Case law

People ex rel. Russell v. County Board of Canvassers

53 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 390 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1887

He presented it to the Board of County Canvassers, and that body proceeded to take action upon it. … Order affirmed with costs and the board of canvassers directed to use the, return filed with the county clerk.

Anderson v. Board of Directors of the Powelton Club

183 Misc. 2d 200 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 16, 1999

Pursuant to its by-laws, the Club is governed by a board of directors. … These rights must be afforded even in the absence of by-laws (see, Matter of Briggs v Technocracy, Inc., 85 NYS2d 735 ).

Bryan v. Town Board of the Town of Brighton

133 Misc. 315 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 8, 1928

Hayes v. Waldo, 212 N. Y. 156, 162 ; People ex rel. Hunt v. Hall, supra; People ex rel. Winspear v. Kreinheder, 197 App. Div. 887 .) … This statute authorizes a majority of the members of the town board to hear and determine the charges preferred against the petitioner. (People ex rel. Pond v. Board of Trustees, 4 App. Div. 399 .)

New York State Labor Relations Board v. Marlene Transportation Co.

207 Misc. 677 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 29, 1955

Matter of Holland v. Edwards, 307 N. Y. 38, 45 ). The finding of unfair labor practices made by the State board is amply supported by substantial evidence and is conclusive upon this court (Matter of Stork Restaurant v. … Y. 256 , 267 ; Republic Aviation Corp. v. Board, 324 U. S. 793 ).

Brown Bark I, L.P. v. Metroflor Transportation Services, Inc.

18 Misc. 3d 513 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 30, 2007

(Byrnes v Scott, 175 AD2d 786, 787 [1st Dept 1991]; Gibson v American Export Isbrandtsen Lines, 125 AD2d 65, 74 [1st Dept 1987].) … (Kennerly v Campbell Chain Co., Campbell Chain Div. McGraw-Edison Co., 133 AD2d 669, 670 [2d Dept 1987].) *518 Finally, defendants do not contest the validity of the transaction between Brown Bark I and Bank of America.

People ex rel. Keene v. Board of Sup'rs

36 N.Y.S. 1131 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 2, 1895

It was said by the court of appeals in this case that the duty imposed by the statute upon the boards of supervisors of the two counties is plainly demonstrative and mandatory, and not discretionary. … People v. Board of Sup’rs of Queens Co., 142 N. Y. 277 , 36 N. E. 1062 ; People v. Board of Sup’rs of Otsego Co., 51 N. Y. 401 .

People ex rel. Foley v. Board of Education

32 N.Y.S. 377 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 11, 1895

People v. Robb, 126 N. Y. 180 , 27 N. E. 267 ; People v. Lathrop, 142 N. Y. 113 , 36 N. E. 805 . The sufficiency of the reasons for the exercise of the power of removal must be determined primarily by the board. … In the case of People v. Lathrop it was said that the court had nothing to do with the reason or justice of the removal.

103 Prospect Park West, Inc. v. Conciliation & Appeals Board

67 Misc. 2d 553 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 19, 1971

This is an article 78 proceeding by petitioner landlord to review a determination of respondent “ Rent Stabilization Board ” which established the rent at the subject premises at the rent charged on May 31, 1968, plus 25%

Board of Home Missions v. Mayor of New York

98 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 642 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1895

People ex rel. Gregg v. Board of County Canvassers

8 N.Y.S. 259 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 2, 1889

The real difficulty is not in the determination of the board of county canvassers, but in an alleged criminal imposition practiced upon the board of inspectors of the election district. … People v. Canvassers, 20 Abb. H. C. 23. The difference between giving effect to the true vote of the district and suppressing it altogether is great.

People ex rel. Connolly v. Board of Police Commissioners

18 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 403 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1877

only question in the case seems to be whether the board were justified in his conviction and dismissal upon such a state of facts. … The action of the board should be affirmed and the writ quashed, with costs. Beady and Daniels, JJ., concurred. Proceedings affirmed; writ quashed, with costs.

People ex rel. Clark v. Board of Police Commissioners

33 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 474 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1882

People ex rel. Drevet v. Board of Fire Commissioners

37 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 376 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 15, 1883

Board of Education v. Bernard Associates No. 3, Inc.

28 Misc. 2d 954 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 2, 1961

This is a motion by respondent contractor for an order vacating a notice of examination before trial served upon it by petitioner Board of Education.

People ex rel. Bunge v. Board of Tax Commissioners

24 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 596 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1879

People ex rel. Ryan v. Board of Police Commissioners

34 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 52 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1882

People ex rel. Gilhooly v. Board of Police Commissioners

30 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 351 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1880

People ex rel. Keene v. Board of Supervisors

24 N.Y.S. 563 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 28, 1893

Hill v. Supervisors, 12 N. Y. 52 . … Under this last provision of the constitution, the legislature may invest the boards of supervisors in this state with power to lay out and open highways. People v. Board of Sup’rs of Queens County, 112 N.

People ex rel. Smith v. New York State Board

91 Misc. 2d 486 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 28, 1976

It is the feelings of this panel of the Parole Board that the best kind of treatment for you would be for you to remain in the institution where you can gain some help for your emotional and physical problems.” … The statutory standard for parole release contained in section 213 of the Correction Law is that the Board of Parole be "of the opinion that there is reasonable probability that, if such prisoner is released, he will live

People ex rel. Miller v. Board of Police Commissioners

13 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 229 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1875

dissented, because the adjudication of the police commissioners was based upon the relator’s confession, which was considered by Judge Lawrence to have been so explained in and by the subsequent papers furnished to the board