Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.38s
People ex rel. Rumph v. Board of Sup'rs
34 N.Y.S. 1128 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 26, 1895
BROWN, P. J. The material facts set forth in the petition in this proceeding are as follows: In the spring of 1894, William V. B. … People v. Board of Apportionment, 64 N. Y. 627 ; People v. Brush, supra. We must assume, therefore, in this case, notwithstanding the allegations of the petition, that Mr.
Cited 0 timesPublishedJ.R.D. Management Corp. v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals Board
117 Misc. 2d 459 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 4, 1983
Corp. v Conciliation & Appeals Bd. of City of N. Y. … Tenants Assn. v New York City Conciliation & Appeals Bd., NYLJ, Oct. 30, 1978, p 7, col 5.)
Cited 2 timesPublished174 Misc. 2d 552 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 1, 1997
1979], affd 49 NY2d 850 , citing Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222 , 231). … Petitioner’s reliance on cases such as Matter of Brown v Krone (supra) is misplaced.
Cited 3 timesPublishedNew York State Labor Relations Board v. Marlene Transportation Co.
207 Misc. 677 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 29, 1955
Matter of Holland v. Edwards, 307 N. Y. 38, 45 ). The finding of unfair labor practices made by the State board is amply supported by substantial evidence and is conclusive upon this court (Matter of Stork Restaurant v. … Y. 256 , 267 ; Republic Aviation Corp. v. Board, 324 U. S. 793 ).
Cited 4 timesPublishedSantandrea v. Board of Trustees of Hudson Valley Community College
25 Misc. 3d 429 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 24, 2009
In Butterfield v Board of Trustees of Schenectady County Community Coll., the court held generally that notice of claim requirements are a condition precedent to a suit against the trustees of a community college ( 131 AD2d … In Stockwicz v Board of Trustees of Corning Community Coll., the court did not make a final determination as to whether CPLR 311 or 312 applied ( 61 AD2d 883 [4th Dept 1978]).
Cited 1 timesPublishedFurman Avenue Realty Corp. v. Board of Standards & Appeals
9 Misc. 2d 566 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 14, 1949
Div. 870 ; McCory v. Langdon, 269 App. Div. 701 ). … Corp. v. Murdock, 285 N. Y. 298 ; Navin v. Early, 56 N. Y. S. 2d 346.)
Cited 1 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. Hatzel v. Board of Supervisors
58 How. Pr. 141 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1878
The relator will have an opportunity of contesting the right of his opponent before the newly-elected board of aider-men. … The action of the board of aldermen under the provision of the charter just adverted to, is subject to the review of any court of competent jurisdiction.
Cited 0 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. Keene v. Board of Sup'rs
36 N.Y.S. 1131 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 2, 1895
It was said by the court of appeals in this case that the duty imposed by the statute upon the boards of supervisors of the two counties is plainly demonstrative and mandatory, and not discretionary. … People v. Board of Sup’rs of Queens Co., 142 N. Y. 277 , 36 N. E. 1062 ; People v. Board of Sup’rs of Otsego Co., 51 N. Y. 401 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. Foley v. Board of Education
32 N.Y.S. 377 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 11, 1895
People v. Robb, 126 N. Y. 180 , 27 N. E. 267 ; People v. Lathrop, 142 N. Y. 113 , 36 N. E. 805 . The sufficiency of the reasons for the exercise of the power of removal must be determined primarily by the board. … In the case of People v. Lathrop it was said that the court had nothing to do with the reason or justice of the removal.
Cited 0 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. Keene v. Board of Supervisors
24 N.Y.S. 563 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 28, 1893
Hill v. Supervisors, 12 N. Y. 52 . … Under this last provision of the constitution, the legislature may invest the boards of supervisors in this state with power to lay out and open highways. People v. Board of Sup’rs of Queens County, 112 N.
Cited 0 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. O'Mara v. Board of Supervisors
16 N.Y.S. 254 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1891
People v. Supervisors, 45 N. Y. 196 . … Knapp v. Brown, 45 N. Y. 209 ; People v. Supervisors, 33 Hun, 307 ; People v. Supervisors, 3 How. Pr. (N. S.) 242.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBoard of Higher Education v. Bankers Trust Co.
86 Misc. 560 · New York Supreme Court · May 7, 1976
Co. v Groveland State Bank, 44 AD2d 182, 186-188 , mod, 37 NY2d 252 ; Arrow Bldrs. Supply Corp. v Royal Nat. Bank of N. Y. 21 NY2d 428, 431 ). … Rich (see Chartered Bank v American Trust Co., 48 Misc 2d 314 ).
Cited 0 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. Nugent v. Board of Supervisors
65 Misc. 327 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1909
Y. 434 ; McGaffm v. City of Cohoes, 74 id. 387. … I have come to the conclusion that the statute in question simply provides that the allowance to the sheriff for maintenance, board and care shall cover board, washing, services, and any and all charges which he can make
Cited 0 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. Gibb v. Board of Education
5 N.Y.S. 392 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 25, 1889
In the case of People v. … See, also, People v. Thompson, 99 N. Y. 641 , 1 N. E. Rep. 542.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMetropolitan Life Insurance v. New York State Labor Relations Board
168 Misc. 948 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 25, 1938
(People v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co., 169 App. Div. 32 ; Van Vlaanderen v. Peyet Silk Dyeing Corp., 278 Fed. 993 .) … (Labor Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp., 301 U.
Cited 4 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. McGrath v. Board of Supervisors
6 N.Y.S. 153 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 3, 1889
committed; (2) where the proceedings are for felonies; and (3) ‘ where the proceedings or trial for the offense shall be had before any court of oyer and terminer, or general sessions of the peace.’ ” The case of People v. … The case of People v. Supervisors, 67 N. Y. 330 , bears no analogy, and has no application to this case. That was the case of a sheriff’s bill for receiving, boarding, and discharging prisoners.
Cited 0 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. Beaty v. Board of Police
9 Abb. Pr. 257 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1859
Evarts, David Dudley Field, and Brown, Hall & Vanderpoel, for the appellants.— I. The order is erroneous, because it departs altogether from the motion, and the notice of motion. … V.
Cited 0 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. Banks v. Board of Education
2 Abb. Pr. 177 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1866
unworthy person, guilty of the most flagrant violation of his duty, could, by voluntary action on his part, in many cases escape a trial, and the deserved ignominy of a dismissal ” (The People on the relation of McCune v. … The Board of Police, 20 Barb., 501 ). No vacancy having actually existed, the board of education were not bound to take any notice of the nomination by the trustees. II.
Cited 0 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. Barrows v. Board of Supervisors
23 How. Pr. 395 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 3, 1862
I overrule the demurrer in this case, on the ground that the relators have not presented their claim to the board of supervisors, to be audited by them, as required by the provisions of chapter 83, Laws 1861, p. 158. … to the boards to be audited by them.
Cited 0 timesPublishedAustin v. Board of Trustees of School District No. 5
68 Misc. 538 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 15, 1910
Woodward v. Draper, 67 Misc. Rep. 460, 465 . … Underhill v. Skinner, 74 App. Div. 58 , 61, declared that “ The party who feels himself aggrieved, if he has a clear legal right, may no doubt enforce it in the courts.”
Cited 5 timesPublished
Ask Donna