1 Titus v. Poole, 60 Hun, 1 , 14 N. Y. Supp. 678 ; Wilder v. Ballou, 68 Hun, 118 , 17 N. Y. Supp. 625 ; Hill v. Supervisors, 119 N. Y. 344 , 23 N. E. Rep. 921. … Wheeler v. Webster, 1 E. D. Smith, 1; Bennett v. Cook, 43 N. Y. 537 . 3. We think no error was committed in rejecting the declaration •of the deceased, which the defendant sought to prove by the witness Parsball.

Delta-Sonic Carwash Systems, Inc. v. Building Trades Council

168 Misc. 2d 672 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 5, 1995

Corp. v Los Angeles, 493 US 103, 110 [1989] [quoting Brown v Hotel Empls., 468 US 491, 503 (1984), supra].) "The NLRA * * * creates rights in labor and management both against one another and against the State.” … On the distinction between preemption based on the primary jurisdiction of the NLRB and preemption based on actual protection of conduct as a matter of Federal substantive right (see, Brown v Hotel Empls., 468 US 491, 502

Jackson ex dem. Livingston v. Kisselbrack

10 Johns. 336 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 15, 1813

In Goodtitle v. Way, (1 Term Rep. 735.) Doe v. Clare, (2 Term Rep. 735.) Doe v. Ashburner, (5 Term Rep. 163.) Doe v. … The case of Baxter v Browne (2 Bl. Rep. 973.) is much in point.

Varkonyi v. S. A. Empresa De Viacao Airea Rio Grandense

71 Misc. 2d 607 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1972

(See Brown v. Compagnie Nationale Air France, 8 Av. Cas. 17 , 272 [S. D. N. Y., 1962]; Spencer v. Northwest Orient Airlines, 201 *610 F. Supp. 504 [S. D. N. Y., 1962]; Mason v. British Overseas Airways Corp., 5 Av. … (See Aeronautical Statutes and Related Material, Civil Aeronautics Board, 419 [Rev. June 1, 1970].)

America Press, Inc. v. Lewisohn

74 Misc. 2d 562 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 13, 1973

In discussing exclusivity, respondents cite Matter of Board of Foreign Missions of M. E. Church v. Board of Assessors of *564 City of N. Y. ( 244 N. Y. 42, 45, 46 ). … (Sherbert v. Verner, 374 U. S. 398, 402 [1963]; Braunfeld v. Brown, 366 U. S. 599, 603-604 [1961] ; Torcaso v. Watkins, 367 U. S. 488 [1961]; Cantwell v. Connecticut, 310 U. S. 296, 303-304 [1940]; Davis v.

Shultz v. Chatfield

17 Misc. 264 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1896

Brown as the president of the corporation. … The case of Novelty Manufacturing Co. v. Connell, 88 Hun, 254 , cited by defendants, not only is not in conflict with the foregoing views, but seems rather to sustain them.

Gusdore Corp. v. Michaels

13 Misc. 2d 762 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 30, 1958

(Town Law, § 195; Matter of Beckmann v. Talbot, 278 N. Y. 146, 150 ; Lewis v. City of Lockport, 276 N. Y. 336, 343 ; New York Central & H. R. R. R. Co. v. City of Yonkers, 238 N. Y. 165 , 178; Matter of Doey v. … (General Municipal Law, § 51; Smith v. Hedges, 223 N. Y. 176 ; Talcott v. City of Buffalo, 125 N. Y. 280 ; Bogart v. County of Westchester, 270 App. Div. 274, 278 ; McCormick v.

People v. Tweed

13 Abb. Pr. 419 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1872

In Brown v. … v.

Johnson v. Pacific Steel Boiler Corp.

132 Misc. 735 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 24, 1928

Brown, its attorney, moves to set aside the alleged service upon it of the summons and complaint. … (Tauza v.

Geary v. Phillips

53 Misc. 2d 337 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 4, 1967

The defendants are the Mayor and Trustees constituting the Board of Trustees of the village. … We find nothing in the Municipal Home Rule Law which would limit the authority of the defendant village Board of Trustees to adopt the local law in question.

Hamilton v. Patrick

16 N.Y.S. 578 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 30, 1891

Justice v. Lang, 42 N. Y. 493 ; McCrea v. Purmort, 16 Wend. 465 . … Railroad Co. v. Dane, 43 N. Y. 240 ; Pol. Cont. 26; Mclver v. Richardson, 1 Maule & S. 557; Mozley v. Tinkler, 1 Cromp. M. & R. 692; Russell v. Thornton, 4 Hurl. & N. 788.

Tumminello v. Hamlet Development Co.

174 Misc. 2d 239 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 6, 1997

He contends that it was this Board who contracted with plaintiff’s employer to perform the work, and therefore the individuals can be held liable. … (Brown v Christopher St. Owners Corp., 211 AD2d 441 [1st Dept 1995], affd 87 NY2d 938 [1996]; DeNota v 45 E. 85th St. Corp., 163 Misc 2d 734 [1995].)

Stuart v. Blatchley

84 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 425 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1894

(Hagerty v. Andrews, 94 N. Y. 198 ; Shannon v. Pickell, 2 N. Y. St. Repr. 160.) … It may be that tbe respondent might have moved to have the demurrer stricken out as irregular (Doughty v. Devlin, 1 E. D.

Phillip v. Phillip

96 Misc. 471 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 15, 1916

Brown to appear on the witness stand and give her version of her relations with this old man and the good faith of the transactions with him. These facts amply support the decree asked for in this action. Edson v. … Real Prop. 672; Stelz v. Schreck, 128 N. Y. 263, 266, 267 .