Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.94s
People ex rel. Merchants' National Bank v. Board of Aldermen
48 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 642 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1886
Cited 0 timesPublishedStark v. Board of Education of Utica City School District
28 Misc. 2d 1043 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 26, 1961
board’s property. … Co. v. Luckenbach S. S. Co., 11 A D 2d 220.)
Cited 0 timesPublished4 Denio 469 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1847
(Gibbons v. Ogden, 9 Wheat. 189 , et seq.; Brown v The State of Maryland, 12 id. 445 to 448; City of New York v. Miln, 11 Pet. 134 to 136, 141, 154, 5.) … It seems to me to rest on the precise principle which was stated as one ground of the judgment in the case of Brown v. The State of *480 Maryland.
Cited 10 timesPublishedAshton v. Board of Education of Central School District No. 1
44 Misc. 2d 780 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 3, 1963
Hylan v. Finegan, 227 N. Y. 219 ; Matter of Miller v. Gould, 121 Misc. 270 .) … (City of Hudson v. Board of Educ. of City of Hudson, 158 Misc. 583 ; Byrne v. Barrett, 268 N. Y. 199 .)
Cited 3 timesPublishedCity Bank Farmers Trust Co. v. Board of Standards & Appeals
184 Misc. 512 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 3, 1944
It is not disputed that Conservation Order L. 41 issued by the War Production Board on April 9, 1942 ( 7 Fed. … , the date of the withdrawal of the respondents ’ appeal, as well as on August 4, 1942, the date of the approval of the petitioner’s application and plans for the erection of its theatre, the order of the War Production Board
Cited 0 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. McCombs v. Board Auditors of Deer Park
20 N.Y.S. 268 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1892
Cited 0 timesPublishedNew York, Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. Board of Supervisors
37 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 222 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1883
Cited 0 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. Second Avenue Railroad v. Board of Commissioners
38 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 316 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1883
Proceedings and order of the Board of Commissioners of Public Parks affirmed, with costs.
Cited 0 timesPublishedPresident of the Chemung Canal Bank v. Board of Supervisors
1 How. Pr. 162 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1845
Cited 0 timesPublished194 Misc. 873 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 26, 1949
(Matter of Woods v. Finegan, 246 App. Div. 271 ; Brown v. Craig, 209 App. Div. 11 .) … V, § 6; Hurley v. Board of Education of City of N. Y., 270 N. Y. 275 ; Matter of Carow v. Board of Education, 272 N. Y. 341 .) The Civil Service Commission is precluded from so doing by law. (Brown v. Craig, supra.)
Cited 2 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. Criscolla v. Adams
96 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 284 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1895
Present — Brown, P. J., Dykman and Pratt, JJ. Brown, P. J., dissented in the Criscolla case. … If the view which I entertain is correct, the board could not then lawfully appoint a third interpreter.
Cited 0 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. Sinclair v. Warden, Rikers Island Correctional Center
152 Misc. 2d 928 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 19, 1991
Brown v New York State Div. of Parole, 70 NY2d, at 399 .) … Brown v Smith, 115 AD2d 255 [4th Dept 1985]; People ex rel.
Cited 1 timesPublished35 How. Pr. 81 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1867
By the first section of the act of Aprid 23d, 1867, commonly called the city “tax levy” for that year, the board of supervisors of the county of New York, among other sums of money, were authorized and directed to levy and … By the 5th section, it is declared that “the mayor, aider-men and commonalty of the city of New York shall not be liable upon any contract made, or expenditure authorized, or liability incurred, by any board, department,
Cited 0 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. Daniels v. Board of Commissioners of Excise
3 Park. Cr. 501 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1857
The board for Albany county having already been in session ten days, have no further power to act as such board of excise during the present year. The motion must therefore be denied. Motion denied.
Cited 0 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. Village of Fulton v. Board of Supervisors
3 N.Y.S. 751 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1888
In the case of People v. Kearney, 47 Hun, 129 , this-court had occasion to examine that statute, and it was there held that the statute did not prohibit the holding of courts on Saturday afternoon. … Nichols v. Kelsey, 13 Civil Proc. R. 154 ; Fries v. Coar, Id. 152 . This leaves for consideration only the question whether the writ could be-properly granted at an-adjourned special term of this court.
Cited 0 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. Tenth National Bank v. Board of Apportionment
5 Thomp. & Cook 382 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1875
Without a debt being due to the relator of the description given in the law, the board had no right to provide for the issuing of bonds on its account, and the relator itself had no interest in the act being done. … See also cases cited in People v. Green, ante, p. 376, decided at this term. A controversy of this character appeared concerning the relator’s demand from the papers produced upon the hearing of the application.
Cited 0 timesPublishedPlainview-Old Bethpage Congress of Teachers v. Board of Education
78 Misc. 2d 975 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1973
Cited 0 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. Van Hise v. Board of Police Commissioners
63 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 648 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1890
Cited 0 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. Supervisors of Alexander v. Board of Supervisors
7 Hill & Den. 171 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1844
But it is insisted on the part of the board of supervisors that although the county is answerable in the first instance, the expense is ultimately chargeable upon the town of Alexander, where the lunatic had acquired a legal … We think the board of supervisors erred in charging the expense upon the town of Alexander, and a mandamus must therefore be awarded; Motion granted.
Cited 0 timesPublishedEpiscopal Church of St. Peter v. Varian
28 Barb. 644 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 14, 1858
By the Court, Brown, J. 1. The bond in question is a substantial compliance with the requirements of section 222 of the code. … White and others v. Skinner, 13 John. 307 . Meech v. Smith, 7 Wend. 315 .)
Cited 2 timesPublished
Ask Donna