Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnysupct

10,000+ results

2.01s

  • People ex rel. Ryan v. Board of Police Commissioners

    34 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 52 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1882

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Gilhooly v. Board of Police Commissioners

    30 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 351 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1880

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Kerwick v. New York State Board of Equalization & Assessment

    114 Misc. 2d 928 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 20, 1982

    No such assessment shall be valid for any purpose without the approval of the state board”. (Emphasis supplied.) … (Matter of State Bd. of Equalization & Assessment v Kerwick, 72 AD2d 292, 299 .)

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Smith v. New York State Board

    91 Misc. 2d 486 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 28, 1976

    It is the feelings of this panel of the Parole Board that the best kind of treatment for you would be for you to remain in the institution where you can gain some help for your emotional and physical problems.” … The statutory standard for parole release contained in section 213 of the Correction Law is that the Board of Parole be "of the opinion that there is reasonable probability that, if such prisoner is released, he will live

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Miller v. Board of Police Commissioners

    13 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 229 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1875

    dissented, because the adjudication of the police commissioners was based upon the relator’s confession, which was considered by Judge Lawrence to have been so explained in and by the subsequent papers furnished to the board

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Hunter v. Board of Fire Commissioners

    33 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 473 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1882

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Fallon v. Board of Police Commissioners

    35 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 241 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1882

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Emerick v. Board of Fire Commissioners

    30 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 317 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1880

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Davis v. Excise Board of Oswego

    54 N.Y. St. Rep. 937 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 23, 1893

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • St. Matthew Church of Christ, Disciples of Christ, Inc. v. Creech

    196 Misc. 2d 843 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 18, 2003

    Washington and sister-in-law Ethel Brown. Consequently, Bishop Creech did not accept Phair’s authority as the pastor of St. Matthew. In response, Bishop Creech called a meeting of NEDA’s Board of Elders at St. … NEDA’s Constitution, article V, § 7, however, relegates the authority of the “Council/Elders Board” to religious matters “pertaining to the hearings and disciplinary [sic] of ministers” (see also NEDA bylaws § 13).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Acer v. Westcott

    1 Lans. 193 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1869

    Brown, by wMch Curtiss acquired such title. … (Brush v. Ware, 15 Pet., 93, 111 ; West v. Reid, 2 Hare, 249, 260, 261; Jumel v. Jumel, 7 Paige, 591 ; Briggs v. Palmer, 20 Barb., 392 ; S. C. on appeal, 20 N. Y., 15 , and 21 id., 574.)

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • A. S. Reynolds Electric Co. v. Board of Education

    46 Misc. 2d 140 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 8, 1965

    of Education of the City of New York (hereinafter referred to as the Board) to award to petitioner the contract for electric wiring and standard illuminating fixtures. … The Board has the power to purchase, repair, remodel, improve or enlarge school buildings or other buildings or sites, and to construct new buildings (Education Law, § 2556, subd. 1).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Kopp v. Board of Police Commissioners

    4 N.Y. Crim. 300 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1886

    No written, charges were preferred agamst the relator, but a resolution was passed by the board in the following form: “ Resolved, That patrolman Robert Kopp, twenty-second precinct, be directed to appear before this board … And the third point presented is that there was no competent evidence before the board to show a conviction.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Exchange Bank v. Board of Education

    46 Barb. 598 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 3, 1866

    The Lockport City Bank v. This defendant, (a) it is decisive in the present case.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Wood v. Board of Town Canvassers

    32 Misc. 131 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1900

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Baker v. Board of Audit & Apportionment

    3 Thomp. & Cook 754 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1874

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Kent v. Board of Fire Commissioners

    42 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 670 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1885

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Swift v. Board of Police Commissioners

    38 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 40 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1883

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Kaung v. Board of Managers of Biltmore Towers Condominium Ass'n

    22 Misc. 3d 854 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 10, 2008

    Owners Assn, v Liscia, 169 AD2d 712 [2d Dept 1991]; Lesal Assoc, v Board of Mgrs. of Downing Ct. … “[T]he aim is a practical interpretation of the expressions of the parties to the end that there be a ‘realization of [their] reasonable expectations’ ” (Brown Bros. Elec. Contrs. v Beam Constr.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • United Artists Eastern Theatres, Inc. v. Board of Assessors

    76 Misc. 2d 26 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 8, 1973

    Y. v. Christensen, 24 N Y 2d 1002.) The petitioner stresses People ex rel. Byler v. … Bank v. Purdy ( 196 N. Y. 270 ).

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.