Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnysupct

10,000+ results

0.72s

  • People ex rel. Gibson v. Board of Assessors

    49 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 655 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1886

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Satterlee v. Board of Police

    19 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 653 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1878

    It was under the authority of this provision that the board acted. … Indeed, the doctrine declared has been enunciated in this court by the case of Drew v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. McMackin v. Board of Police

    53 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 677 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1887

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Humphrey v. Board of Supervisors

    37 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 146 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1883

    Osterhout, and others in this court, this board of supervisors was enjoined from levying or assessing these very claims upon the ground that they were illegal, fraudulent and exorbitant. … Duffy v. West Troy, 25 Hun, 179 ; chap. 554, Laws 1880.) We notice a fact to which the counsel have not referred and that is that both of the judgments are stated in the transcripts to be canceled of record.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Hencken v. Board of Managers

    30 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 667 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1881

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Supervisors v. Sea View Railway Co.

    30 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 180 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1880

    (Pierce v. Dart, 7 Cow., 609 ; Lansing v. Smith, 8 Id., 146.) Ocean Parkway is a public highway, laid out and improved, in pursuance of legislative provision, by the park commissioners of the city of Brooklyn. … Then the board of .supervisors of the county is to make annual provision by tax for the payment of interest on these certificates; and so much of them as shall be chargeable against the parcels of property assessed is to

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Burnham v. Board of Supervisors

    57 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 600 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1888

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Reynolds v. Board of Education

    1 N.Y.S. 743 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 25, 1888

    This is an application in behalf of certain attendance agents of the board of education of the city of Brooklyn, to review the action of that board in refusing to recognize the relators as such attendance agents, and pay … It is the claim of the relators that the proceedings of the board of education on that election were irregular.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Sammis v. Board of Supervisors

    12 N.Y.S. 21 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 10, 1890

    In this case, no such certificate was obtained, but was refused by the commissioners, and there was therefore no power vested in the board of supervisors to appoint commissioners, and the commissioners so appointed had no … If the foregoing views are correct, it follows that the action of the board of supervisors was without authority, and must be reversed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Rubenstein v. Board of Regents of the University

    177 Misc. 253 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 10, 1941

    In Brown v. University of the State of New York (242 App. Div. 85; affd., 266 N. Y. 598 ) this rule was called into question. It was held to be invalid as unauthorized and exceeding statutory authority. … The only legislative action taken in the premises since the Brown case is chapter 406 of the Laws of 1935.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Lewis v. New York State Board of Elections

    178 Misc. 2d 395 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 5, 1998

    Petitioner requests that this court overrule the Board of Elections and allow him to be listed on the ballot as Grandpa Al Lewis. … Rainey v. Crowe, 382 S. W. 2d 38 [Mo.]; State ex rel. Whetsel v. Murphy, 122 Ohio St. 620 ; 26 Am. Jur. 2d, Elections, § 218; 29 C. J. S., Elections, § 161, p. 465).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Fuhry v. Board of Excise

    36 N.Y.S. 158 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 2, 1895

    The application was denied, and the relator instituted this proceeding by a certiorari to review the action of the board which resulted in such denial. … It was not the intention of the legislature to transfer the discretion vested in the boards of excise of this state to the courts or judges.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Smith v. Board of Assessors

    4 N.Y.S. 482 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 25, 1888

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Board of Supervisors v. Fowler

    35 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 440 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1882

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Johnston v. Board of Supervisors

    50 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 385 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1887

    The relator presented a ■verified bill to the board of supervisors for this sum and its allowance was refused.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. White v. Board of Supervisors

    16 N.Y.S. 380 · New York Supreme Court · May 21, 1891

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Morgan v. Board of Supervisors

    67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 585 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1891

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. McGrath v. Board of Excise

    71 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 634 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1892

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Bacon v. Board of Supervisors

    45 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 373 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1885

    .: No doubt can be entertained, I think, but that the general law (chap. 482 of Laws of 1875) gives the board of supervisors of Kings county power to fix the number, grades and compensation of the employes in the office of … Immediately after his election there was by resolution of the board of supervisors a reduction made in the sum which was to be raised for the office for the year beginning January 1, 1878.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Westbrook v. Board of Supervisors

    41 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 599 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1885

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.