Case law

Martin v. State Liquor Authority

43 Misc. 2d 682 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 31, 1964

Y. 184, 189 ; Matter of Mooney v. Cohen, 272 N. Y. 33, 37 ; Darweger v. Staats, 267 N. Y. 290, 304-305 ; Stanton v. Board of Supervisors, 191 N. Y. 428, 432 ). … Y. 96 ; Brown v. Sentinel Investigations Serv., 39 Misc 2d 635, 636 ).

People ex rel. Russell v. Canvassers of Albany County

20 Abb. N. Cas. 19 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1887

People v. Canvassers, 12 Abb. N. C. 84 ; People v. Supervisors, 12 Barb. 217 , 220 ; Hadley v. Albany, 38 N. Y. 603 ; Morgan v. Quackenbush, 22 Barb. 72, 77 . … People v. Canvassers, 64 How. Pr. 201 ; S. C,, 2 Civ. Pro. R. (Browne) 452; People v. Canvassers, 64 How. Pr, 357; S. C., *25 12 Abb. N. C. 77 ; People v. Canvassers, 64 How. Pr. 334 ; 12 Abb. N.

Chamberlain v. Western Transportation Co.

45 Barb. 218 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 12, 1866

(Orange County Bank v. Brown, 9 Wend. 85 . Pardee v. Drew, 25 Wend. 459 . Hawkins v. Hoffman, 6 Hill, 586 , 589.) … And see Hill v. Patten, (8 East, 373,) where it was held that the term “ goods ” did not include the ship’s outfit, but extended only to “the wares or cargo for-sale laden on board the ship.”

Sechrest v. Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 21

5 Misc. 2d 557 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 16, 1957

Proof of additional facts by affidavit is not permitted upon such a motion (Matter of Mopes v. Swezey, 199 Misc. 997 , affd. 278 App. Div. 959 ; Matter of Felice v. Swezey, 278 App. Div. 958 ). … It shows by Exhibit “ F ” petitioner’s notice of appointment by the board and his acceptance. It is alleged that he acted as principal for three years and was paid by the board in that capacity.

Salmon v. M. E. Blasier Manufacturing Co.

53 Misc. 36 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1907

Brown v. Bristol, 1 Cow. 176 ; Newcomb v. … I do not think Robinson v.

Harr v. Wright

164 Misc. 395 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 30, 1936

(Gold v. Paynter, 101 Va. 714 ; 44 S. E. 920 .) The contract of subscription is an agreement to pay the unpaid part thereof, from time to time, as it is called for by the board of directors. (Wyman v. Bowman, [C. C. … Land Co. v. Raymond, 158 N. Y. 576 ; Sigua Iron Co. v. Brown, 171 id. 488; Richards v. Robin, 86 Misc. 528, 532 ; affd., 225 N. Y. 719 ; Campbell v. American Alkili Co., [C. C. A.] 125 Fed. 207 ; 14 C.

Goss v. Cahill

42 Barb. 310 · New York Supreme Court · May 9, 1864

In Ryder v. … Brown, Serugham, Botl and J, F. Barnard, Justices.]

Delta Financial Corp. v. Morrison

15 Misc. 3d 308 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 26, 2007

Brown and Byrne immediately *311 objected to question 2. The witness stated that he was not going to answer question 2 and Mr. Brown instructed his client not to answer question 2. … Brown, counsel for Stonehill, argues that the instruction to Mr.

Huestis v. County of Nassau

40 Misc. 2d 858 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 30, 1963

As stated in Senrow Concessions v. … Y. 290, 294 ); and the county did not lose control of this property because Fabrizio could be ousted without cause on short notice (Blank v. Browne, 217 App. Div. 624, 628 [2d Dept.]).

