Opinion

Brown v. State of New York

Court
District Court, S.D. New York
Filed
Jul 13, 2020
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 27.1%

holding that appellant demonstrates good faith when seeking review of a nonfrivolous issue

How later courts described this case

  • holding that appellant demonstrates good faith when seeking review of a nonfrivolous issue

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

NOEL BROWN,

Petitioner,

20-CV-5280 (CM)

-against-

ORDER DIRECTING PAYMENT OF FEE

OR IFP APPLICATION

STATE OF NEW YORK,

Respondent.

COLLEEN McMAHON, Chief United States District Judge:

Petitioner, proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of habeas corpus. To proceed

with a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in this Court, a petitioner must either pay the $5.00

filing fee or, to request authorization to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP), that is, without

prepayment of fees, submit a signed IFP application. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914, 1915.

Petitioner submitted the petition without the filing fee or an IFP application. Within thirty

days of the date of this order, Petitioner must either pay the $5.00 filing fee or complete and

submit the attached IFP application. If Petitioner submits the IFP application, it should be labeled

with docket number 20-CV-5280 (CM). If the Court grants the IFP application, Petitioner will be

permitted to proceed without prepayment of fees. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1).

The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Petitioner and note service

on the docket. No answer shall be required at this time. If Petitioner complies with this order, the

case shall be processed in accordance with the procedures of the Clerk’s Office. If Petitioner fails

to comply with this order within the time allowed, the action will be dismissed.

The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would

not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an

appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that appellant

demonstrates good faith when seeking review of a nonfrivolous issue).

SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 13, 2020 ,

New York, New York bie. l Wyk

COLLEEN McMAHON

Chief United States District Judge

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.