Case law

Brown v. City of New York

District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 1, 2020

ELECTRONICALLY FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT I I a see SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DATE FILED: 11/1/20 _ □ Deborah Brown … See 29 U.S.C. § 216(b); Young v.

Brown v. Barnes and Noble, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 26, 2020

STATES DISTRICT COURT DOCUMENT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: KELLY BROWN … Easley v. Cromartie, 532 U.S. 234, 243 (2001) (quoting United States v. U.S. Gypsum Co., 333 U.S. 364, 395 (1948)) (internal quotation marks omitted).

Wiggin v. The Glamorganshire

50 F. 840 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 16, 1892

Brown, District Judge. The evidence from Shanghai sufficiently establishes that the tea, when shipped, was in sound condition and free from camphor damage. … Clark v. Barnwell, 12 How. 280 ; The Sabioncello, 7 Ben. 357 ; The Carrie Delap, 1 Fed. Rep. 874. But no general usage is established to bring tea and camphor in the same vessel to this country. Minis v. Nelson, 48 Fed.

Seabrook v. Jacobson

970 F. Supp. 252 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 7, 1997

United States v. … See Ballentine v.

Clyde Steamship Co. v. The William Smith

59 F. 615 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 8, 1893

BROWN, District Judge. The whole net proceeds of vessel, cargo and freight amount to $8,336.23. Prom this should be deducted, first, the expenses of bringing the schooner to New York from Southport, N. … She is a large passenger steamer, worth about $225,000, and had on board a cargo worth about $370,000, as well as passengers impatient for the completion of the voyage.

Brown v. National Basketball Association (NBA)

District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 31, 2020

DISTRICT COURT DOCUMENT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: KIMBERLY BERNICE BROWN … See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962).

Brown v. State of New York

District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 17, 2020

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK NOEL BROWN, Petitioner, 20-CV-5280 (CM) -against- … Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). SO ORDERED.

Brown v. State of New York

District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 13, 2020

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK NOEL BROWN, … Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that appellant demonstrates good faith when seeking review of a nonfrivolous issue). SO ORDERED.

Laverty v. The John Cottrell

34 F. 907 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 21, 1888

When the lighter arrived none of the barge’s men were on board, but only a watchman for the night. … Carr. §§ 58, 61: Browne, Carr. §§ 74, 32, note; Summer v. Caswell, 20 Fed.

Brown v. Midland Credit Management, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 31, 2020

Brown’s arguments are without merit. … -Ala. v.

Ackert v. Ausman

198 F. Supp. 538 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 16, 1961

See Hurn v. Oursler, 1933, 289 U.S. 238 , 53 S.Ct. 586 , 77 L.Ed. 1148 ; Brown v. Bullock, D.C.S.D.N.Y.1961, 194 F.Supp. 207 . An action under the Investment Company Act is cognizable in the federal courts. In Brown v. … In Brown v.

Brown v. National Basketball Association (NBA)

District Court, S.D. New York · May 19, 2020

Cf Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). … The case was originally filed Pro Se: Brown vs National Basketball Association, and Tamera Young. Kimberly B. Brown

Midwest Corp. v. Global Cable, Inc.

688 F. Supp. 872 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 9, 1988

V. v. Sinks, 646 F.Supp. 122, 127 (S.D.N.Y.1986). … Brown Aff. at ¶ 9.

Islamic Community Center for Mid Westchester v. City of Yonkers Landmark Preservation Board

258 F. Supp. 3d 405 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 28, 2017

(the “Landmark Preservation Board”); the City of - Yonkers Planning Bureau, also known as the City of Yonkers Planning Board (the “Planning Bureau”); the City of Yonkers; Mayor Michael Spa-no, in his-official capacity as … Conyers v.

Brown v. Barnes and Noble, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York · May 14, 2020

See Gulino v. Board of Educ. of City Sch. Dist. of City of New York, No. 96 CIV. 8414, 2017 WL 1294557, at *10 (S.D.N.Y. … See Pig Newton, Inc. v. Boards of Dirs. of the Motion Picture Indus. Pension Plan, 13 Civ. 7312 (KPF), 2016 WL 796840, *7 (S.D.N.Y.

Brown v. National Basketball Association (NBA)

District Court, S.D. New York · May 12, 2020

Cf Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). … The case was originally filed Pro Se: Brown vs National Basketball Association, and Tamera Young. Kimberly B. Brown

Retirement Board of Policemen's Annuity & Benefit Fund v. Bank of New York Mellon

914 F. Supp. 2d 422 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 3, 2012

Inc. v. … While BNYM observes that corporations typically pay dividends to stockholders on a regular basis as well, the payment of dividends is typically “left to the discretion of the board.” eBay Domestic Holdings, Inc. v.

Arnold v. KPMG LLP

543 F. Supp. 2d 230 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 28, 2008

Id. at 1974 ; see also Iqbal v. … In Foman v.

Silverman Ex Rel. National Labor Relations Board v. Ehrlich Beer Corp.

687 F. Supp. 67 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 21, 1987

Equal Employment Opportunity Comm’n v. Waterfront Comm’n, 665 F.Supp. 197, 200 , Memorandum & Order of April 22, 1987 (S.D.N.Y.). Here no investigation was made. … See the comprehensive discussion of this axiom by Chief Judge Weinstein in Zimmerman v. Schweiker, 575 F.Supp. 1436, 1440-1 (E.D.N.Y.1983).

Brown v. Barnes and Noble, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 5, 2020

(ECF No. 276 p. 20) (citing Wang v. Hearst Corp., 2012 WL 6621717 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 19, 2012), and Scott v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc., 67 F. … Herman v. RSR Sec. Servs., 172 F.3d 132, 142 (2d Cir. 1999).