Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnysupct

10,000+ results

1.08s

  • Engel v. Vitale

    18 Misc. 2d 659 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 24, 1959

    The status of public education at the time the amendment was adopted is also footnoted in Brown v. Board of Educ., supra, n. 58, p. 489, n. 4. . … For these reasons, Brown v. Board of Educ., supra, n. 58, p. 495, holding racially segregated educational facilities “ inherently unequal ” is distinguishable. .

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Cleveland v. City of Watertown

    99 Misc. 66 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1917

    McCutcheon v. Terminal Station Commission, 168 App. Div. 301, 306 ; Andrews v. Pierson, 174 id. 478, 481; Gibbs v. Luther, 81 Misc. Rep. 612 ; Stanton v. Board of Supervisors, 191 N. Y. 430 . … Bank of Rome v. Village of Rome, 18 N. Y. 44, 45 ; Bank of Chenango v. Brown, 26 id. 472, 473; Starin v. Town of Genoa, 23 id. 439, 447; Village of Gloversville v. Howell, 70 id. 287; People v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Masi Management, Inc. v. Town of Ogden

    180 Misc. 2d 881 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 25, 1999

    (Supra, 163 F3d, at 130, quoting Board of Regents v Roth, 408 US 564, 577 [1972].) … Corp., 429 US 252, 265 [1977]; Washington v Davis, 426 US 229, 239 [1976]; Matter of Di Maggio v Brown, 19 NY2d 283, 290-291 [1967].)

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Nathan's Famous, Inc. v. Local. 1115

    70 Misc. 2d 257 · New York Supreme Court · May 17, 1972

    As for defendants’ cited authority, Olympic Radio & Tel. v. Andrews ( 279 App. … See, e.g., United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs, 383 U. S. 715, 729 (and other citations).” (Landowne Co. v. Paper Box Mahers & Paper Specialties Union, Local 299, 278 F. Supp. 339, 341 ).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Dalton v. Van Dien

    72 Misc. 2d 287 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 27, 1972

    Y. 453 ; City of Yonkers v. Rentways, 304 N. Y. 499 ; Matter of B. & G. Constr. Corp. v. Board of Appeals of Vil. of Amityville, 309 N. Y. 730 ). … There must also be shown a deliberate selectivity based upon an unjustifiable standard or arbitrary classification (Matter of Di Maggio v. Brown, supra).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Perdue v. Jablonsky

    174 Misc. 2d 604 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 29, 1997

    However, the Board of Parole requires each petitioner to undergo a personal interview with a Parole Board member prior to re-release. (See, Executive Law § 259-i [3] [f] [x].) … Brown v New York State Div. of Parole, 70 NY2d 391 [1987].)

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Buffalo United Charter School v. New York State Public Employment Relations Board

    37 Misc. 3d 294 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 24, 2012

    Once the charters were issued by the State University of New York Board of Trustees (SUNY), the community leaders became the board of trustees for each of the two schools. … [1973], cert denied 414 US 1163 [1974]; People v Mann, 31 NY2d 253, 257-258 [1972]; Knapp v Monroe County Civ.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Pyramid Co. v. Mautner

    153 Misc. 2d 458 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 13, 1992

    No. 2 v Hyde, 466 US 2 .) … (Brown Shoe Co. v United States, 370 US 294 .) Plaintiff defines the relevant product as the ownership and operation of a major retail shopping mall and the relevant geographic market as Rockland County.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Murray v. Westall

    32 Misc. 2d 378 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 22, 1961

    The County Attorney appearing on behalf of the Board of Elections and the attorney for the petitioner concede that the only question for determination is one of law that may be determined by this court without reference. … Thus a write-in vote written in as “ Harry V. Borst ” was not counted for Henry V. Borst (Matter of Sweeney, 158 App. Div. 496 ).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Clements v. Williams

