Case law

People ex rel. Porter v. City of Rochester

21 Barb. 656 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 2, 1856

Since the decision of Birdsall v. … In The People v.

Santos v. Chappell

63 Misc. 2d 730 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 3, 1970

Armitage v. Fisher

4 Misc. 315 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1893

Canal Board, 55 N. Y. 393 ; Davis v. American Society, etc., 75 id. 369. … In Palmer v. Foley, 45 How.

People ex rel. Barnes v. Warden of Workhouse

127 Misc. 224 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 3, 1925

(See People v. Papia, App. Part of Special Sessions, Dec. 4, 1923, citing People v. Brown, 153 App. Div. 234, 235 , and People ex rel. Horowitz v. Hanley, 106 Misc. 625 .) … Sheldon v. Board of Appeals of City of New York, 234 N. Y. 484, 495 .) It is presumed that the Legislature did not intend an absurd result. (People v. Pfeiffen, 118 Misc. 403 .) In 36 Cyc.

Spindel v. New York City Housing Authority

41 Misc. 2d 363 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 3, 1964

Coupe, 9 A D 2d 260, 266-267; Matter of Battaglia v. Morton, 272 App. Div. 372 , 374; see, also, Matter of McNeles v. Board of Supervisors, 173 App. Div. 411 , affd. 219 N. Y. 578 ; Matter of Kass v. Gross, supra). … In support thereof, respondents cite Hurley v. Board of Educ. of City of N. Y. ( 270 N. Y. 275 ); Matter of Berger v. Walsh ( 291 N. Y. 220 ); Brown v. Craig ( 209 App. Div. 11 ), as well as other similar cases.

People ex rel. Vequilla v. Johnson

122 Misc. 2d 803 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 3, 1984

Delgado v Walters, 91 AD2d 1053 ). Respondents have failed to demonstrate that petitioner was not within the convenience and practical control of the Parole Board prior to November 2, 1983. … Delgado v Walters, supra; People ex rel. Brown v Walters, 84 AD2d 852 ). During this time period, parole merely had the warrant against petitioner executed and requested that petitioner be extradited.

Hill v. Bolden

191 Misc. 2d 354 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 21, 2002

Brown and the ACA. … Brown and the ACA. .

Lucadana v. Lucadana

49 Misc. 2d 1029 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 25, 1963

(Matter of Brown v. Board of Trustees of Town of Hamptonburg, 303 *1030 N. Y. 484, 490 . See, also, Ballentine’s Law Dictionary [Maxim, English translation], p. 66; Johnson v. City of Troy, 24 App. … Div. 602, 604 ; Cambreleng v. Graham, 79 Hnn 247, 248-249; American Preservers Co. v. Drescher, 4 Misc. 482 .)

Slevin v. Long Island Jewish Medical Center

66 Misc. 2d 312 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 6, 1971

(Matter of Westchester Reform Temple v. Brown, 22 N Y 2d 488 ; Matter of Diocese of Rochester v. Planning Bd. of Town of Brighton, 1 N Y 2d 508.) … (Matter of Westchester Reform Temple v. Brown, 22 N Y 2d 488, supra.)

Litt v. Emery

62 N.Y. St. Rep. 409 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1894

Brown, P. J., concurs; Cullen, J., not sitting. *410 The opinion of the justice upon the granting of a peremptory writ of mandamus was as follows: ‘Cullen, J. … It was said by the court of appeals : ‘The law does not recognize the principle that a board of officers can reduce the amount fixed by law for a salaried officer, or that the official can make a contract to that effect.

Hyde v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States

61 Misc. 518 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1908

Howe, Brown & Co., 157 U. … Hyde, one of the guarantors, was the Society’s president and a member of its board of directors.

Meredith v. Art Metal Construction Co.

97 Misc. 69 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1916

Citing Brinkerhoff v. Brown, 6 Johns. Ch. 139 ; Loos v. Wilkinson, 110 N. Y. 195 . For 'further cases sustaining the general principle enunciated, see People v. Tweed, 63 N. Y. 194 ; Barr v. New York, L. E. & W. R. R. … Rouget v. *84 Haight, 57 Hun, 119 ; Harrington v. Stillman, 120 App. Div. 659 .

Helms v. Diamond

76 Misc. 2d 253 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 14, 1973

This subdivision grants a court broader power to allow intervention than is provided in CPLR 1013 (Muccioli v. Board of Stds. & Appeals of City of N. Y., 42 Misc 2d 1088 ). … (See, e.g., Brown v. Waryas, 45 Misc 2d 77 .)

People ex rel. Kelly v. Scott

33 N.Y.S. 229 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 11, 1895

By chapter 602, Laws 1892, an “examining board of plumbers” is created in the cities of New York, Brooklyn, and Albany, and an “examining and supervising board of plumbers and plumbing” in all other cities of the state. … People v. Commissioners Dept. Fire & Bldg., 100 N. Y. 64 , 12 N. E. 641 .

Landmark West! v. City of New York

9 Misc. 3d 563 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 1, 2005

EDO’s Board of Directors approved the sale to the Museum on August 3, 2004. … (See Stein v Brown, 125 Misc 692, 694 [1925] [“When an action is brought to restrain action in behalf of a municipality, the officers whose duty it is to perform the acts sought to be enjoined are proper and usually necessary

Johnston v. Marinus

18 Abb. N. Cas. 72 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1886

Brown, J. … Browne. Lowry v. Plitt, 16 Am. L. Reg., N. S., 155; and Note by the Editor; also XI. Am. L. Rev., 781 (as to contests between next of kin of equal degree). Burial in Cases of Contagious Diseases, by Rev. Eli Corwin, D.

Humphrey v. Posluszny

148 Misc. 2d 848 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 21, 1990

This CPLR article 78 proceeding, brought by the minority of *849 the Lancaster Village Board (Board), raises the question whether the closed meetings held by the Board majority violate the Open Meetings Law (Public Officers … Any discussion of public business required compliance with the Open Meetings Law (see, e.g., Matter of Britt v County of Niagara, 82 AD2d 65, 68 ; Matter of Sciolino v Ryan, 81 AD2d 475, 479 ).

Grella v. Hevesi

10 Misc. 3d 519 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 22, 2005

Board of Regents of Univ. of State of N.Y., 53 NY2d 186, 194 [1981]; Flacke v Onondaga Landfill Sys., 69 NY2d 355, 363 [1987]; Akpan v Koch, 75 NY2d 561, 571 [1990]). … While the language of this exception is quite broad, it must be considered in the context of the general proscription of ‘double dipping’ (see, Brown v New York State Teachers’ Retirement Sys., 107 AD2d 103, 107 ).”

People ex rel. Lehigh Valley Railway Co. v. City of Buffalo

57 Misc. 10 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1907

Brown, J. . … In pursuance of such authority, the board of assessors prepared an assessment roll in which the property of the relator the Buffalo Creek Eailroad Company was assessed at the sum of $1,114.33 and the property of the relator

Silliman v. Wing

7 Hill & Den. 159 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1844

(Waller v. Harris, 20 Wend. 555 ; The People v. Covell, 18 id. 598 ; The People v. Collier, 19 id. 87.)