Case law

Board of Education of Union Free School v. Mapes

14 N.Y. St. Rep. 593 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1888

The board (plaintiff) was empowered to use the moneys for the purpose of the act, among which it specified '' the purchasing the school site selected by said special meeting of the taxable inhabitants.” … The Rider Raft Co. v. Roach, 97 N. Y. 378 Moore v.

Duke & Benedict, Inc. v. Board of Education of Carmel Central School District

81 Misc. 2d 1043 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 14, 1975

(Buchko v Board of Educ. of Connetquot Cent. School Dist. No. 7, 43 Misc 2d 43 ; see, also, Matter of Pacos v Hunter, 29 Misc 2d 404 ; Turco v Union Free School Dist. … In Matter of Raffone v Pearsall ( 39 AD2d 208 ), a proposed school budget was approved by the qualified voters.

Middleton v. Board of Education of the South Jefferson Central School District

109 Misc. 2d 1015 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 16, 1981

In support of this contention, the respondent cites Matter of Skliar v Board of Educ. ( 45 AD2d 1012 ), and Kirkland v Board of Educ. ( 49 AD2d 693 ). … (See Matter of Lezette v Board of Educ., 35 NY3d 272 ; Matter of Spinney Hill Collision v Caso, 56 AD2d 655 ; Matter of McNamara v Board of Educ., 54 AD2d 467 .)

Slater v. State Liquor Authority

6 Misc. 2d 980 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 26, 1956

Brown, J. Petitioner seeks an article 78 review of the determination of the respondent board in refusing his application to transfer his retail liquor store license to other premises. … .” *981 The board’s determination must be sustained “if either ground is valid ” (Porrazzo v. O’Connell, 119 N. Y. S. 2d 45, 47).

Board of Education of Central High School District No. 2 v. Allen

51 Misc. 2d 181 · New York Supreme Court · May 13, 1966

The ease of Packer Collegiate Inst. v. University of the State of N. Y. ( 298 N. Y. 184 ) is not at all apposite, even if the issue had been properly pleaded. … In the present case the Central High School District Board has no control over grades kindergarten through 6, and, conversely, the component Union Free School District Board has no control over grades 7 through 12.

State v. Stevens

130 Misc. 2d 790 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 24, 1985

(State of New York v Princess Prestige Co., 42 NY2d 104 ; Matter of State of New York v Intercounty Mortgagee Corp., 87 AD2d 748 ; Matter of State of New York v Citibank, 537 F Supp 1192 [SDNY 1982].) *792 The papers establish … (State of New York v Princess Prestige Co., supra; People v Volkswagen of Am., 47 AD2d 868 ; State of New York v Ginzburg, 104 Misc 2d 292 .)

Brinkerhoff v. Tiernan

61 Misc. 586 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1908

Lewis v. Cook, 150 N. Y. 163 ; Long v. Rodgers, 79 *589 Hun, 441 . … Kerr v. Blodgett, 48 N. Y. 62 ; Brinckerhoff v. Bostwick, 99 id. 185 ; MacArdell v. Olcott, 62 App. Div. 127 .

McStay v. Erie Railroad

99 Misc. 673 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1917

Munday v. Nassau El. R. Co., 99 Misc. Rep. 28 ; Von Der Born v. Schultz, 104 App. Div. 94 ; Hospital Supply Co. v. O’Neill, 10 Misc. Rep. 655 ; Morss v. Sherrill, 63 Barb. 21, 27 ; Perlman v. Brooklyn Heights R. R. … Dobiecki v. Sharp, 88 N. Y. 203 ; Ayres v. D., L. & W. R. R. Co., 158 id. 254 ; Archer v. N. Y., N. H. & H. R. R. Co., 106 id. 589; Paulding v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 132 App. Div. 68 ; Lehigh Valley R. R. Co. v.

