Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnysupct

10,000+ results

0.94s

  • Fitzpatrick v. New York State Teachers' Retirement Board

    123 Misc. 829 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 29, 1924

    Upon the report of the physician the board shall determine whether the teacher is, in fact, incapacitated. If it concludes that she is incapacitated she is entitled to be retired. Elizabeth V. … The mere glance of a trained physician would have told the story — told that Elizabeth V. Fitzpatrick could never work again. Indeed, the board does not question it.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • New York Board of Fire Underwriters v. Metropolitan Lloyds

    11 Misc. 646 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1895

    This disposition is illustrated by the remark of the chancellor in the case of Bank of Utica v. … Now, in the case at bar, while the act in question is entitled “ An act to incorporate the New York Board of Fire Underwriters,” and as its title imports confers corporate capacity .upon that board, with functions largely

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Schenectady Illuminating Co. v. Board of Supervisors

    88 Misc. 634 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1915

    The rejection of a claim by the board of supervisors of a county, on the ground that the county *639 is not liable therefor, may be reviewed by mandamus as well as by certiorari. People ex rel. Smart v. … Board of Supervisors, 66 App. Div. 66 . The writ will therefore issue as prayed for by the relator. Ordered accordingly.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lawrence Investing Co. v. Board of Review

    86 Misc. 642 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 9, 1976

    Interstate Land Holding Co. v Purdy, 206 App Div 606 , affd 236 NY 609 ; Matter of Seneca Grape Juice Corp. v Board of Assessors of Town of Lloyd, Ulster County, 34 AD2d 692 ; Matter of J. C. P. … Leasing Co. v Browne, 45 AD2d 129 ). In the last-cited case, the Third Department indicated that even where the parties stipulate to a reduction greater than the amount demanded, the settled rule may not be avoided.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Claim of Lacy v. Buffalo Board of Education

    89 Misc. 2d 255 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 7, 1977

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Atkin v. New York City Teachers' Retirement Board

    39 Misc. 2d 646 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 18, 1963

    It appears from the Tenth Annual Report of the Retirement Board for 1932 that investigation and finding were made. … Section B2CL13.0 of the Administrative Code provides that after investigation and valuation by the board actuary, the board shall ‘4 Adopt for the retirement system such mortality, service and other tables as shall be deemed

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Thomson v. Board of Supervisors

    1 How. Pr. 116 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1845

    Thought this court should not interfere; it was a question of which the board of supervisors had full jurisdiction. Motion denied.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Tanner v. Board of Supervisors

    32 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 312 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1881

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. McCarthy v. Board of Police

    34 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 467 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1882

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Hoffman v. Board of Education

    49 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 659 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1886

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Youmans v. Board of Supervisors

    9 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 102 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1874

    The record of the proceedings of said board is as follows: Resolved, That we as a board of supervisors decline to change or interfere with William Toumans’ assessment as to rents reserved in the towns of Kortright and Davenport … The board of supervisors erred in refusing to interfere with such assessments on the ground that it had no power or discretion in the matter.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Woods v. Board of Police

    39 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 465 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1884

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Archambault v. Board of Supervisors

    33 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 395 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1882

    Baker v. Supervisors ( 9 Hun, 440 ), and action continued to the Court of Appeals.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Cole v. Board of Supervisors

    2 How. Pr. 483 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1884

    His bill was presented to the board of supervisors of the county of Greene for audit, and on the rejection of such bill, upon the ground that the same was not a legal charge against the county, the relator asks that a mandamus … Indeed, it was stated upon the argument that in refusing to obey the order the county treasurer acted by direction of the board of supervisors.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Meehan v. Board of Supervisors

    52 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 588 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1887

    Mason v. Same, Appellant, with disbursements only.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Bray v. Board of Supervisors

    38 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 88 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1883

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. McDonough v. Board of Managers

    36 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 616 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1883

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Thompson v. Board of Supervisors

    16 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 60 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1876

    legal notices and advertisements, required by the laws of this State, or by any special law, to be published in the said county of Hamilton, shall be published in sueh newspaper or newspapers as shall be designated by the board … Section 61 requires the notices in question to be published in the newspapers designated to publish the Session Laws, and requires the boards of supervisors to audit and pay the expenses.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Board of Supervisors v. Hadley

    23 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 113 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1878

    .: The question presented in this case is whether the Board of State Assessors had power to make the decision brought up for *114 review by the certiorari. … , and forward the same by mail within ten days thereafter to the clerk of said board of supervisors, directed to him at his post-office address.”

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Hasbrouck v. Board of Supervisors

    73 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 633 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1892

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.