Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.26s
Meditrust Financial Services Corp. v. New York Crime Victims Board
163 Misc. 2d 708 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 10, 1995
Francis Hosp. v D’ Elia, supra; Matter of Feight v Lesser, supra.) … (Klostermann v Cuomo, 61 NY2d 525, 540 , citing People ex rel. Schau v McWilliams, 185 NY 92, 100 .)
Cited 1 timesPublishedWaldbaum's 1, Inc. v. Board of Assessors
100 Misc. 2d 578 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 8, 1979
(See Matter of City of Lackawanna v State Bd. of Equalization & Assessment, 21 AD2d 318, 321 .) … The court grants respondents’ cross motion and finds that both the disputed cold storage area and equipment described on the assessment cards of the respondent board of assessors are assessable.
Cited 0 timesPublishedSteinhauser v. Niagara Falls Board of Education
81 Misc. 2d 606 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 20, 1975
Board of Educ. of City of N.Y. ( 1 AD2d 362 , affd 3 NY2d 871 ); Smith v Equitable Life Assur. … Co. v Voigt ( 36 AD2d 1011 ).
Cited 0 timesPublishedSierra Construction Co. v. Board of Appeals
33 Misc. 2d 414 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 24, 1961
(Matter of Diocese of Rochester v. Planning Bd. of Town of Brighton, 1 N Y 2d, 508, 520.) … The only issue which Special Term is empowered to decide is whether the determination of the board was the result of prejudice, or was otherwise arbitrary or capricious. (Del Vecchio v. Tuomey, 283 App.
Cited 0 timesPublishedState Board of Equalization & Assessment v. Kerwick
92 Misc. 2d 547 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 27, 1977
(See Matter of State Bd. of Equalization & Assessment v Kerwick, 91 Misc 2d 152 .) Respondent assessors move to dismiss the petition. … (Van Devanter v Long Island City, 139 NY 133 .)
Cited 0 timesPublishedWest End Equities v. Conciliation & Appeals Board
88 Misc. 2d 968 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 8, 1976
Application pursuant to CPLR article 78 for an order annulling a determination of respondent Conciliation and Appeals Board on the ground that it is arbitrary, capricious and contrary to law, is dismissed. … (Matter of Mounting & Finishing Co. v McGoldrick, 294 NY 104 .)
Cited 0 timesPublished8 N.Y.S. 121 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 11, 1889
See pages 118-123, and opinion of Justice Brown, pages 124, 125. … As said by J ustice Brown in Austin v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedFiore v. Board of Education Retirement System
75 Misc. 2d 341 · New York Supreme Court · May 1, 1973
of Brady v. … J., Feb. 26, 1973, p. 2, col. 2); and the recent decision by the Appellate Division, First Department, in Matter of Centauro v. Board of Trustees of N. Y. Fire Dept. Article 1-B Pension Fund (41 A D 2d 626).
Cited 0 timesPublishedRabin v. Onondaga County Board of Elections
67 Misc. 2d 754 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 12, 1971
(Pope v. Williams, 193 U. S. 621 ; Oregon v. Mitchell, 400 U. S. 112 .) … (Gary v. Sanders, 372 U. S. 368, 379 .)
Cited 0 timesPublishedVan Lengen v. Town Board of Onondaga
44 Misc. 2d 479 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 18, 1964
Co. v. Davenport et al., 91 N. Y. 574 at page 585; People ex rel. Collins v. Spicer, 99 N. Y. 225 at *483 page 233 * * *; Bell v. The Mayor, etc., of New York City, 105 N. Y. 139 , at page 144 ”. (Panzer v. Horan, 83 N. … (Spencer v. Myers, 150 N. Y. 269, 275 .) Also, “Public policy and legislative intent should be taken into consideration in interpreting statutes (Walton v. Cotton, 19 How. [60 U. S.] 355) ’ ’ cited in Huss v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedSturay Realty Corp. v. Board of Assessors
48 Misc. 2d 2 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 19, 1965
(See Schuster v. Schuster, 235 App. Div. 239 .)