Hennessey v. People

21 How. Pr. 239 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1861

been previously occupied by the prisoner as a grocery store, and as a resi *240 dence for his family, under a lease, which had two years to run, but which was uninhabited at the time of the fire; that some of the weather boards … The indictment is for setting fire to the dwelling house of Caroline Brown, in the night-time.

Bean v. Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 17

71 Misc. 2d 747 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 22, 1972

acts of school authorities by the Commissioner of Education, it has been held that the Supreme Court has concurrent jurisdiction with the Commissioner to hear and determine an application of this nature (Matter of Galloway v. … may not substitute its judgment for that of the school board.

Board of Education of Union Free Schools, District No. 2 v. Reid

29 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 145 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1880

Sullivan v. People

1 Park. Cr. 347 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1852

In our own state, in The People v. … Deceased continued to urge Brown along, and at length got him, according to the testimony, as far as the alley way to the house in which he boarded, when a third clenching took place, Brown trying to throw tlm deceased.

People ex rel. Commercial Cable Co. v. State Board of Tax Commissioners

99 Misc. 532 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1917

Telegraph Co. v. Texas, 105 U. S. 460 ; Baltic Mining Co. v. Massachusetts, 231 id. 68; Met. St. Ry. Co. v. N. Y., 19 U. S. 1 . In Kansas City Ry. v. Kansas, 240 U. … to show that the result arrived at by the board is incorrect.

Holmes v. County of Erie

178 Misc. 46 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 9, 1942

(Lorillard v. Town of Monroe, 11 N. Y. 392 ; Brown v. People, 75 id. 441, 442 .) The duty of punishing criminals is inherent in the sovereign power. … In the case of Bloom v. Jewish Board of Guardians ( 286 N. Y. 349 ) the plaintiff was committed by a court to the defendant, an incorporated institution.

Connelly v. City of Elmira

144 Misc. 282 · New York Supreme Court · May 14, 1932

(Matter of Dovel Co. v. Village of Lynbrook, 213 App. Div. 570 ; Knowles v. City of New York, 176 N. Y. 430, 438 ; Browne v. Walker, 131 Misc. 736 .) … If the board was entitled to use its judgment, how can fraud or the like be so inferred in the absence of the allegation of any facts indicating collusion or improper motives? In Cook v.

Melo v. Jewish Board of Family & Children's Services, Inc.

183 Misc. 2d 776 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 13, 1999

(See, Matter of Blanchard v Integrated Food Sys., 220 AD2d 895 ; Acevedo v Consolidated Edison Co., 189 AD2d 497 .) … The Appellate Division, Third Department, remitted the matter to the Board for clarification as to whether the Board in fact weighed the available evidence and properly determined that the statutory presumption in favor of

McKiernan v. Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 1

1 Misc. 2d 925 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1956

The claimant contends that, under the circumstances, the board has waived the requirement of the statute as to manner of service of the notice of claim and cites particularly Teresta v. City of New York ( 304 N. … Y. 440 ) and Boettner v. Village of Mamaroneck (123 N. Y. S. 2d 849).

Consumer Protection Board of New York v. Public Service Commission of New York

110 Misc. 2d 1 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 7, 1981

(Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222 .) … (Matter of United States Tube & Foundry Co. v Feinberg, 7 AD2d 591, 595 .)

Frank v. Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 11

71 Misc. 2d 318 · New York Supreme Court · May 8, 1972

Their claim is that the school district is in violation of section 5 of article V on pages 5 and 6 of the agreement, which provides for the granting of 15 sabbatical leaves annually and the eligibility requirements to receive … In Matter of Messano v. Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist.

People ex rel. Lamb v. Board of Health of Long Island City

27 N.Y.S. 660 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 12, 1894

It is to the ■effect that he caused the mail of the health board to be delivered and received at his residence, instead of at the office of the board. … If ■there was mail delivered at his residence after the conversation with the health officer upon the subject, it seems to have been the ■act of the mail carrier, who could not find the office of the board ■open, rather than