Case law

Davidson v. New York State Board of Law Examiners

86 Misc. 744 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 13, 1976

(People v Justices of Delaware, 1 Johns. Cas. 182 .) … (Matter of Erlanger v Regents of Univ. of State of New York, 256 App Div 444 ; Matter of Marburg v Cole, 286 NY 202 .)

Reeves v. Pierson

30 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 185 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1880

Brown and Ellen A. Brown, his wife, to the order of the defendant Swan. It was indorsed by Pierson, and then indorsed by to the plaintiff. … In the case of Woodwoorth v.

AG-II Acquisition Corp. v. Board of Assessors

21 Misc. 3d 543 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 11, 2008

Matter of Cerro v Washington County Bd. of Supervisors ( 270 AD2d 679 [3d Dept 2000]) involved a challenge to the determination of the Washington County Board of Supervisors to sell a parcel of county-owned property to the … School Dist. v Saratoga County Indus. Dev. Agency, 217 AD2d 330 [3d Dept 1995].)

New York State Labor Relations Board v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

183 Misc. 1064 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 13, 1944

This court is thus without power to disturb that finding of fact by the Board. (Met. Life Ins. Co. v. Labor Relations Board,. 280 N. Y. 194 ; Matter of Stork Restaurant, lnc.r v. Boland, 282 N. Y. 256 ; Board v. … Foundries v. Tri-City Council, 257 U. S. 184, 209 ; May’s Furs $ Ready - to-Wear, Inc., v. Bauer, 282 N. Y. 331, 340 ; J. I. Case Co. v. Labor Board, 321 TJ. S. 332; Exchange Bakery & Restaurant, Inc., v.

Time Equities, Inc. v. Naeringsbygg 1 Norge III AS

New York Supreme Court · Feb 24, 2016

Plaintiffs claim that the Agreement was approved by the Scandinavian Board, rather than KFS or its board of directors, and point to the Scandinavian Board's ability to act through NBNIII to authorize the due diligence described … Unlike the circumstances in Shisgal v Brown , 21 AD3d 845 , 849 (1st Dept 2005) on which plaintiffs rely ( see Opp. at 6 and transcript of oral argument on this motion, p. 25), this is not a case in which the corporate form

Board of Education of the City School District v. City Council

59 Misc. 2d 784 · New York Supreme Court · May 27, 1969

The scheme of preserving continuity was carried out to the extent of continuing in office the members of the Board of Education (except where a board member also occupied another city office) until their current terms expired … However, Board of Education of Baltimore County v. Hartmann ( 146 Md. 307 ) presents some interesting parallels.

People ex rel. Van Hise v. Board of Police Commissioners

11 N.Y.S. 841 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 26, 1890

The question, as to the right to have counsel on such a hearing, was before this court in People v. Hannan, 10 N. Y. … The counsel for the defendant cites People v. Board, etc., 93 N. Y. 97 .

Rauh v. Board of Commissioners of the Department of Public Parks

66 How. Pr. 368 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1884

Ho statute has been cited which gives to the board of commissioners of the department of public parks any greater corporate powers than those conferred upon the other departments of the city government. … Entertaining these views I am of the opinion that the board of commissioners of the department of public parks are not liable to be sued as a corporate entity, and that therefore it is unnecessary to discus's any of.' the

People ex rel. Hensley v. New York State Board of Parole

83 Misc. 2d 269 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 12, 1975

In this habeas corpus proceeding, relator alleges that the Board of Parole waived his alleged violation of parole by failure to execute the parole violation warrant with due diligence and, further, that the board has failed … Grosso v Addition, 185 Misc 670 ; Simon v Moseley, 452 F2d 306; Greene v Michigan Department of Corrections, 315 F2d 546).

Thurman v. Snowden

52 Misc. 2d 132 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 12, 1966

As was stated in Matter of Lido Links Homes v. … of Levin v.

People ex rel. Root v. Board of Sup'rs of Steuben Co.

30 N.Y.S. 729 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 17, 1894

If the board of supervisors of any county shall deem any town in the county to be unreasonably burdened by its expenses for the construction and repair of its bridges the board may cause a sum of money not exceeding $2,000 … Stowell, Supervisor, v. Same Defendant, as the material facts and questions involved are the same in both cases. All concur.

People ex rel. Park Circle Amusement Co. v. Board of Police

36 Misc. 89 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1901

Worth v. Grant, 58 Hun, 455 , holding that the mayor might, in his discretion, refuse a license to an applicant who tendered payment of the license fee. … Schwab v. Grant, 126 N. Y. 473 , the discretion of the mayor was held not reviewable upon mandamus.

People ex rel. Vallejo v. New York State Board of Parole

130 Misc. 2d 488 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 17, 1985

(People v Cull, 10 NY2d 123, 126 ; see also, Matter of Lehman v Board of Educ., 82 AD2d 832 .) In the case of People ex rel. … 123 ; People v Widelitz, 39 Misc 2d 51 ).

Board of Education of Central School District No. 1 v. Homer

80 Misc. 2d 339 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 30, 1974

Corp. v. … The insurance company admits that in its contract of insurance with the school board it agreed to protect the board from liability for damages incurred as the result of the negligence of the board’s employees.

Lewis v. Dicker

118 Misc. 2d 28 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 29, 1982

such nature that it might be presumed the officers would commit a breach of trust in refusing to proceed’ ” had apparently occurred {supra, p 337, quoting Wilson v Brown, 269 Pa 225, 227). … Brown, 269 Pa 225, 227).

People ex rel. Holler v. Board of Contract & Apportionment

2 How. Pr. 423 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 15, 1885

contract, which, as I have already said, they must let to the lowest bidder (charter, † pp. 87, 88, secs. 3, 4, 5); when a law for repaving has been passed and proposals issued, bids received, and, by resolution of the board … , the contract let to the lowest bidder, he then has a right to go on and have the proper written contract made out in accordance with his bid SO accepted, and the board has no right to rescind the resolu *425 tion awarding

Board of Supervisors v. People ex rel. McMaster & Harvey

7 Hill & Den. 504 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1844

Beers, ( 23 Wend. 103 ,) and Purdy v. … As *510 to the first, Warner v.

In re Brooks

101 Misc. 715 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1917

Brown v. Board of Supervisors, Suffolk County, 216 N. Y. 732 , reversing the decision of the Appellate Division, second *716 department, reported in 170 App. … The Brown case does not refer to the Garvin case. Section 358 of the Election Law relates to general elections.

People ex rel. Cook v. Board of Metropolitan Police

26 How. Pr. 450 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1864

Caspian Realty, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Appeals

17 Misc. 3d 694 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 28, 2007

of discretion (Matter of Pecoraro v Board of Appeals of Town of Hempstead, 2 NY3d 608, 613 [2004]; Matter of Ifrah v Utschig, 98 NY2d 304, 308 [2002]; Matter of Martino v Board of Zoning Appeals of Inc. … Osgood, supra-, Matter of Martino v Board of Zoning Appeals of Inc.