Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.72s
People ex rel. Gibson v. Board of Assessors
49 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 655 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1886
Cited 0 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. Satterlee v. Board of Police
19 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 653 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1878
It was under the authority of this provision that the board acted. … Indeed, the doctrine declared has been enunciated in this court by the case of Drew v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. McMackin v. Board of Police
53 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 677 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1887
Cited 0 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. Humphrey v. Board of Supervisors
37 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 146 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1883
Osterhout, and others in this court, this board of supervisors was enjoined from levying or assessing these very claims upon the ground that they were illegal, fraudulent and exorbitant. … Duffy v. West Troy, 25 Hun, 179 ; chap. 554, Laws 1880.) We notice a fact to which the counsel have not referred and that is that both of the judgments are stated in the transcripts to be canceled of record.
Cited 0 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. Hencken v. Board of Managers
30 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 667 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1881
Cited 0 timesPublishedBoard of Supervisors v. Sea View Railway Co.
30 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 180 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1880
(Pierce v. Dart, 7 Cow., 609 ; Lansing v. Smith, 8 Id., 146.) Ocean Parkway is a public highway, laid out and improved, in pursuance of legislative provision, by the park commissioners of the city of Brooklyn. … Then the board of .supervisors of the county is to make annual provision by tax for the payment of interest on these certificates; and so much of them as shall be chargeable against the parcels of property assessed is to
Cited 0 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. Burnham v. Board of Supervisors
57 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 600 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1888
Cited 0 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. Reynolds v. Board of Education
1 N.Y.S. 743 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 25, 1888
This is an application in behalf of certain attendance agents of the board of education of the city of Brooklyn, to review the action of that board in refusing to recognize the relators as such attendance agents, and pay … It is the claim of the relators that the proceedings of the board of education on that election were irregular.
Cited 0 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. Sammis v. Board of Supervisors
12 N.Y.S. 21 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 10, 1890
In this case, no such certificate was obtained, but was refused by the commissioners, and there was therefore no power vested in the board of supervisors to appoint commissioners, and the commissioners so appointed had no … If the foregoing views are correct, it follows that the action of the board of supervisors was without authority, and must be reversed.
Cited 0 timesPublishedRubenstein v. Board of Regents of the University
177 Misc. 253 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 10, 1941
In Brown v. University of the State of New York (242 App. Div. 85; affd., 266 N. Y. 598 ) this rule was called into question. It was held to be invalid as unauthorized and exceeding statutory authority. … The only legislative action taken in the premises since the Brown case is chapter 406 of the Laws of 1935.
Cited 1 timesPublishedLewis v. New York State Board of Elections
178 Misc. 2d 395 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 5, 1998
Petitioner requests that this court overrule the Board of Elections and allow him to be listed on the ballot as Grandpa Al Lewis. … Rainey v. Crowe, 382 S. W. 2d 38 [Mo.]; State ex rel. Whetsel v. Murphy, 122 Ohio St. 620 ; 26 Am. Jur. 2d, Elections, § 218; 29 C. J. S., Elections, § 161, p. 465).
Cited 1 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. Fuhry v. Board of Excise
36 N.Y.S. 158 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 2, 1895
The application was denied, and the relator instituted this proceeding by a certiorari to review the action of the board which resulted in such denial. … It was not the intention of the legislature to transfer the discretion vested in the boards of excise of this state to the courts or judges.
Cited 0 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. Smith v. Board of Assessors
4 N.Y.S. 482 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 25, 1888
Cited 0 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. Board of Supervisors v. Fowler
35 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 440 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1882
Cited 0 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. Johnston v. Board of Supervisors
50 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 385 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1887
The relator presented a ■verified bill to the board of supervisors for this sum and its allowance was refused.
Cited 0 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. White v. Board of Supervisors
16 N.Y.S. 380 · New York Supreme Court · May 21, 1891
Cited 0 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. Morgan v. Board of Supervisors
67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 585 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1891
Cited 0 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. McGrath v. Board of Excise
71 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 634 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1892
Cited 0 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. Bacon v. Board of Supervisors
45 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 373 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1885
.: No doubt can be entertained, I think, but that the general law (chap. 482 of Laws of 1875) gives the board of supervisors of Kings county power to fix the number, grades and compensation of the employes in the office of … Immediately after his election there was by resolution of the board of supervisors a reduction made in the sum which was to be raised for the office for the year beginning January 1, 1878.
Cited 0 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. Westbrook v. Board of Supervisors
41 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 599 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1885
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna