Case law

United States ex rel. Chin Ming Mow v. Shaughnessy

118 F. Supp. 490 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 31, 1953

Soo Hoo Chew Yee v. Shaughnessy, D.C.S.D.N.Y. 1952, 104 F.Supp. 425 ; U. S. ex rel. Chu Leung v. Shaughnessy, D.C.S.D. N.Y.1952, 88 F.Supp. 91 ; Shaughnessy v. U. S. ex rel. … The cases upon which the defendants rely, Lee Hung v. Acheson, Lee Siu v. Acheson and Lee Jam v. Acheson, D.C.D.Nev. 1952, 103 F.Supp. 35 , are distinguishable.

Rufino v. United States

126 F. Supp. 132 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 1, 1954

Defendant further claims that plaintiff has an exclusive remedy under 38 U.S.G.A. § 501a. 14 Brown v. United States 15 decided in the Circuit Court of this circuit is direct authority to the contrary. … See also Brown v. U. S., 2 Cir., 1954, 209 F.2d 463 , wherein the Circuit Court for this circuit refrained from passing on this question. 10 .

Kreinberg v. Dow Chemical Co.

496 F. Supp. 2d 329 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 23, 2007

See Ayala-Branch v. Tad Telecom, Inc., 197 F.Supp.2d 13, 15 (S.D.N.Y.2002); Berman v. Informix Corporation, 30 F.Supp.2d 653, 657 (S.D.N.Y.1998) (citations omitted). … Liv-eris is the Chief Executive Officer, President, and Chairman of the Board of Dow. Kreinberg resides in Michigan and Florida.

O'CONNOR v. United States

76 F. Supp. 962 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 5, 1948

The occasion for filing the claim was the reversal by the Supreme Court on March 3, 1941, of the case of Saks et al. v. Higgins, supra (see Maass v. … Reliance is had upon Bull v. United States, 295 U.S. 247 , 55 S.Ct. 695 , 79 L.Ed. 1421 ; Lewis v. Reynolds, 284 U.S. 281 , 52 S.Ct. 145 , 79 L.Ed. 293 ; and Tait v. Safe Deposit & Trust Co., 4 Cir., 70 F.2d 79 .

Sprint Spectrum L.P. v. Mills

65 F. Supp. 2d 148 · District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 27, 1999

Zoning Hearing Board of Pine Grove Township, 20 F.Supp.2d 875, 879 (E.D.Pa.1998) (no substantial evidence existed in support of Board’s denial of special exception for erection of telecommunications tower where Board misapplied … Zoning Hearing Board of Pine Grove Township, 20 F.Supp.2d 875 (E.D.Pa.1998); Smart SMR of New York, Inc. v. Zoning Comm’n of the Town of Stratford, 995 F.Supp. 52 (D.Conn.1998).

Securities & Exchange Commission v. Provident Securities, Inc.

452 F. Supp. 477 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 12, 1978

C. v. Packer, Wilbur & Co., Inc. (2d Cir. 1974) 498 F.2d 978 is here controlling. … Freeman v. Marine Midland Bank-New York, 494 F.2d 1334 (2d Cir. 1974), Bell v. J. D. Winer & Co., 392 F.Supp. 646 (S.D.N.Y. *480 1975).

New York Youth Club v. Town of Harrison

150 F. Supp. 3d 264 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 10, 2015

Ward v. … Frontier v.

New Action Coalition v. Local 2 of the United Federation of Teachers

510 F. Supp. 1208 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 16, 1981

Article V, Section 7 of the UFT Constitution provides that “[t]he Executive Board shall supervise all elections in the manner provided for by the Constitution and shall decide all disputes arising out of such elections.” … In Calhoon v.

Albra

District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 13, 2026

Brown v. Eli Lilly & Co., 654 F.3d 347, 358 (2d Cir. 2011). … V.

Richman v. Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.

274 F.R.D. 473 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 25, 2011

See Iron Workers Local No. 25 Pension Fund v. Credit-Based Asset Servicing and Securitization, LLC, 616 F.Supp.2d 461 (S.D.N.Y.2009). … Sofran v. LaBranche & Co. Inc., 220 F.R.D. 398, 404 (S.D.N.Y.2004). CONCLUSION I.

Management Assistance Inc. v. Edelman

584 F. Supp. 1021 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 21, 1984

Edelman met with the Board of Directors of the Company at its invitation. During the meeting, Mr. … See United States v.

Finn v. Empire Trust Co.

121 F. Supp. 309 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 15, 1950

of Childs were to be amended to provide for an executive committee of the board of directors which, subject to the direction of the board, should have and exercise all of the powers of the board. … Dumbadze v. Lignonte, 244 N.Y. 1, 8-9 , 154 N.E. 645 ; Ectore Realty Co v. Manufacturers Trust Co., 250 App. Div. 314 , 294 N.Y.S. 96 ; Sheehan v.

United States v. Walker

805 F. Supp. 1112 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 10, 1992

brown attache case, and that she would drive to a particular motel. … The Court in White quoted its prior opinion in United States v.

Telenor Mobile Communications AS v. STORM LLC

587 F. Supp. 2d 594 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 19, 2008

See SEC v. … ’s board no longer existed.

Wallace v. Munford

29 F. Cas. 81 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 18, 1855

Pitman v. Hooper [Case No. 11,186]. … Freight therefore .was carried by the services of the seamen on board the Palestine.

Ramos-Boyce v. Fordham University

419 F. Supp. 2d 469 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 16, 2005

See Mitchell v. Washingtonville Cent. Sch. Dict., 190 F.3d 1, 7 (2d Cir.1999). But the Cleveland standard does not mean that plaintiffs statements to the Workers’ Compensation Board are of no relevance. … Doria v.

Newman v. Pershing & Co., Inc.

412 F. Supp. 463 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 4, 1975

Section 7(a) of the Exchange Act grants the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve Board authority to establish regulations with respect to the amount of credit that may be initially extended and subsequently maintained … Bell v. Winer & Co., Inc., supra at 15, 17-18. 8 .

Giacalone v. Wehner

387 F. Supp. 2d 383 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 21, 2005

Beatie v. City of New York, 123 F.3d 707, 712 (2d Cir.1997) (citing United States R.R. Retirement Bd. v. Fritz, 449 U.S. 166, 179 , 101 S.Ct. 453 , 66 L.Ed.2d 368 (1980)). … Heller v. Doe, 509 U.S. 312, 320 , 113 S.Ct. 2637 , 125 L.Ed.2d 257 (1993).

Strykers Bay Neighborhood Council, Inc. v. City of New York

695 F. Supp. 1531 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 13, 1988

See Kline v. Wolf, 88 F.R.D. 696, 700 (S.D. N.Y.1981); Greene v. Brown, 451 F.Supp. 1266, 1275 (E.D.Va.1978); Norman v. Arcs Equities Corp., 72 F.R.D. 502, 506 (S.D.N. Y.1976). … Perry v. Sindermann, 408 U.S. 593, 601-02 , 92 S.Ct. 2694, 2699-700 , 33 L.Ed.2d 570 (1972); Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2709 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972); Goetz v.

Birmingham v. SOGEN-SWISS INTERN. CORP., ETC.

529 F. Supp. 86 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 21, 1981

Given that the acknowledged purpose of this section is the protection of employees, see McClintock-Trunkey Co. v. C.I.R., 217 F.2d 329 (9th Cir. 1954); U. S. v. … Central States Southeast v. Hitchings Trucking, 492 F.Supp. 906, 909 (E.D.Mich.1980); cf. Fase v.