Case law

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Local 638 ... Local 28 of the Sheet Metal Workers' International Ass'n

889 F. Supp. 642 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 6, 1995

Aspira of N.Y., Inc. v. Board of Educ. of N.Y., 423 F.Supp. 647, 654 (S.D.N.Y.1976) (Frankel, J.). … (Letter from Casey to Brown of 1/16/92.) Brown claims he was never informed of the reinitiation policy.

In Re Cohen

370 F. Supp. 1166 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 3, 1973

Brown.” The Court reacted: “Please, now. Wait a minute. Please don’t do that.” … Dave Brown and John, last name unknown, an ammunition salesman. Mr. Brown asked John if John could get 200 pounds of unregistered black powder for a good cause. John stated he would have to look around. Mr.

Crespo v. Barnhart

293 F. Supp. 2d 321 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 22, 2003

Consolidated Edison Co. v. NLRB, 305 U.S. 197, 229 , 59 S.Ct. 206 , 83 L.Ed. 126 (1938). The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Brown v. … Schaal v. Apfel, 134 F.3d at 503 . 7 .

Albradco, Inc. v. Bevona

788 F. Supp. 786 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 3, 1992

Franchise Tax Board v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust, 463 U.S. 1, 9 , 103 S.Ct. 2841, 2846 , 77 L.Ed.2d 420 (1983); see also American Well Works Co. v. … Cable Television Association v. Finneran, 954 F.2d 91, 94 (2d Cir.1992) (citations omitted); accord Franchise Tax Board, supra, 463 U.S. at 9-10, 103 S.Ct. at 2846; Louisville & Nashville R. Co. v.

Sotelo-Aquije v. Slattery

863 F. Supp. 133 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 8, 1994

In Pierce v. … Zamora v. INS, 534 F.2d 1055, 1062 (2d Cir.1976).

Reeber v. Rossell

91 F. Supp. 108 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 27, 1950

Reeber’s appeal is now pending before that Board, and Gilbert’s appeal is before the Second Re-, gion Board. … Farrell v. Moomau, supra; Wettre v. Hague, supra ; contra: Breiner v. Wallin, D.C.E.D. Pa.1948, 79 F.Supp. 506 .

United States v. Imperial Oil, Ltd.

287 F. 400 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 29, 1922

St. § 8146e), which provides: “Sec. 9, * * * Every vessel purchased, chartered,” or leased from the board sháll, unless otherwise authorized by the board, be operated only under such registry or enrollment and license. … S. v. Thompson, 42 Sup. Ct. 159, 66 L. Ed. 299 , 257 U. S. 419 , and the observa^ tion of Mr.

Ostrowski v. LOCAL 1-2, UTILITY WORKERS UNION, ETC.

530 F. Supp. 208 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 17, 1980

Keeffe Bros. v. Teamsters Local Union No. 592, supra, 562 F.2d at 303 (citing Semancik v. United Mine Workers of America, supra, 466 F.2d at 150-51 ); see Giordani v. … Caulfield v. Board of Education of the City of New York, 583 F.2d 605, 610 (2d Cir. 1978) [emphasis in original].

Arthur v. Associated Musicians Greater New York, Local 802

278 F. Supp. 400 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 30, 1967

Plaintiffs’ argument rests on the recent decision of the National Labor Relations Board (N.L.R.B.) in American Federation of Musicians v. Glasser, et al., 165 N.L.R.B. 110 . … Vars v. International Brotherhood of Boilermakers, etc., 320 F.2d 576 (2d Cir. 1963). Here, no such determination has been made by the Labor Board.

Egghead.Com, Inc. v. Brookhaven Capital Management, Co.

194 F. Supp. 2d 232 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 29, 2002

School Board of City of Richmond, 416 U.S. 696, 711 , 94 S.Ct. 2006 , 40 L.Ed.2d 476 (1974) andBowen v. Georgetown Univ. Hosp., 488 U.S. 204, 208 , 109 S.Ct. 468 , 102 L.Ed.2d 493 (1988). … Indus., Inc. v. Great Atl. & Pac.

