Case law

People ex rel. Noyes v. Board of Canvassers

14 N.Y.S. 948 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 23, 1891

Myers-Brooks Publishing Co. v. Board of Supervisors

68 Misc. 2d 1033 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 7, 1972

(Matter of Relihan v. Brink, supra, p. 731 .) … (Botens v. Aronauer, 66 Mise 2d 5.)

People ex rel. Strough v. Board of County Canvassers

28 N.Y.S. 871 · New York Supreme Court · May 18, 1894

People v. Smith, 69 N. Y. 175 ; In re Curser, 89 N. Y. 401 ; People v. Crissey, 91 N. Y. 616 ; Mark v. State, 97 N. Y. 572 . … People v. Morrison, 78 N. Y. 84, 89 ; Smith v. People, 47 N. Y. 330, 339 ; Whipple v. Christian, 80 N. Y. 523, 526 ; Van Vranken v. City of Schenectady, 31 Hun, 516 , 518.

Moore v. Board of Regents of the University

89 Misc. 2d 23 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 18, 1977

These and other powers were, in effect, confirmed by the Constitution of 1894 (see Institute of Metropolis v University of State of N. … However, an examination of the record discloses that there is a rational basis to support the determination of the commissioner (see Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222 , 231), whether that determination rested on

Independence Terrace Corp. v. Board of Standards & Appeals

35 Misc. 2d 368 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 16, 1962

In these circumstances, the board’s finding that the land is a park or a public place has substantial evidence to support it. … The board’s motion to vacate the order of certiorari is granted, the petition is dismissed, and the determination of the board affirmed. The cross motion is denied.

Nyack Hospital v. Village of Nyack Planning Board

167 Misc. 2d 490 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 14, 1996

The failure of the Legislature to include such a provision is a strong indication that such exclusion was intended (People v Finnegan, 85 NY2d 53 , citing People v Tychanski, 78 NY2d 909 , and other cases), particularly where … Any alleged noncompliance by defendant with the provisions of Village Law § 7-725-a must be addressed within the context of a special proceeding to compel the Planning Board to act (see, Rice, Practice Commentaries, McKinney

Consolidated Sheet Metal Works, Inc. v. Board of Education

62 Misc. 2d 445 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 28, 1970

The court’s attention was also called to decisions of the Commissioner of Education in Matter of Richards v. Board of Educ. (5 N. Y. Educ. Dept. Rep. 112) and Matter of Kewanee Tech. Furniture Co. v. … (Matter of Carucci v. Dulan, 24 A D 2d 529.) Briefly stated the material facts are: The Board of Education of the City of Watertown, N.

Harlem Bridge, M. & F. Railway Co. v. Town Board

22 N.Y.S. 1105 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 16, 1892

Rosen v. New York City Teachers' Retirement Board

202 Misc. 159 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 3, 1952

of the Constitution (Cashman v. … Board of Educ. of City of N. Y., 300 N.

Centro Building Corp. v. Board of Zoning Appeals

21 Misc. 2d 964 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 18, 1960

This is a proceeding, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, to compel the respondent, the Board of Zoning Appeals of the Incorporated Village of Bast Hills, to hear and determine the application of the petitioner … (Cusack Co. v. City of Chicago, 242 U. S. 526 .)

Mutual Benefit Life Insurance v. Board of Supervisors

20 How. Pr. 416 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1861

Harlem Bridge, Morrisania & F. R. Co. v. Town Board

50 N.Y. St. Rep. 934 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 16, 1892

Claim of Lacy v. Buffalo Board of Education

89 Misc. 2d 255 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 7, 1977

Atkin v. New York City Teachers' Retirement Board

39 Misc. 2d 646 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 18, 1963

It appears from the Tenth Annual Report of the Retirement Board for 1932 that investigation and finding were made. … Section B2CL13.0 of the Administrative Code provides that after investigation and valuation by the board actuary, the board shall ‘4 Adopt for the retirement system such mortality, service and other tables as shall be deemed

People ex rel. Cole v. Board of Supervisors

2 How. Pr. 483 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1884

His bill was presented to the board of supervisors of the county of Greene for audit, and on the rejection of such bill, upon the ground that the same was not a legal charge against the county, the relator asks that a mandamus … Indeed, it was stated upon the argument that in refusing to obey the order the county treasurer acted by direction of the board of supervisors.

People ex rel. Youmans v. Board of Supervisors

9 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 102 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1874

The record of the proceedings of said board is as follows: Resolved, That we as a board of supervisors decline to change or interfere with William Toumans’ assessment as to rents reserved in the towns of Kortright and Davenport … The board of supervisors erred in refusing to interfere with such assessments on the ground that it had no power or discretion in the matter.

People ex rel. Tanner v. Board of Supervisors

32 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 312 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1881

People ex rel. McCarthy v. Board of Police

34 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 467 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1882

People ex rel. Bray v. Board of Supervisors

38 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 88 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1883

People ex rel. Hasbrouck v. Board of Supervisors

73 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 633 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1892