Case law

People ex rel. Lawrence v. Board of Supervisors

18 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 306 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1877

Law, [2d ed.], 104 et. seq.; People v. Devlin, 33 N. Y., 273 ; Roosevelt v, Godard, 52 Barb., 534 .) … (Supervisors v. Wandel, 6 Lans., 33 ; Supervisors v. Ellis, 59 N. Y., 620 .)

People ex rel. Mayor v. Board of Assessors

54 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 383 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1888

Luke v. City of Brooklyn ( 43 Barb., 54 ), affirmed in the Court of Appeals, but no opinion written. See, however, Atlantic Dock Company v. City of Brooklyn (1 Abb. Ct. of App. Dec., 24); Orr v. City of Brooklyn ( 36 N. … Mills Water-works Co. v. Forrest, 91 N. Y., 97 .)

People ex rel. City of Lockport v. Board of Supervisors

50 How. Pr. 353 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 22, 1874

All actions against counties must be brought against the board of supervisors thereof (2 Rev. Stat., 473, sec. 95; 1 id., 364). … It is strictly an action against the county as a municipal corporation, prosecuted in the manner specially directed by statute, in which the board of supervisors is named defendant. The board is not an officer.

Board of Directors of Hunt Club at Coram Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. v. Hebb

22 Misc. 3d 584 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 17, 2008

Bank of Centereach, F.S.B. v Denkensohn, 222 AD2d 659 [2d Dept 1995]; Crest/Good Mfg. Co. v Baumann, 160 AD2d 831 [2d Dept 1990]). … Bank v Chase, 226 AD2d 1034 [3d Dept 1996]).

Sherman v. Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District

88 Misc. 2d 661 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1976

Van Vleck, Inc. v Klein, 49 Misc 2d 240 .) … (Matter of Walker v Murphy, 15 NY2d 650 ; Matter of Payton v New York City Tr. Auth., 8 NY2d 737 ; Matter of Diocese of Rochester v Planning Bd. of Town of Brighton, 1 NY2d 508 .)

People ex rel. Babbitt v. Board of Commissioners of Taxes & Assessments

41 How. Pr. 459 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1870

The Board of Education of Lockport, *470 ( 46 Barb., 588 ), which may be cited as authority for the action of the respondents in this case, and which, therefore,, demands some consideration here. … V. The case which is made by the relator commends itself to the court, as one presented in good faith.

People ex rel. Burhans v. Board of Supervisors

39 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 607 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1884

It was now the duty of the board to take them up and pass upon them, item by item (People ex rel. Thurston v. Town Auditors, 82 N. … Thomson v.

People ex rel. Rorke v. Board of Assessors

39 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 457 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1884

.: The order made at Special Term necessarily resulted from the principle established in Chegaray v. The Mayor ( 13 N. Y., 220 ). … The present •is a case where the owners of land leased to the board of education a house for school purposes, and it has in point of fact been used for a public school.

Claim of Peterson v. City of New York

73 Misc. 2d 618 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 18, 1973

Leo Brown, J. This is a motion to permit late filing of a notice of claim against the Board of Education of the City of New York pursuant to section 50-e of the General Municipal Law. … In these circumstances, it is clear, that there was a cognizable relationship between the infancy and the failure to serve a timely notice of claim on the Board of Education". (Kern v. Central Free School Dist.

People ex rel. Everett v. Board of Supervisors

36 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 185 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1883

Van Keuren v. Auditors, 74 N. Y., 311 ; Laws 1880, chap. 554; 2 R. S., m. p. 474, § 102, etc.) The judgment is to be collected from the commissioners (2 R. … We cannbt determine whether or not these commissioners will have any claim against the town upon their accounting. *186 There is nothing in the remark to which we are referred, made in Van Alstyne v. Freday ( 41 N.

People ex rel. Buffalo & Lake Erie Traction Co. v. State Board

77 Misc. 235 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1912

Co. v. State Board of Tax Commissioners, 202 N. Y. 426 . … Co. v. Woodbury, 203 N.

People ex rel. Funke v. Board of Excise

31 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 195 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1881

(People v. Supervisors, 51 N. Y., 442, 446 ; People ex rel. Beller v. Dwight, 3 Hun, 306 .) … Even if the court had the power to cause the board to act again upon the complaint, it could not prescribe the decision which they should make.

Washington v. Dunn

15 Misc. 2d 765 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 31, 1958

(Thomas v. Musical Mut. Protective Union, 121 N. Y. 45, 52 ; Kane v. Walsh, 295 N. Y. 198, 206-207 .) … (Rose v. Brown, 186 Misc. 553 .) This the petitioners here have failed to do.

Hamilton v. New York State Division of Parole

36 Misc. 3d 440 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 6, 2012

Executive Law § 259-i (2) (c) sets forth the factors that the Parole Board must consider in evaluating discretionary parole requests (see Matter of Wan Zhang v Travis, 10 AD3d 828, 829 [3d Dept 2004]). … Petitioner also argues that the Board’s decision amounts to an unauthorized resentencing. This argument is without merit (see Matter of Marsh v New York State Div. of Parole, 31 AD3d 898 [3d Dept 2006]).

Cleaners & Dyers Board of Trade, Inc. v. Spotless Dollar Cleaners, Inc.

150 Misc. 699 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 26, 1934

People ex rel. Peck v. Board of Police of the Metropolitan Police District

35 Barb. 651 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 4, 1861

Tinsley v. Monserrat

61 Misc. 2d 599 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 30, 1970

The respondent Board of Education caused to be published a proposed plan for the Borough of Manhattan. … The result is contrary to developing trends in this complex area and in violation of the principles enunciated in Brown v. Board of Educ. ( 347 U. S. 483 ).

People ex rel. Bahn v. Board of Supervisors

16 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 440 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1876

His account was an ordinary county charge — necessarily to be audited and passed upon by the board of supervisors. … Johnson v. Delaware Supervisors ( 45 N. Y., 196 ); The People v. Otsego Supervisors (51 id., 401), and the order directing such writ to issue, was correct and should be affirmed, with costs. Order affirmed.

People ex rel. Williams v. Board of Assessors

9 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 583 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1874

Marsh v. … People v. Supervisors of Allegany, 15 Wend., 198 ; People ex rel. Marsh v. Delaney, 49 N. Y., 655 .

People ex rel. Groton Bridge Manuf'g Co. v. Town Board

36 N.Y.S. 1062 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 28, 1895

The resolution was signed by the members of the town board. … The resolution of the board was unquestionably sufficient to authorize the commissioner to construct a new bridge* People v. Smith, 83 Hun, 432 , 31 N. Y. Supp. 746 .