Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnysupct

10,000+ results

0.94s

  • People ex rel. Merchants' National Bank v. Board of Aldermen

    48 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 642 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1886

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Stark v. Board of Education of Utica City School District

    28 Misc. 2d 1043 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 26, 1961

    board’s property. … Co. v. Luckenbach S. S. Co., 11 A D 2d 220.)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People v. Brooks

    4 Denio 469 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1847

    (Gibbons v. Ogden, 9 Wheat. 189 , et seq.; Brown v The State of Maryland, 12 id. 445 to 448; City of New York v. Miln, 11 Pet. 134 to 136, 141, 154, 5.) … It seems to me to rest on the precise principle which was stated as one ground of the judgment in the case of Brown v. The State of *480 Maryland.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Ashton v. Board of Education of Central School District No. 1

    44 Misc. 2d 780 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 3, 1963

    Hylan v. Finegan, 227 N. Y. 219 ; Matter of Miller v. Gould, 121 Misc. 270 .) … (City of Hudson v. Board of Educ. of City of Hudson, 158 Misc. 583 ; Byrne v. Barrett, 268 N. Y. 199 .)

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • City Bank Farmers Trust Co. v. Board of Standards & Appeals

    184 Misc. 512 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 3, 1944

    It is not disputed that Conservation Order L. 41 issued by the War Production Board on April 9, 1942 ( 7 Fed. … , the date of the withdrawal of the respondents ’ appeal, as well as on August 4, 1942, the date of the approval of the petitioner’s application and plans for the erection of its theatre, the order of the War Production Board

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. McCombs v. Board Auditors of Deer Park

    20 N.Y.S. 268 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1892

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • New York, Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. Board of Supervisors

    37 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 222 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1883

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Second Avenue Railroad v. Board of Commissioners

    38 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 316 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1883

    Proceedings and order of the Board of Commissioners of Public Parks affirmed, with costs.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • President of the Chemung Canal Bank v. Board of Supervisors

    1 How. Pr. 162 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1845

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Cash v. Bates

    194 Misc. 873 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 26, 1949

    (Matter of Woods v. Finegan, 246 App. Div. 271 ; Brown v. Craig, 209 App. Div. 11 .) … V, § 6; Hurley v. Board of Education of City of N. Y., 270 N. Y. 275 ; Matter of Carow v. Board of Education, 272 N. Y. 341 .) The Civil Service Commission is precluded from so doing by law. (Brown v. Craig, supra.)

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Criscolla v. Adams

    96 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 284 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1895

    Present — Brown, P. J., Dykman and Pratt, JJ. Brown, P. J., dissented in the Criscolla case. … If the view which I entertain is correct, the board could not then lawfully appoint a third interpreter.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Sinclair v. Warden, Rikers Island Correctional Center

    152 Misc. 2d 928 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 19, 1991

    Brown v New York State Div. of Parole, 70 NY2d, at 399 .) … Brown v Smith, 115 AD2d 255 [4th Dept 1985]; People ex rel.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brady v. Mayor of New York

    35 How. Pr. 81 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1867

    By the first section of the act of Aprid 23d, 1867, commonly called the city “tax levy” for that year, the board of supervisors of the county of New York, among other sums of money, were authorized and directed to levy and … By the 5th section, it is declared that “the mayor, aider-men and commonalty of the city of New York shall not be liable upon any contract made, or expenditure authorized, or liability incurred, by any board, department,

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Daniels v. Board of Commissioners of Excise

    3 Park. Cr. 501 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1857

    The board for Albany county having already been in session ten days, have no further power to act as such board of excise during the present year. The motion must therefore be denied. Motion denied.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Village of Fulton v. Board of Supervisors

    3 N.Y.S. 751 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1888

    In the case of People v. Kearney, 47 Hun, 129 , this-court had occasion to examine that statute, and it was there held that the statute did not prohibit the holding of courts on Saturday afternoon. … Nichols v. Kelsey, 13 Civil Proc. R. 154 ; Fries v. Coar, Id. 152 . This leaves for consideration only the question whether the writ could be-properly granted at an-adjourned special term of this court.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Tenth National Bank v. Board of Apportionment

    5 Thomp. & Cook 382 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1875

    Without a debt being due to the relator of the description given in the law, the board had no right to provide for the issuing of bonds on its account, and the relator itself had no interest in the act being done. … See also cases cited in People v. Green, ante, p. 376, decided at this term. A controversy of this character appeared concerning the relator’s demand from the papers produced upon the hearing of the application.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Plainview-Old Bethpage Congress of Teachers v. Board of Education

    78 Misc. 2d 975 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1973

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Van Hise v. Board of Police Commissioners

    63 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 648 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1890

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Supervisors of Alexander v. Board of Supervisors

    7 Hill & Den. 171 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1844

    But it is insisted on the part of the board of supervisors that although the county is answerable in the first instance, the expense is ultimately chargeable upon the town of Alexander, where the lunatic had acquired a legal … We think the board of supervisors erred in charging the expense upon the town of Alexander, and a mandamus must therefore be awarded; Motion granted.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Episcopal Church of St. Peter v. Varian

    28 Barb. 644 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 14, 1858

    By the Court, Brown, J. 1. The bond in question is a substantial compliance with the requirements of section 222 of the code. … White and others v. Skinner, 13 John. 307 . Meech v. Smith, 7 Wend. 315 .)

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.