Case law

United States ex rel. Hom Ling Wun v. Reimer

31 F. Supp. 819 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 6, 1940

See United States ex rel Fong Lung Sing v. Day [2 Cir.], 37 F.(2d) 36 , and cases there cited. … Fong Lung Sing v.

Lucien Lelong v. George W. Button Corporation

50 F. Supp. 708 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 26, 1943

In Brown v. Doscher, 147 N.Y. 647 , 42 N.E. 268 , the court said the law did not entitle a party to appropriate a form of package and gave Enoch Morgan’s Sons Co. v. … The form was not an issue in the Brown v. Doscher case in the lower court, 73 Hun 107 , 26 N.Y.S. 951 , and had not been found a mark of plaintiff’s goods.

In re Herrman

102 F. 753 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 8, 1900

BROWN, District Judge. … Proceedings in bankruptcy are doubtless in the nature of a suit (Sandusky v. Bank, 23 Wall. 289 , 23 L. Ed. 155 ; In re Adams, 36 How. Prac. 270, 271 , Fed. Cas. No. 40; In re Comstock, 3 Sawy. 128 , Fed. Cas.

Filion v. United States

375 F. Supp. 721 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 7, 1974

On May 10, 1973, the Board of Parole denied petitioner parole and it is this order, as well as its subsequent affirmance, which petitioner attacks. … Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of Kentucky, 410 U.S. 484 , 93 S.Ct. 1123 , 35 L.Ed.2d 443 (1973). Petitioner is not attacking the sentence imposed by this court.

Gold Bond Stamp Co. v. Bradfute Corp.

303 F. Supp. 532 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 30, 1969

Cobb v. Daughtry, 188 Ga. 70 , 2 S.E.2d 638 (S.Ct. 1939). … As stated in Wolk v. Benefit Ass’n of Ry.

Laufer v. Olla Industries, Inc.

96 F.R.D. 230 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 29, 1982

Plaintiff was incorrect in excusing demand by assuming that a demand would have been futile merely because a majority of the Board of Directors had been named as individual defendants in the case. See Markowitz v. … See Brooks v. American Export Indus., 68 F.R.D. 506 (S.D.N.Y.1975).

Hayes v. County of Sullivan

853 F. Supp. 2d 400 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 30, 2012

See also Brown v. Choinski, No. 09-CV-1631, 2011 WL 1106232 , at *1 (D.Conn. … Comm’rs v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997); see also Newton v.

Clune v. PUBLISHERS'ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK CITY

214 F. Supp. 520 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 6, 1963

Rather, the compelling conclusion is that Congress intended ‘that the Board should continue its established administrative practice of certifying multi-employer units, and intended to leave to the Board’s specialized judgment … Beverage Co. v. N. L. R. B., 7 Cir., 1951, 190 F.2d 576, 582 , Lindley, Circuit Judge, wrote: “ * * * Old Rose, of course, had a clear right to replace its striking employees. National Labor Relations Board v.

Howard v. Cronk

85 F.R.D. 737 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 20, 1980

Duchesne v. Sugarman, 566 F.2d 817, 830 (2d Cir. 1977). See also Rizzo v. Goode, 423 U.S. 362, 370-71 , 96 S.Ct. 598, 603-04 , 46 L.Ed.2d 561 (1976); Smith v. … See Browning Debenture Holder’s Com’tee v. DASA, 560 F.2d 1078, 1086 (2d Cir. 1977); Bricker v. Crane, 468 F.2d 1228, 1233 (1st Cir. 1972). So ordered.

Securities Industries Ass'n v. Clarke

703 F. Supp. 256 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 19, 1988

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 468 U.S. 207, 217 , 104 S.Ct. 3003, 3009 , 82 L.Ed.2d 158 (1983) (“SIA II”) and Federal Election Commission v. … Securities Industry Association v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 847 F.2d 890, 891 (D.C.Cir.1988).

Stanley Rubenstein v. Linda L. Adamany

District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 28, 2022

For example, in Grace v. … (quoting Browning Debenture Holders’ Comm. v. DASA Corp., 524 F.2d 811, 817 (2d Cir. 1975)). The Second Circuit has cautioned against finding loss causation where the terms of the directors at issue have expired.

Property Advisory Group, Inc. v. Bevona

718 F. Supp. 209 · District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 7, 1989

(“Cooper Hill”) lacked authority to execute an agreement binding plaintiffs to collective bargaining agreements negotiated between defendants Realty Advisory Board (“RAB”) and Local 32B-32J (“the Union”). … Accord Columbia Broadcast Systems Inc. v.

TNS Media Research, LLC v. TRA Global, Inc.

984 F. Supp. 2d 205 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 25, 2013

V to Rutt Reply Deck, at TRAE0023309). . … Island Software and Computer Serv., Inc. v.

Hall v. Lefkowitz

305 F. Supp. 1030 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 4, 1969

Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp. v. Epstein, 370 U.S. 713, 715 , 82 S.Ct. 1294, 1296 , 8 L.Ed.2d 794 (1962). 2 . Cf. Flast v. Gardner, 267 F.Supp. 351 (S.D.N.Y.1967). 3 . Flast v. … See People v. Belous, 80 Cal.Rptr. 354 , 458 P.2d 194 (Sup.Ct.1969). 6 . Jackson v. Choate, 404 F.2d 910, 913 (5th Cir. 1968).

Ball v. Baker

District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 16, 2021

strategy” at “Board meetings.” … Encyclopedia Brown Prods., Ltd. v. Home Box Office, Inc., 26 F. Supp. 2d 606, 614 (S.D.N.Y. 1998) (sealing defendants’ confidential business information).

SEC v. Heden

51 F. Supp. 2d 296 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 28, 1999

See U.S. v. … See Jackson Dairy, Inc. v. H.P.

United States Ex Rel. Szlajmer v. Esperdy

188 F. Supp. 491 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 26, 1960

Leng May Ma v. Barber, 1958, 357 U.S. 185 , 78 S.Ct. 1072 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1246 ; Rogers v. Quan, 1958, 357 U.S. 193 , 78 S.Ct. 1076 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1252 . … Tsevdos v. Reimer, 2 Cir., 1940, 108 F.2d 860 . Cf., Sleddens v.

United States v. Amtraco Commodity Corp.

389 F. Supp. 1084 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 30, 1974

Johnson Contracting Corp. v. United States, 132 F.Supp. 698 , 132 Ct.Cl. 645 (1955); Rust Engineering Co. v. United States, 86 Ct.Cl. 461 (1938). … See Davis v. United States, 180 Ct.Cl. 20 (1967).

Securities & Exchange Commission v. Micro-Moisture Controls, Inc.

21 F.R.D. 164 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 31, 1957

See, also, Walsh v. Connecticut Mutual Life Ins. Co., D.C., 26 F.Supp. 566 ; McCrate v. Morgan Packing Co., D.C., 26 F.Supp. 812 . … As to defendants Brown, Barton & Engel, Incorporated, and George Phillip Barton Items 2, 5, 8 and 9. As to defendant Rudolph v. Klein Items 1 and 2. As to defendants Culpepper and Rockwell Securities Corporation Item 1.

La Fontaine v. The G. M. McAllister

101 F. Supp. 826 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 17, 1951

However, evidence was introduced only with respect to loss of wages, but none as to the value of room and board, and there is no indication that wages included these items. … Jordine v. Walling, 3 Cir., 1950, 185 F.2d 662 . But Jansson v.