Matter of Kirklin v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of the City of Long Beach

New York Supreme Court · Jan 22, 2018

Thus, the four month period of CPLR § 217(1) does not apply to an Article 78 proceeding challenging a variance granted by a town zoning board ( Crowell v Zoning Board , 151 AD3d 1247, 1249 [3d Dept 2017]). … The granting of a variance requires zoning board action ( Haberman v Zoning Board , 9 NY3d 269, 275 [2007]).

Brander v. Town of Warren

18 Misc. 3d 477 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 7, 2007

(See 6 NYCRR 617.9 [b] [5] [v].) … (See Matter of Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of N.Y. v Board of Estimate of City of N.Y., 72 NY2d 674 [1988]; see also Matter of Penfield Panorama Area Community v Town of Penfield Planning Bd., 253 AD2d 342 [4th Dept 1999].)

Rodriguez v. Brooklyn Public Library

34 Misc. 3d 310 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 29, 2011

City of New York, 304 NY 440, 443 ; Sweeney v City of New York, 225 NY 271, 273 ; Purdy v City of New York, 193 NY 521, *318 523 ).” … (Salesian Socy. v Village of Ellenville, 41 NY2d 521 , 524 [1977]; see Nasca v Town of Brookhaven, 10 AD3d 415, 416 [2d Dept 2004]; Alford v City of New York, 115 AD2d 420, 421 [1st Dept 1985]; Matter of Crespo, 123 Misc

People's Gas & Electric Co. v. City of Oswego

108 Misc. 247 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1919

The decision of Judge Vann in the case of Carroll v. … In the case of Varick v.

Conger v. Treadway

3 Silv. Sup. 588 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 9, 1889

Irving Brown, for appellant. Geo. W. Weiant, for respondents. Pratt. J. … Treadway, 132 Id. 259; Matter of Board, etc., 62 Hun, 499 ; 133 N. Y. 436 ; Seymour v. Spring Forest Cem. Ass’n, 64 Hun, 632 .

Nuttall v. Simis

22 Misc. 19 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1897

If the adjudication in the mandamus proceeding against the corporate board, by which the plaintiff was restored to Ms place, necessarily embraced tMs question, nevertheless it is not binding in this action of tort against … Owen, 19 Barb. 22 ; Brown v. Smith, 24 id. 419; Bell v. Pierce, 48 id. 51; Id., 51 N. Y. 12 ; Barhyte v. Shepherd, 35 id. 238; Parish v. Golden, id. 462; Throop on Pub. Officers, §§ 541, 738).

Roche v. Wagner

34 Misc. 2d 920 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 6, 1962

of Carolan v. … The Appellate Division unanimously affirmed that order in 1959 (8 A D 2d 804), long after its decision in Mandle v. Brown ( 4 App.

Cohalan v. Schermerhorn

77 Misc. 2d 23 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 6, 1973

(Loechner v. Campoli, 49 N. J. 504, 512; *27 see, also, Ryan v. Board of Adj. of Twp. of Woodbridge, 49 N. J. 520.) … A planning board cannot consider economic hardship in approving a subdivision map (Matter of Diamond v. Specter, 39 A D 2d 942; Matter of McEnroe v.

Allstrom v. Lorenz

198 Misc. 970 · New York Supreme Court · May 2, 1950

In Matter of Allen v. … The court upheld the board’s position on the authority of Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.

Worth v. Town of Salamanca

72 Misc. 513 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1911

Brown, J. … The defendant Holdridge, under the direction of the county superintendent of highways and of the town board of the town of Salamanca, in January, 1910, placed a two-foot iron pipe across the traveled portion of the highway

Williams v. Meyer

48 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 545 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1886

(Howland v. Edmonds, 24 N. Y., 307 ; Tuckerman v. Brown, 33 id., 297; Lake Ontario, etc., R. R. Co. v. Mason, 16 id., 451.) … And the case of Scovill v. Thayer ( 105 U. S., 143 ) is opposed to that conclusion. But the authorities cited in the opinion, as well as Goshen Turnpike Company v.