Glasgow Steam Shipping Co. v. Tweedie Trading Co.

154 F. 84 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 4, 1907

Price for Coal on Board When Delivered. The question of the amount which is recoverable for the coal on board depends upon the market price which prevailed in New York at the time of delivery there in December, 1903. … Co. v. Tweedie Trading Co. (D. C.) 146 Fed. 563, 566 . Hire of Gear in Brazil. This is claimed under the provision: “22.

Glendora v. Marshall

947 F. Supp. 707 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 12, 1996

Conner —Glendora v. Malone, 917 F.Supp. 224 (S.D.N.Y.1996); Glendora v. … . #27) by Marshall, Brown, Sullivan, Wicker and Rich, which also seeks dismissal of the amended complaint for failure to state a claim or in the alternative summary judgment.

Strauss v. Microsoft Corp.

856 F. Supp. 821 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 6, 1994

In Saulpaugh v. … See Strauss v. Microsoft Corp., 814 F.Supp. at 1193-94 ; see also Wilder v.

Benjamin v. Sielaff

752 F. Supp. 140 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 30, 1990

Benjamin v. Koehler, 710 F.Supp. 91, 93 (S.D.N.Y.1989). … Flakes v.

Gibbons v. Fronton

533 F. Supp. 2d 449 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 7, 2008

Coulthurst v. United States, 214 F.3d 106, 109 (2d Cir.2000) (quoting United States v. Gaubert, 499 U.S. 315, 322, 323 , 111 S.Ct. 1267 , 113 L.Ed.2d 335 (1991), and Berkovitz v. … The Federal Home Loan Bank Board (“FHLBB”), a federal regulatory agency, was concerned that the shareholder, who was also the chairman of the board, had a conflict of interest with regard to a proposed merger.

Weizmann Institute of Science v. Neschis

421 F. Supp. 2d 654 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 14, 2005

Gelman instructed the Board to make several (sets of) changes to Anturia’s by-laws. … Brown Bros. Harriman & Co., No. 02 Civ. 1230, 2004 WL 1124660 , at *6 n. 4 (S.D.N.Y. May 20, 2004) (denying motion to dismiss because "the Court has already upheld these claims in [its] prior opinion[]”). 32 .

Weil v. McClough

618 F. Supp. 1294 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 1, 1985

A hearing on the citation was scheduled before the New York City Environmental Control Board (the “Board”). … , and an order prohibiting the Board from proceeding further with the matter.

Smith v. Robert R. Sizer & Co.

134 F. 928 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 31, 1905

The rules have been the subject of consideration by this court in Bowen v. Sizer, 93 Fed. 227 , and in Randolph v. Wiley, 118 Fed. 77 . … As was said in Bowen v. Sizer: “The rules of the maritime association do not state in what way ‘feet of lumber’ are to be measured or how ‘board measure’ under Rule 7 is to be computed.”

Fairstein v. Netflix, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York · May 21, 2024

Brown v. Maxwell, 929 F.3d 41, 50 (2d Cir. 2019). … See Mirlis, 952 F.3d at 59; Brown, 929 F.3d at 50.

WINN EX REL. SCOTTISH RE GROUP, LTD. v. Schafer

499 F. Supp. 2d 390 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 7, 2007

499 F.Supp.2d 390 (2007) James WINN, Derivatively on behalf of SCOTTISH RE GROUP LTD, Plaintiff, v. Glenn S. SCHAFER, Michael Austin, William Caufield-Brown, Robert M. Chmely, Jean-Claude Damerval, Michael C. … Plaintiff alleges that the Individual Defendants "receive substantial salaries, bonus payments, benefits, and other emoluments by virtue of their membership on the Board and their control of Scottish Re.