Case law

Castle v. Bell Telephone Co.

30 Misc. 38 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1899

McHenry v. Jewett, 90 N. Y. 58 ; Wormser v. Brown, 149 id. 173 . It was held in McHenry v. … In Jerome v. Boss, 7 Johns.

Fossella v. Dinkins

128 Misc. 2d 822 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 6, 1985

Thus, while the court agrees with the intervenors-respondents that a failure to file objections within the time specified in the statute would require dismissal of the petition {Matter ofDe Santis v Brown, 37 AD2d 865 ) it … Matter of Stanley v Board of Appeals, 168 Misc 797 ).

Evertsen v. Sawyer

2 Wend. 507 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1829

That the rent accruing after the assignment to Brown, and before a re-assignment, is recoverable in the name of Brown alone ; 2. That the ground rent due to Gen. … This was in ejectment; but Lord Ellenborough, in Balls v.

Jaquith v. Simon

35 Misc. 2d 508 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 17, 1962

Fasbender, 1 N Y 2d 212, 233; Thompson v. Wallin, 301 N. Y. 476, 488 , affd. sub nom. Adler v. Board of Educ. of City of N. Y., 342 U. S. 485, 801, 951 ). … In Matter of Davis v. Board of Elections of City of N.

Hollister v. City of Rochester

41 Misc. 559 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1903

The street was improved during the summer of 1895, and completed and accepted by the executive board of the city in October, 1895, and thereafter, in July, 1896, the common council confirmed the assessment-roll and the entire … Y. 667 , in which case Judge Bookstaver said: “ The learned counsel for the appellant contends that since the settlement of the Brown controversy, the ownership of the lots affected by this assessment has been changed several

People ex rel. Dixon v. Chairman of the New York State Board of Parole

89 Misc. 2d 259 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 17, 1977

to the case at bar, the majority of said court affirmed an order directing the Board of Parole to remove an added one year of reformatory delinquent time. … Lopez v La Vallee ( 43 AD2d 647 ). (See, also, People v Edwards, 45 AD2d 743 , and People v Miller, 38 AD2d 745 .) Accordingly, the petition is dismissed.

Spicer v. Norton

13 Barb. 542 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 2, 1852

Hunt v. Brown, 5 Hill, 145 . Newcomb v. Clark, 1 Denio, 226 .) The form of expression is not material. It is enough (said Ch. Justice Tindal in 1 Bing. N. … If the decision in Brown v.

Danielewicz v. Aurigema

116 Misc. 2d 17 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 14, 1982

Subsequent to his resignation, he was reappointed by the town board for the balance of the term. … (See Matter of Brown v Ulster County Bd. of Elections, 100 Misc 2d 570 ; Matter of Hunting v Power, 20 NY2d 680 .)

Town of Hempstead v. West 45th Street Associates, Inc.

8 Misc. 2d 997 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 9, 1957

In Jerome v. Ross ( 7 Johns. … In those cases the remedy at law is not ample and complete (Ashburn v. Graves, 149 F. 968, 972 ). The application for a preliminary injunction is denied (O’Reilly v. New Yok El. R. R. Co., 148 N. Y. 347 ; Wormser v.

Betts v. Betts

4 Abb. N. Cas. 317 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1878

Coade, 10 Vesey, 500 ; Ackroyd v. Smithson, 1 Brown Ch. 503; Maugham v. Mason, 1 V. & B. 410; Wright v. Meth. Episcopal Church, Hoffm. 202 ; Hawley v. James, 7 Paige, 213 ; Wood v. Cone, 7 Paige, 471 ; Wood v. … Hamilton dole, for the Board of Education, and for Boards of Trustees of Schools of various wards. See also Straw v. Conference of M. E. Church, 67 Me. 2 See also on this point, Noyes v. Children’s Aid Society, 3 Abb.

People ex rel. Grant v. Board of Apportionment and Audit of the City and County of New York

43 How. Pr. 412 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1872

It may be that evidence was taken before the board that satisfied them that the relator had not rendered the services as alleged, or that the salary was not fixed by statute or valid contract, but that does not appear. … The powers of this board are analogous in auditing claims to those of the boards of supervisors in the several counties; and, while the amount which they shall allow on unliquidated claims is *414 within their discretion,

Rivera v. Blum

98 Misc. 2d 1002 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 27, 1978

(Matter of Brown v Lavine, 37 NY2d 317 .) … (Matter of Groban, 352 US 330 ; Madera v Board of Educ., supra; Wasson v Trowbridge, supra; Matter of Popper v Board of Regents of Univ. of State of N. Y., 26 AD2d 871 .)

Coalition to Save Hill v. Board of Appeals of the Incorporated Village of Port Jefferson

28 Misc. 3d 1084 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 25, 2010

(McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 1, Statutes §§ 91, 98; People v Finley, 10 NY3d 647 [2008]; Friedman v Connecticut Gen. Life Ins. Co., 9 NY3d 105 [2007].) … (See Statutes § 145; Jenkins v Fieldbridge Assoc., LLC, 65 AD3d 169 [2d Dept 2009].)

People v. Acton

33 How. Pr. 52 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1867

Pinckney , Brown, J., in a dissenting opinion relating to another point, remarks: “ It is the power which this act gives to intrust the execution of the duty of providing for the prevention of fires, to officers not elected … If they could not give any such power to boards of supervisors without a constitutional provision, I am at á loss to see any authority to bestow such a power on a board created by themselves, and not a recognized body in

Dillon v. Acme Oil Co.

2 N.Y.S. 289 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 19, 1888

The case of Brown v. Illius, 27 Conn. 84 , is very much like the case under consideration and sustains the conclusions which we have reached. In that case the action was for a nuisance. … See, also, Upjohn v. Board, 46 Mich. 542 , 9 N. W. Rep. 845 ; Acton v. Blundell, 12 Mees. & W. 324-346. In the case of Womersley v. Church, 17 L. T. (N.

People v. Monaghan

118 Misc. 2d 326 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 23, 1983

In support of his motion, the defendant cites the recent case of United States v Brown (supra). … Connecticut, 367 US 568 ; Reck v *329 Pate, 367 US 433 ; Ashcraft v Tennessee, 322 US 143 ; Brown v Mississippi, 297 US 278 ).

Kanaly v. O'Neil

147 Misc. 2d 149 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 25, 1990

Voccola v. Shilling

88 Misc. 2d 103 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 19, 1976

Browne. A brief review of the facts is required in order to properly address the issues presented herein. Six parking violation summonses were issued against respondent Browne’s vehicle. … Browne (Docket No. CC-17238) and to dismiss Browne’s order to show cause as being beyond the jurisdiction of the Civil Court.

Dietrich v. Hauser

45 Misc. 2d 805 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 5, 1965

The alleged words were spoken of the plaintiff before a meeting of the board of governors of the Lincoln Club at a time when plaintiff was its president. … In Villemin v. Brown ( 193 App. Div. 777 ) and Hofstadter v. Bienstock ( 213 App. Div. 807 ) (1st Dept, cases) it is held not to be slanderous per se. In Weiner v. Leviton ( 230 App.

Ames v. Dubinsky

5 Misc. 2d 380 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 18, 1947

League of Commission Merchants v. Hornung, 148 App. Div. 355 ; Green v. Board of Trade, 174 Ill. 585 ; Wood v. … Co. v. Hallam, 59 F. 530, 540 [C. G. A. 6th]; Putnam v. Browne, 162 Wis. 524 ; Estelle v. Daily News Pub. Co., 99 Neb. 397, 401 ; Wason v. Walter [1868-1869], L. R. 4 Q. B. 73, 93.)