Case law

Drexel v. Pease

32 N.Y. St. Rep. 853 · New York Supreme Court · May 16, 1890

Bank v. … Hazletine, it appeared that the correspondents and agents at Buffalo of one Brown of Hew York, in order to fill an* order from him, purchased, in their own name, a boat load of wheat, which was delivered on board a canal

Castro v. City of New York

45 Misc. 3d 805 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 20, 2014

General Municipal Law § 50-e (2), however, does not require that the information within a notice of claim be asserted “with literal nicety or exactness” (Brown v City of New York, 95 NY2d 389, 393 [2000]), and again, the … Auth., 117 AD3d 586 , 586 [1st Dept 2014]; Williams v County of Westchester, 103 AD3d 796, 797 [2d Dept 2013]; Rodriguez v Board of Educ. of City of N.Y., 107 AD3d 651 , 651 [1st Dept 2013]; Ana R. v New York City Hous.

George v. Fiore

62 Misc. 2d 429 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 18, 1970

Petitioners, Daisy George, Gertrude Wallace, Rachel Gibson, Lena Thornton, Willa Mae Maynard and Evelyn Brown (herein called “ petitioners; ” the other named petitioners, Mozelle Jacobs, Edward Ware, Clara Anderson and Jean … (See Matter of Crispell v. Rust, 149 Misc. 464, 467; Howard v. Clark, 59 Misc 2d 327, 328 .)

Lennon v. Philip Morris Companies

189 Misc. 2d 577 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 9, 2001

(Quoting Brooke Group v Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 509 US 209, 213 [1993].) Plaintiffs contend that lockstep pricing practices continued. … Where a statute instructs that it is “to take effect immediately,” then it is interpreted not to have a retroactive operation or effect (Murphy v Board of Educ., 104 AD2d 796 [2d Dept 1984], referring *586 to McKinney’s Cons

Bush v. McKenzie

21 N.Y.S. 279 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 8, 1892

In People v. Board Sup’rs, etc., (N. Y. App.) 32 N. E. Rep. 242, Earl, C. … Election boards and boards of canvassers shall be continued in existence for the purposes of such proceedings. ”' Section 35 of the same act provides: “No voter shall place any mark upon his ballot, or do any other act in

Henderson-Jones v. City of New York

55 Misc. 3d 401 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 27, 2016

(Bo ard of County Commrs. of Bryan County, Okla. v Brown, 520 US 397, 405 [1997]; Collins v City of Harker Heights, 503 US 115, 122 [1992]; Pembaur v City of Cincinnati, 475 US 469, 478 [1986].) … (Connick v Thompson, 563 US 51, 60-61 [2011]; Board of County Commrs. of Bryan County, Okla. v Brown, 520 US at 404 ; Jett v Dallas Ind. Sch. Dist., 491 US 701, 737 [1989].)

Grafton v. Brigham

24 N.Y.S. 54 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 30, 1893

It was distinctly held in Brown v. Mayor, etc., 66 N. … Even as to the amount due, Brown v. Mayor, etc., would seem to be in point. It was held, however, in Jarvis v. Driggs, 69 N. Y. 147 , that this particular question was not decided in Brown v.

Kraushaar v. Zion

188 Misc. 851 · New York Supreme Court · May 31, 1946

In Miller v. Schoene ( 276 U. S. 272, 279-280 ) Mr. … Knoblauch v. Warden, supra).

P & C Food Markets, Inc. v. Fox

18 Misc. 2d 850 · New York Supreme Court · May 9, 1959

{Dellwood Dairy Co. v. Brown, 106 N. Y. S. 2d 749.) … (Agriculture and Markets Law, §§ 254, 257, 258-c, 258-j; Dellwood Dairy Co. v. Brown, 106 N. Y. S. 2d 749, supra; Washburn’s Dairy v. Mansfield, 200 Misc. 1017 , supra; Matter of Abrams v.

