Case law

Sodha v. New York State Board of Law Examiners

105 Misc. 2d 159 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 26, 1980

This court may not substitute its judgment for that of a duly constituted Board of Law Examiners in the evaluation of an applicant’s qualifications to practice a profession (Matter of Erlanger v Regents of Univ. of State … Matter of Levi v Regents of Univ. of State of N. Y., 281 NY 627 ).

Berman v. Commissioners of the Board of Elections

49 Misc. 2d 713 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 25, 1966

Defendants, the Commissioners of the Board of Elections of the City of New York, move, pursuant to CPLR 3211, for dismissal of the complaint for legal insufficiency.

People ex rel. Dinsmore v. Croton Aqueduct Board

16 How. Pr. 4 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1858

The case was heard before Judge Peabody, who confirmed the decision of the Aqueduct Board. … The order does not bind them, and, as against them, does not protect the Croton Board.

Hyzer v. Board of Sup'rs of Ulster County

20 N.Y.S. 912 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 22, 1892

People ex rel. McGrath v. Board of Supervisors

23 N.Y.S. 419 · New York Supreme Court · May 8, 1893

The constitution (article 3, § 18) provides that the legislature shall have no power to pass a private or local bill “providing for the election of the members of the board of supervisors.” … Reed v. Scmit, 39 Hun, 223 . The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

People ex rel. Burhans v. Board of Supervisors

39 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 645 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1884

People ex rel. Eckerson v. Board of Trustees

72 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 620 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1892

People ex rel. Bush v. Board of County

73 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 265 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1892

Co. v. Fairman, 91 N. Y., 387 .) Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and printing.

People ex rel. Reynolds v. Board of Education

1 N.Y.S. 743 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 25, 1888

This is an application in behalf of certain attendance agents of the board of education of the city of Brooklyn, to review the action of that board in refusing to recognize the relators as such attendance agents, and pay … It is the claim of the relators that the proceedings of the board of education on that election were irregular.

People ex rel. Sammis v. Board of Supervisors

12 N.Y.S. 21 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 10, 1890

In this case, no such certificate was obtained, but was refused by the commissioners, and there was therefore no power vested in the board of supervisors to appoint commissioners, and the commissioners so appointed had no … If the foregoing views are correct, it follows that the action of the board of supervisors was without authority, and must be reversed.

People ex rel. Smith v. Board of Commissioners

62 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 611 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1890

People ex rel. Russell v. Board of Supervisors

13 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 304 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1875

People ex rel. Board of Charities v. Davis

22 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 209 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1878

The board was authorized to elect a clerk. (§ 7.) The clerk shall not be a member of the board (§ 7), and he is required to keep a record of the proceedings of the board. (§8.) … (Powell v. Tuttle, 3 Comst., 396.) It is suggested by the respondent’s counsel that the resolution of the board was authorized by section 10 of the act creating the *212 board.

People ex rel. Bancroft v. Board of Supervisors

25 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 19 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1879

By chapter 254 of the Laws of 1859, express authority was conferred upon boards of supervisors, and it was made their duty annually to fix and determine the compensation to be allowed and paid to officers, for the conveyance

People ex rel. Heiser v. Board of Assessors

23 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 407 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1878

People ex rel. Adams v. Board of Aldermen

48 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 641 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1886

People ex rel. Gibson v. Board of Assessors

49 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 655 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1886

People ex rel. Satterlee v. Board of Police

19 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 653 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1878

It was under the authority of this provision that the board acted. … Indeed, the doctrine declared has been enunciated in this court by the case of Drew v.

People ex rel. McMackin v. Board of Police

53 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 677 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1887

People ex rel. Humphrey v. Board of Supervisors

37 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 146 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1883

Osterhout, and others in this court, this board of supervisors was enjoined from levying or assessing these very claims upon the ground that they were illegal, fraudulent and exorbitant. … Duffy v. West Troy, 25 Hun, 179 ; chap. 554, Laws 1880.) We notice a fact to which the counsel have not referred and that is that both of the judgments are stated in the transcripts to be canceled of record.