Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnysupct

10,000+ results

0.53s

  • People ex rel. McCully v. Board of Commissioners of Excise

    17 N.Y.S. 945 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 18, 1892

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Plainview-Old Bethpage Congress of Teachers v. Board of Education

    78 Misc. 2d 975 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1973

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Van Hise v. Board of Police Commissioners

    63 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 648 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1890

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Supervisors of Alexander v. Board of Supervisors

    7 Hill & Den. 171 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1844

    But it is insisted on the part of the board of supervisors that although the county is answerable in the first instance, the expense is ultimately chargeable upon the town of Alexander, where the lunatic had acquired a legal … We think the board of supervisors erred in charging the expense upon the town of Alexander, and a mandamus must therefore be awarded; Motion granted.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Episcopal Church of St. Peter v. Varian

    28 Barb. 644 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 14, 1858

    By the Court, Brown, J. 1. The bond in question is a substantial compliance with the requirements of section 222 of the code. … White and others v. Skinner, 13 John. 307 . Meech v. Smith, 7 Wend. 315 .)

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • New York State Labor Relations Board v. National Beauty Parlors, Inc.

    180 Misc. 997 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 29, 1943

    Petitioner, New York State Labor Relations Board, seeks to compel compliance with its order. … In its finding the Board was indisputably correct. There was no bona fide rental intended or effected. The relationship remained as it was before — employer and employee.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Reddick v. Board of Regents of the University of New York

    58 Misc. 2d 970 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 13, 1969

    (Matter of Jablon v. Board of Regents, *972 271 App. Div. 369 , 373 [3d. Dept.], affd. 296 N. Y. 1027 ). … The burden of proof is upon the applicant.’ ” (Matter of Jablon v. Board of Regents, supra, p. 373 .)

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Claim of Morse v. Board of Education of New York

    34 Misc. 2d 190 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 12, 1962

    As authority for this contention the Board of Education cites the case of Goglas v. New York City Housing Auth. (13 A D 2d 939, affd. 11 N Y 2d 680). … However, here it appears that counsel was diligent but could not readily discern in the maze of separate, distinct, municipal corporate agencies, that the Board of Education was involved.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Adams v. Klapper

    182 Misc. 2d 51 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 26, 1999

    there is a sufficient number of valid signatures independent of those fraudulently procured” (Matter of MacDougall v Board of Elections, 133 AD2d 198 , citing Matter of Flower v D'Apice, 104 AD2d 578 , affd 63 NY2d 715 ; … The court thus invalidates the signatures taken by Staton, Bortnick, Elsie Ortiz, Beverly Brown, Alysande Brown and Veola Glover, totaling approximately 700 signatures, leaving respondent well below the required number of

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Cook v. Nelson

    186 Misc. 1018 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 19, 1946

    (Park Square Automobile S. v. American Locomotive Co., 222 F. 979 .)

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Board of Education v. City of New York Human Resources Administration

    110 Misc. 2d 898 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 24, 1981

    No. 8, 59 AD2d 761 ; Matter of Jeter v Ellenville Cent. School Dist., 50 AD2d 366 , affd 41 NY2d 283 ; Matter of Board of Educ. v Allen, 29 AD2d 24 ). … Matter of Brown v Union Free School Dist. No. 8, 88 Misc 2d 755 , affd 59 AD2d 761 , supra).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Snyder v. New York State Board of Regents

    31 Misc. 3d 556 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 29, 2010

    of IBM, the United Way and the Coca-Cola Company; and (v) service as a board member of the Advertising Council and a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. … v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Park Circle Amusement Co. v. Board of Police

    36 Misc. 89 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1901

    Worth v. Grant, 58 Hun, 455 , holding that the mayor might, in his discretion, refuse a license to an applicant who tendered payment of the license fee. … Schwab v. Grant, 126 N. Y. 473 , the discretion of the mayor was held not reviewable upon mandamus.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Yonkers Lodge, Benevolent & Protective Order of Elks v. Board of Education

    179 Misc. 834 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 27, 1942

    That section has no application to a contract made by the Board of Education. The Board of Education is not a department of the city government. (Matter of Divisich v. Marshall, 281 N. Y. 170 .) … (Keating v. Gunther, 10 N. Y. S. 734, affd. 129 N. Y. 659 ; Penn. Steel Co. v. Title Guar. & Trust Co., 193 N.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Hall v. President & Board of Trustees

    4 Silv. Sup. 538 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 7, 1889

    In Howland v. Eldredge, 48 N. … In People v. Chapin, 103 N. Y. 635 , and in People v. Same, 104 N.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Education of Central School District No. 1 v. Cole

    176 Misc. 509 · New York Supreme Court · May 14, 1941

    The Commissioner has general jurisdiction over the board of education. (Education Law, §§ 90, 94.) … See, also, Matter of Levitch v. Board of Education, 243 N. Y. 373 , and Bullock v. Cooley, 225 id. 566.) A final order may be submitted confirming the orders • of the Commissioner. No costs.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Cook v. Board of Metropolitan Police

    26 How. Pr. 450 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1864

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Sands Point Academy & Country Day School v. Board of Education

    63 Misc. 2d 276 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 9, 1970

    In Matter of Brown v. … in laying out routes and measuring same is a matter of discretion with such board (Matter of Knopp v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Strippoli v. Bickal

    42 Misc. 2d 475 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 1, 1964

    Y. 541 [1941]; Matter of Cantor v. Board of Educ., 262 App. Div. 861 [1941]; Matter of Leone v. Hunter, 21 Misc 2d 750 [1959]; Matter of Balaban v. Board of Educ. of City of N. … Board of Educ., supra.) These cases recognize the landmark decision of Brown v. Board of Educ. ( 347 U. S. 483 [1954], 349 U.

    Reversed on other grounds by Strippoli v. Bickal, 21 A.D.2d 365 (1964)Cited 6 timesPublished
  • White v. Board of Education, Union Free School District No. 3

    74 Misc. 2d 171 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 4, 1973

    Brown, 5 N Y 2d 51 [1958]), or because it was arbitrary and capricious (Matter of Le Tarte v. Board of Educ. of Lake Pleasant Cent. School Dist., 65 Misc 2d 147 [Sup. … City v. Board of Educ. of City of N. Y., 23 N Y 2d 458 [1969]).

    Cited 4 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.