    100 Misc. 569 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1917

    Browning, King & Co. v. Stover, 145 App. … Pumpyansky v. Keating, 168 N. Y. 390 ; People ex rel. Cross Co. v. Ahearn, 124 App. Div. 845 ; People ex rel. Browning, King & Co. v. Stover , 145 id. 259-263 ; Acme Realty Co. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Bookheim v. Alexander

    19 N.Y.S. 776 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 2, 1892

    In Bank v. Crow, 60 N. … v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • In re the Opening of East One Hundred & Sixty-ninth Street

    26 Misc. 257 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1899

    In the case of Browning v. Collis, 21 Misc. … Y. 619 ; Genet v. City of Brooklyn, 99 id. 308.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Chemung Canal Bank v. Supervisors of Chemung County

    5 Denio 517 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1848

    (People v. Lawrence, 6 Hill, 244 .) … (Barker v. Mech. Ins. Co. 3 Wend. 94 .) I doubt also, whether a board, of supervisors can be parties to a bill of exchange.

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Chapman v. New York State Board of Parole

    166 Misc. 2d 890 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 14, 1995

    Gonzales v Dalsheim, 52 NY2d 9, 16 [1980]; Matter of Vasquez v New York State Bd. of Parole, 58 NY2d 981 [1983]). … Corby v Sullivan, 138 AD2d 432, 434 ).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Di Carlo v. State Liquor Authority

    54 Misc. 2d 482 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 15, 1967

    which precludes trafficking in alcoholic beverages by those convicted of felonies unless, subsequent to such conviction, such persons received either an executive pardon or a certificate of good conduct from the Parole Board … This court in a previous decision (Matter of Brown v.

    Modified by Di Carlo v. State Liquor Authority, 29 A.D.2d 757 (1968)Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Singer Co. v. Tax Assessor

    86 Misc. 631 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 8, 1976

    In the Third Department, in Matter of Seneca Grape Juice Corp. v Board of Assessors of Town of Lloyd ( 34 AD2d 692 ) that court there held that the Referee properly refused to grant a reduction in excess of the amount demanded … Leasing Co. v Browne ( 45 AD2d 129 ) repeated and reiterated its holding that no reduction may be granted in excess of the amount demanded in the application of grievance to the assessors even where the parties stipulate

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • New York State Public Employment Relations Board v. City of Troy

    164 Misc. 2d 9 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 7, 1995

    The Public Employment Relations Board (PERB) seeks to restrain the City of Troy from improper labor practices pursuant to Civil Service Law § 209-a (4). … (Rankin v. Shanker, 23 N Y 2d 111; City of New York v. De Lury, 23 N Y 2d 175.)” Even if PERB were exercising both quasi-judicial and prosecutory powers there would be no denial of due process.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 3 v. Associated Teachers of Huntington, Inc.

    62 Misc. 2d 906 · New York Supreme Court · May 4, 1970

    A final year salary increment, somewhat similar to the one under consideration, was held to be constitutional in Herreboudt v. Board of Educ. ( 41 Misc 2d 547 ). … In Matter of Pinto v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Krohn v. Thomas

    133 Misc. 145 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 6, 1928

    Dinsmore v. Keeper of Penitentiary ( 125 App. … (People v. Carter, 88 Hun, 304 ; People v. Wiechers, 179 N. Y. 459 ; People ex rel. Schneider v. Hayes, 108 App. Div. 6 .) ” To the same effect is the case of People ex rel. Brown v. Tighe ( 146 App.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Heimlich v. Charlton Lithographing, Inc.

    103 Misc. 2d 741 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 21, 1979

    Corp.], 29 AD2d 773 , affd 27 NY2d 357 ; Adelphi Enterprises v Mirpa, Inc., 33 AD2d *744 1019 ; King Records v Brown, 21 AD2d 593 ; Board of Educ. v Delle Cese, 65 Misc 2d 473 ; Industrial Iron & Steel Prods. … (King Records v Brown, supra; Simon v Vogel, 9 AD2d 63 .) Accordingly, the motion is granted only to the extent of staying the first cause of action.

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.