Marvin v. Muller

32 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 163 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1881

(Besel v. N. Y. C. and H. R. R. Co., 70 N. Y., 173 ; Malone v. Hathway, 64 id., 5; Wright v. N. Y. C. and H. R. R. Co., 25 id., 562; Laning v. N. Y. C. and H. R. R. Co., 49 id., 532, 533; Flike v. B. and A. R. R. … Co., 53 id., 549, 553; Coughtry v. G. W.Co., 56 id., 124; De Graff v. N. Y. C. and H. R. R. Co,, 76 id., 125.) Now it must be noted that there was no defect in the derrick.

People ex rel. Hutchinson v. Collison

6 N.Y.S. 711 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1888

Tax-Titles, (3d Ed.) 403-409; Browne, Assessm. & Tax’n, 20-34; Sny. Rel. Corp. 86. … Proprietors v. City of Lowell, 1 Metc. 538 . The courts of Ohio, Michigan, and Missouri hold to "the same effect. College v. State, 19 Ohio, 110; Society v. Mayor, etc., 3 Mich. 172 ; Wyman v. City of St.

Cable v. Cooper

15 Johns. 152 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1818

Brown must, therefore, be considered as being in execution by legal process. … The sheriff, on this execution, would have had a right to retake Brown, if he had departed from his custody without his permission, or a new execution might hayc issued against him. On this point the case of Jackson v.

Schwab v. Oatman

56 Misc. 393 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1907

See also Williams v. Merle, 11 Wend. 80 ; Barnard v. Campbell, 55 N. Y. 456 ; Collins v. Ralli, 20 Hun, 246 ; Smith v. Clews, 114 id. 190 ; Follett Wool Co. v. Utica Trust & Dep. Co., 84 App. Div. 151 . … See also Smith v. Clews, supra; Follett Wool Co. v. Utica Trust & Dep. Co., supra; Collins v. Ralli, supra.

Franklin v. Rumsey Realty Corp.

32 Misc. 2d 57 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 5, 1961

The motion by the defendant Brown Brothers Auto Service for the dismissal of the complaint is grounded on the claim that it is neither a person nor a corporation, and that William Brown, the owner of the business, has not … It does not appear whether William Brown was served with the summons and complaint. However, an appearance has been made on behalf of Brown Brothers Auto Service in the action.

People v. Cohen

54 Misc. 2d 873 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 31, 1967

In the years 1958 to and including 1962 the Kings County Jury Board was composed of three Judges and the County Clerk. … People v. Jewett, 3 Wend. 314 .’ (See, also, Howard v. Kentucky, 200 U. S. 164, 173-174 ; Brown v. New Jersey, 175 U. S. 172,175 ; People v. Schmidt, 168 N. Y. 568, 577-578 ; Dolan v. People, 64 N.

Barrett v. Cuskelly

52 Misc. 2d 250 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 21, 1966

The latter section specifically empowers the board to submit a proposition, such as involved here, to the voters at a special election, but contains no requirement that the board’s adoption of such resolution receive the … Guernsey v. Somers, 153 App. Div. 623 affd. 208 N. Y. 621 ).

Hoyt v. Story

3 Barb. 262 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 13, 1848

In the case of Malcolm v. Scott, (3 Hare, 39,) the vice chancellor, in commenting on the case of Burn v. … This rule is recognized and acted upon in the case of Clark v. Mauran, ( 3 Paige, 373 ,) and in the case of Bradley v. Root, (5 Id. 632.)

Hazzard v. Chase National Bank

159 Misc. 57 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 14, 1936

In Browning v. Fidelity Trust Co. ( 250 Fed. 321 ; certiorari denied, 248 U. … .) *76 As was said by the court in Browning v. Fidelity Trust Co.

Jennings v. Chenango Mutual Insurance

2 Denio 75 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1846

In Schuyler v. … In Atherton v. Brown,( 14 Mass.

Toomey v. Neenan

59 Misc. 2d 787 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 6, 1969

The case most closely in point is Reed v. Littleton ( 275 N. … The rule has been firmly established that it will not ordinarily intervene'to enjoin the enforcement of the law by the prosecuting officials (Davis v. American Society, 75 N. Y. 362 ; Delaney v. Flood, 183 N.