Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnysd

10,000+ results

5.14s

  • Michelsen v. Penney

    41 F. Supp. 603 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 6, 1941

    The opinion of February 5 clearly states defendant’s responsibility under both of these sources of liability. … But in the meantime they were fully qualified directors.”

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Oklahoma Firefighters Pension & Retirement System v. Student Loan Corp.

    951 F. Supp. 2d 479 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 25, 2013

    Students were required to meet strict Department of Education underwriting criteria to qualify to receive FFEL loans, including attendance at an eligible educational institution and minimum creditworthiness. (Id. ¶ 29.) … As an initial matter, they simply have not established defendants’ failure to disclose any information.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Klein v. A.G. Becker Paribas Inc.

    109 F.R.D. 646 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 19, 1986

    Joinder of such persons is clearly impracticable. See Somerville v. Major Exploration, Inc., [1984] Fed.Sec.L.Rep. ¶ 91,473 at 98,369, 102 F.R.D. 500 (S.D.N.Y.1984); Brady v. … Davella’s counsel has an outstanding reputation in the securities field, and is clearly capable of handling this litigation. Cf. Kronfeld v.

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • Alarmex Holdings, LLC v. Gowan

    527 B.R. 126 · District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 6, 2014

    As to the first method: The record below does not conclusively establish whether the funds at issue were, or were not, held for Alarmex in a segregated sub-account. … But the bankruptcy court did not clearly make any such finding.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Medinol Ltd. v. Guidant Corp.

    417 F. Supp. 2d 280 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 15, 2006

    that “substantially rigid after expansion” refers to the ability of the stent to hold open the blood vessel in which it is deployed, and Guidant does not dispute that the accused products qualify as “substantially rigid … The entire connector of the accused products qualifies as a flexible link, not just the looped portion.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Franklin Resources, Inc. v. Franklin Credit Management Corp.

    988 F. Supp. 322 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 16, 1997

    At present over 5 million investment accounts have been established in one or another of the Franklin funds. … In the case at bar, Franklin Resources argues that its trademark has been diluted by tarnishment, reciting in its proposed Conclusions of Law at ¶ 37: “Clearly the defendants’ method of conducting business by aggressively

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Rodriguez v. Debuono

    177 F.R.D. 143 · District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 25, 1997

    Personal Care Services in New York State Medicaid, established under Title XIX of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1396 et seq. … Next, Plaintiffs must establish that the case falls within one of Rule 23(b)’s categories for which a class action is appropriate.

    Vacated by Rodriguez v. Debuono, 162 F.3d 56 (1998)Cited 8 timesPublished
  • In Re Hyde

    235 B.R. 539 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 25, 1999

    Accordingly, this Court will review the Bankruptcy Court’s conclusions of law de novo and its factual findings under the “clearly erroneous” standard. In re Maxwell Newspapers, Inc., 981 F.2d 85, 89 (2d Cir.1992). … These concessions could establish that the documents are authentic and likely admissible against him. See Fed. R.Evid. 901.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Kreiss v. McCown De Leeuw & Co.

    131 F. Supp. 2d 428 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 19, 2001

    OSI introduced evidence concerning the book value of the options in the form of a detailed analysis by Daniel Pijut, the Corporate Controller and Vice President of OSI and a qualified CPA. … clearly contemplated by the agreement.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Negron v. Ward

    458 F. Supp. 748 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 16, 1978

    , 25 and because a state-created right to treatment was clearly established prior to the acts complained of, see Kessenbrenner, supra; Dunleavy, supra; Negron, supra, the Court joins in plaintiffs’ assertion that “[i]n view … For this reason, too, Ternullo did not establish the good faith immunity defense. For the foregoing reasons, Ternullo’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial is denied. It is so ordered. 1 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Klein v. Vision Lab Telecommunications, Inc.

    399 F. Supp. 2d 528 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 18, 2005

    However, plaintiffs themselves qualify this statement: “Senator Hollings only mentioned his hope that states would allow such actions to be brought in small claims court because he wished that consumers who had a limited … establishes that there is a substantial ground for difference of opinion on the issue.

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • Eichie v. Kuakazi

    District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 1, 2023

    Sovereign Immunity and Judicial Review Under the SSA Since the defendant in this case is the Commissioner of Social Security, sovereign immunity and this Court’s subject matter jurisdiction are implicated at … Plaintiff has not established a clear right either to a change in the distribution of back payments or to an alteration of Plaintiff’s paperwork.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • United States v. Weissman

    22 F. Supp. 2d 187 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 24, 1998

    Weissman’s testimony about Ken-ney’s declaration was clearly material—nay, central—to the issues at the hearing. … The elements of the administration-of-justice enhancement are thus established.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. v. LTV Corp. (In Re Chateaugay Corp.)

    87 B.R. 779 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 22, 1988

    Therefore, the continued accrual of employee pension benefits results from maintaining a qualified pension plan under ERISA. … ‘[a]bsent a clearly expressed legislative intention to the contrary, [statutory] language must ordinarily be regarded as conclusive.’ ” Escondido Mutual Water Co. v.

    Reversed on other grounds by Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. LTV Corp., 496 U.S. 633 (1990)Cited 39 timesPublished
  • Sanderson v. Roethenmund

    682 F. Supp. 205 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 22, 1988

    The Court of Appeals has stated that “[b]efore changes in the rights of a security holder can qualify as the purchase of a new security ... there must be such significant change in the nature of the investment or in the investment … The underlying certificates of deposit were issued by regulated and insured domestic banks and were clearly not securities under Marine Bank .

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. United States Department of Health and Human Services

    District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 30, 2020

    FCC, 109 F.3d 418, 426 (8th Cir. 1996) (“The threat of unrecoverable economic loss . . . does qualify as irreparable harm.”). … O’Neal is qualified to offer this assessment, based on his position and experience. (Pl.’s Reply 14–15; O’Neal Decl. ¶¶ 2–5.)

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Salma v. NASA Department Headquarter

    District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 31, 2020

    The Court must dismiss an in forma pauperis complaint, or portion thereof, that is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune … Its [sic] clearly consider[ed] like a theory. [ ] About Airway: Ozone theory existence. (Id. at 7.)

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Sutton Hill Associates v. Landes

    705 F. Supp. 940 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 30, 1989

    Neither is a contract automatically immune from the requirements of the statute of frauds, however, because it is "joint venture" agreement. … This provision clearly implies that the landlord would be able to operate the Theatres during that twelve month period. 11 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Gonzalez v. Clark

    District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 16, 2019

    Court must dismiss an in forma pauperis complaint, or any portion of the complaint, that is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune … 1 The Court “may take judicial notice of a document filed in another court . . . to establish the fact of such litigation.”

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Community Bank of Sullivan County v. First National Bank of Jeffersonville

    125 F. Supp. 2d 659 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 12, 2000

    This record clearly reflects that the OCC concluded that because the area in question was heavily wooded and sparsely populated, it lacked the type of cohesive community generally understood under New York law to be necessary … As previously noted, the OCC engaged in the required fact-based analysis and concluded that the area could be best described as urban sprawl, which, under the reasoning in Putnam, 384 N.Y.S.2d at 673 , does not qualify as

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.