Cited 0 timesPublished136 Misc. 641 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 17, 1930
Brown v. Freisch, *644 215 N. Y. 356, 369 ; People ex rel. Widmeyer v. Grunert, 122 Misc. 1, 4 .) No such ballots are here involved. … Brown v. Board of Supervisors ( 170 App. Div. 364 ) dealt “ with the protested or wholly blank or void ballots.” People ex rel. Colne v. Smith ( 188 App.
Cited 4 timesPublishedBojaco Realty Corp. v. Board of Assessors
53 Misc. 2d 69 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 10, 1967
With respect to the right of the Board of Assessors to apportion property under these circumstances, section 603 of the County Government Law of Nassau County provides that the board “ shall make such changes in the county … Co. v. Board of Taxes & Assessments, 166 N. Y. 154 ; Bierman v. Boyland, 125 N. Y. S. 2d 86; Matter of Petley v. Hall, 48 Misc 2d 807 ).
Cited 0 timesPublishedKemp v. New York State Parole Board
46 Misc. 2d 803 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 26, 1965
Nowhere in tlie. record is there any showing that (be board violated any positive statutory requirement, and, as was said in Matter of Hines v. State Bd. of Parole ( 293 N. … In Matter of O’Connor v. State Bd. of Parole ( 270 App.
Cited 0 timesPublishedNew York State Labor Relations Board v. Greif Realty Corporation
188 Misc. 549 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 27, 1947
(See, also, National Labor Relations Board v. Biles Coleman L. Co., 98 F. 2d 16 ; National Labor Relations Board v. Baldwin L. Works, 128 F. 2d 39 ; Matter of N. Y. State Labor Relations Board v. Timen, 264 App. … The board is not in the strict sense a court (People ex rel. Stvift v. Luce, 204 N.
Cited 2 timesPublished13 N.Y. St. Rep. 265 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 3, 1888
further follows that at the trial the plaintiff showed the title to be not only doubtful, but bad, and that for that reason he was entitled to recover within the rule applicable to actions at law as laid down in O'Reilly v. … King ( 28 How., 408 ), and The Methodist Episcopal Church Home v. Thompson (52 N. Y. Supr. Ct., 321).
Cited 0 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. Gibson v. Board of Assessors of Pulteney
101 N.Y.S. 176 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 3, 1906
Supp. 797 ; Wilcox v. Quinby, 73 Hun, 524 , 26 N. Y. Supp. 114 ; Deraismes v. Deraismes, 72 N. Y. 154 . … Muller v. Board of Assessors of the City of Brooklyn, 93 N. Y. 308 .
Cited 1 timesPublishedIn re the Arbitration between Brown-Turner, Inc. & Complete Machinery & Equipment Co.
4 Misc. 2d 786 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 3, 1955
performance under the contract shall continue”, Brown-Turner itself has breached the contract, and is therefore not entitled to demand arbitration. … In response, Brown-Turner, while admitting nonpayment as such, claims that poor and delayed work on Complete Machinery’s part in violation of the terms of the contract has given rise to a counterclaim in Brown-Turner’s favor
Cited 3 timesPublishedBoard of Fire Commissioners v. New York Interurban Water Co.
113 Misc. 459 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1920
Pond v. New Rochelle Water Co., 183 N. Y. 330 ; Matter of International Railway Co. v. Rann, 224 id. 83, 88; Farnsworth v. Boro Oil & Gas Co., supra; People ex rel. Brush v. N. Y. Suburban Water Co., 38 App. Div. 413 . … Pelham Manor v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedGreat Neck Suburban Hotel Corp. v. Board of Zoning & Appeals
32 Misc. 2d 1082 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 30, 1962
(Matter of Diocese of Rochester v. Planning Bd., 1 N Y 2d 508, 520). Therefore, the contention that the ordinance itself is unconstitutional must be disregarded. … (See Matter of Forrest v. Evershed, 7 N Y 2d 256, 261, 262.)
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna