Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.65s
31 Barb. 447 · New York Supreme Court · May 14, 1860
Hart & Hoyt v. … Lott, Emott and Brown, Justices.]
Cited 5 timesPublished25 Wend. 458 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1841
The principle of the case of The Orange County Bank, v. Brown, 9 Wendell, 85 ,1 think decisive against the plaintiff here. That case was very fully argued before us, and the law of it deliberately settled. … See also Batson v. Donavan, 4 Barn. & Ald. 340. [ *462 ] *The principle applies fully to the case before us.
Cited 5 timesPublishedMt. Zion Baptist Church of Port Chester, Inc. v. Brown
23 Misc. 2d 28 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 29, 1959
(Moser v. Fieland, 5 Misc 2d 937 ; Town of Harrison v. Sunny Ridge Bldrs., 170 Misc. 161 ; Ritter v. Mountain Camp Holding Corp., 252 App. Div. 602 .) … (See Serxner v. Elgart, 196 Misc. 1053 ; Woodward v. Southampton Fed. Sav. & Loan Assn., 161 N. Y. S. 2d 552, and Friedman v. Roseth Corp., 190 Misc. 742 , mod. on other matters sub nom. Freidman v. Odora Co., 273 App.
Cited 0 timesPublishedThompson v. Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 2
124 Misc. 840 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 29, 1925
(Dillon v. Acme Oil Company, 49 Hun, 565 .) In 40 Cyc.
Cited 3 timesPublishedNew York State Labor Relations Board v. Peerless Wood Products, Inc.
170 Misc. 594 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 27, 1939
The Board’s findings of fact are supported by the evidence and the order of the Board thereunder is, therefore, valid under the State Labor Relations Act. (Labor Law, §§ 700 et seq.) … The court is bound to accept the Board’s findings as conclusive when supported by evidence. (Associated Press v. National Labor Relations Board, 301 U. S. 103 ; Washington, Virginia & Maryland Coach Co. v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. Rogers v. New York State Board of Parole
161 Misc. 2d 875 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 13, 1994
(See, McGinnis v United States ex rel. Pollack, 452 F2d 833 [2d Cir 1971].)
Cited 1 timesPublishedHarley Rendezvous, Inc. v. Town of Duanesburg Zoning Board of Appeals
131 Misc. 2d 1060 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 18, 1986
of the Town Board.” … Actions requiring approval of the Zoning Board of Appeals”.
Cited 1 timesPublishedGlens Falls Insurance v. National Board of Fire Underwriters Building Corp.
63 Misc. 2d 989 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 4, 1970
Board members ”. … As such it is a reasonable restriction on the shareholders’ right of transfer (Allen v. Biltmore Tissue Corp., 2 N Y 2d 534). The application is denied.
Cited 3 timesPublishedEllison v. Board of Appeals of the City of Long Beach
25 Misc. 2d 749 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 7, 1960
Justice (now Judge) Van Voorhis considered the problem several times at Special Term and held that transfer was not required *751 (Matter of Hopkins v. Board of Appeals, 178 Misc. 186, 191 ; Matter of Romig v. … Albans-Sprmgfield Corp. v. Connell, 257 N. Y. 73, 83 ; Matter of Butler v. Connell, 235 App. Div. 806 ).
Cited 2 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. White v. Board of Supervisors
48 N.Y. St. Rep. 3 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 29, 1893
Bliss v. The Board of Supervisors of Cortland County, 39 St Rep., 313. … Sims v. The Fire Commissioners, 73 N. Y., 437 . It will thus be seen that the return denies that the account in question was passed upon by the board of supervisors without evidence being tahen.
Cited 0 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. Cosford v. Board of Supervisors
38 N.Y. St. Rep. 964 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 2, 1891
$136 70 *966 The contention here arises over the items in the first bill, “ 12 folios for record, $3.00; 82 miles traveled, $8.20;” and in the second bill, 378 folios for record, $94.50, and 170 miles traveled, $17.00 The board … Van Hoevenbergh v. Hasbrouck, 45 Barb., 197 , referrred to in the relator’s brief, was decided before the act of 1874 was passed, making the physician’s services in such case a charge against the county.
Cited 0 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. Gihon v. Board of Assessors
6 N.Y. St. Rep. 3 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 14, 1886
The chairman of the board testified that “the court directed the alteration, and we made it.” The parties left the matter in this state in respect to the order. … The case of Clark v. Norton ( 49 N. Y., 243 ), was decided upon the law as it was before the law of 1871 was passed.
Cited 0 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. Hoffman v. Board of Education
4 N.Y. St. Rep. 747 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 30, 1886
Crawford, V on William Wood, ) Teachers.” … People v. Board of Police Commissioners, 93 N. Y., 97 ; People v. Board of Fire Commissioners, 96 id., 644.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBuhlman v. Board of Education of the Ramapo Central School District
107 Misc. 2d 932 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 28, 1980
Neff, who, upon his arrival, advised the boys of his appreciation for their frankness and co-operation, reminded them of the rules, told them that the incident would be reported to the school board and that his decision would … (Cafeteria Workers v McElroy, 367 US 886, 895 .)
Cited 1 timesPublishedRobertson v. Chairman of the New York State Board of Parole
122 Misc. 2d 829 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 2, 1984
Section 259-k of the Executive Law authorizes the Parole Board to make rules for the purpose of maintaining the confidentiality of records. … Piccarillo v New York State Bd. of Parole, 48 NY2d 76 ; People ex rel. Maggio v Casscles, 28 NY2d 415 ; People ex rel. Menechino v Warden, 27 NY2d 376 ).
Cited 2 timesPublishedEllish v. Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Ramapo
141 Misc. 916 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 11, 1931
v. … Div. 753 ; Matter of Melita v. Nolan, 126 Misc. 345, 348 ; Matter of Stevens v. Clarke, 216 App. Div. 351, 359, 360 ; Matter of Pounds v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedBoard of Hudson River Regulating District v. Fonda, Johnstown & Gloversville Railroad
127 Misc. 866 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 31, 1926
(Board of Black River Regulating District v. Ogsbury, 203 App. Div. 43, 45 ; affd., 235 N. Y. 600 .) The section invests the district board with the powers therein set forth to effect the purpose. … (Board of Black River Regulating District v. Ogsbury, supra; Matter of City of Rochester v. Holden, supra, 390; Pocantico Water Works Co. v. Bird, 130 N. Y. 249, 258 .)
Cited 3 timesPublishedVestal Employees Ass'n v. Public Employment Relations Board
175 Misc. 2d 98 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1997
School Dist. v Public Empl. … Board of Educ., 35 NY2d 743, 744 ), or 'inescapably implicit’ in the statute (Matter of Cohoes City School Dist. v Cohoes Teachers Assn., 40 NY2d 774, 778 ; see also, Matter of City School Dist. v New York State Pub.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCrandall v. Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 1
37 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 309 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1883
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion textWhiteside v. Noyac Cottage Ass'n
32 N.Y.S. 724 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1895
Sweet v. Mowry, supra; Randall v. Carpenter, supra; Allen v. Brown, 5 Lans. 511 ; Troxell v. Haynes, 16 Abb. Pr. (N. S.) 1. … Allen v. Brown, supra; Troxell v. Haynes, supra; Newton v. Russell, 87 N. Y. 527 ; Randall v. Carpenter, 88 N. Y. 293 . In Newton v.
Cited 8 timesPublished
Ask Donna