Case law

Holt v. Fleischman

37 Misc. 172 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1902

Hurley v. Brown, 44 App. Div. 480 ; Kurtz v. Potter, 44 id. 262, affd., 167 N. Y. 586 . … Hurley v. Brown, supra. In that case such a covenant after ten years was held to be unenforcible. Here thirty-five years have elapsed. In the meanwhile the entire character of the street, has changed.

Cooper v. Douglass

44 Barb. 409 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 12, 1864

Cooper the sum of one hundred and forty dollars with interest until paid, for my outfits and supplies on board the ship or vessel called the H. P. … Justice Paige in the case of Otis v. Sill, ( 8 Barb. 102 .) The entire opinion is learned and instructive, but too long for extensive quotation.

Bloom v. Power

21 Misc. 2d 885 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 3, 1959

Brown, J. The respondent, Manuel J. … (Matter of Collins v. Heffernan, 187 Misc. 165 ; O’Brien v. Heffernan , N. Y. L. J., August 10, 1951, Gold, J., p. 234, col. 3.) ” In Matter of Anderson v.

Chapman v. Fonda

31 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 130 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1881

Tiffany v. Kellogg Iron Works

59 Misc. 113 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1908

Brown v. Travelers’ Life & Accident Ins. Co., 26 App. Div. 544 ; People v. Montgomery, 13 Abb. Pr. (N. S.) 207; Schofield v. Little, 58 S. E. Rep. (Ga.) 666; Board of Comm. v. Lee, 32 Pac. Rep. (Colo.) 841; Barrus v. … (Mass.) 619; Flinn v. Prairie Co., 60 Ark. 240 ; St. Francis Co. v. Cummings, 55 id. 419; Sommers v. State, 5 Tex. Ct. App. 365 ; Ex parte Dement, 53 Ala. 389 .

Russell v. Department of Labor

135 Misc. 199 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 19, 1929

Brown, J. … (Labor Law of 1921, § 111, as amd. by Laws of 1927, chap. 166; Lown v. Department of Labor, 216 App. Div. 474 .)

People ex rel. Metropolitan Street Railway v. State Board of Tax Commissioners

145 N.Y.S. 334 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 27, 1912

Ry. v. State Board, etc., 146 N. Y. … Buffalo Co. v. Tax Com’rs, supra.

People ex rel. Buffalo & Fort Erie Public Bridge Authority v. Davis

163 Misc. 192 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 2, 1937

J., Constitutional Law, § 177, p. 760; Brown v. Smart, 145 U. S. 454, 459 ; Walsh v. Columbus, etc., R. R. Co., 176 id. 469 ; Smiley v. Kansas, 196 id. 457 ; Stewart v. Kansas City, 239 id. 14; People v. Booth, 32 N. … Board of Education, 76 id. 355 ; Duffy v. Shirden, 139 id. 755, 757; Marvin Realty Co. v. Barre, 142 id. 4; Vroman v. Fish, 181 id. 502, 509; People ex rel. Lewis v. Graves, 219 id. 233, 235; People ex rel. Ferris v.

Tradesmen's Nat. Bank v. Manhattan Lumber Co.

18 N.Y.S. 920 · New York Supreme Court · May 13, 1892

The board of directors had disposed of the notes. … board of directors.

People ex rel. De Pass v. New York State Board of Parole

86 Misc. 261 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 8, 1976

"The revocation hearing must be tendered within a reasonable time after the parolee is taken into custody” (Morrissey v Brewer, 408 US 471, 488 ). We deem the delay in this case of nearly four months to be unreasonable. … The effect of denying such a timely hearing to an alleged parole violator can result in his release (Matter of Beattie v New York State Bd. of Parole, 47 AD2d 656 ).

Piesco v. di Francesca

72 Misc. 2d 128 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 21, 1972

(See, further, Matter of Fulling v. Palumbo, 21 N Y 2d 30; Mary Chess, Inc. v. City of Glen Cove, 18 N Y 2d 205; Matter of Emmenegger v. Board of Appeals of Inc. Vil. of Garden City, 33 A D 2d 393; Junar Constr. Co. v. … (See Matter of Di Maggio v. Brown, 19 N Y 2d 283; Myer v. Myer, 271 App. Div. 465 , affd. 296 N. Y. 979 ; Matter of Posner v. Rockefeller, 31 A D 2d 352.)

People ex rel. Rochester Telephone Co. v. State Board of Tax Commissioners

134 N.Y.S. 987 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 20, 1912

Erhardt, a special examiner in the employ of the State Board, called the attention of the relator’s officers at Rochester to the fact that the State Board required this special report by wards. … Co. v. State Board, 55 App. Div. 218 , 67 N. Y. Supp. 69 .

Board of Education of Central School District No. 1 v. Lakeland Federation of Teachers

74 Misc. 2d 430 · New York Supreme Court · May 9, 1973

The grievance was denied by the Superintendent of Schools and by the board which is the petitioner herein. … In addition to the powers and functions provided in other sections of this article, the board [Public-Employment *435 Relations Board] shall have the following powers and functions: (a) to establish procedures consistent

People ex rel. Van Keuren v. Board of Town Auditors

17 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 551 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1877

(Lorillarrd v. Town of Monroe, 11 N. Y., 392 ; Morey v. Town of Newfane, 8 Barb., 645 : Galen v. Clyde & Rose R. R. Co., 27 id., 543, at 551; Fishkill v. Fishkill & Beekman R. R. Co., 22 id., 634; Mather v. … Crawford, 36 id., 564; and the same is implied in Hover v. Barkhoof, 44 N. Y., 113 .) In the case of Lamont v.

Cash v. Garden City Co.

38 Misc. 2d 1054 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 9, 1962

(Shapiro v. Health Ins. Plan, 7 N Y 2d 56, 64; Stagg Tool & Die Corp. v. Weisman, 12 A D 2d 99, 103.) … The question of interpretation of covenants was discussed in Kitching v. Brown ( 180 N.

Tebo v. Baker

23 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 182 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1878

Arc Plumbing & Heating Corp. v. Board of Responsibility of the Department of General Services

135 Misc. 2d 413 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 8, 1987

Corp. v Metropolitan Tr. Auth., 66 NY2d 144 [1985]; Matter of Clancy-Cullen Stor. Co. v Board of Elections, 98 AD2d 635 [1st Dept 1983]). … v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222 ).

Board of Education of Clarkstown Central School District No. 1 v. Clarkstown Teachers' Ass'n

73 Misc. 2d 349 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 6, 1972

engaged in any acts of extreme provocation as to detract from defendant’s responsibility for the eight-day strike, or that plaintiff failed to negotiate in good faith, or that plaintiff was part of a “ conspiracy ” with other Boards … The afore-mentioned fines are to he paid to the plaintiff (see Goodman v. State of New Yorh, 67 Misc 2d 877 , affd. 38 A D 2d 895).

Swarthout v. New Jersey Steamboat Co.

46 Barb. 222 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 4, 1865

The principal question to be determined in this case is, whether a compliance by the defendant with the provisions of the act of congress “to provide for the better security of the lives of passengers on board of vessels … Beckford v. Wood, 7 T. R. 620. Burden v. Crocker, 10 Pick. 383 . See also Renwick v. Morris, 7 Hill, 575 ; Clark v. Brown, 18 Wend. 213 .)

Spooner v. Brooklyn City Rail Road

36 Barb. 217 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 10, 1862

In the case of Willis v. The Long Island R. R. … Ernott, Brown and Scrugham, Justices.]