Case law

Jones v. CITY SCHOOL DIST. OF NEW ROCHELLE

695 F. Supp. 2d 136 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 19, 2010

See Brown v. Coach Stores, Inc., 163 F.3d 706, 709 (2d Cir.1998). … Welcome Ctr. v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147, 149 , 104 S.Ct. 1723 , 80 L.Ed.2d 196 (1984).

Glasgow Steam Shipping Co. v. Tweedie Trading Co.

154 F. 84 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 4, 1907

Price for Coal on Board When Delivered. The question of the amount which is recoverable for the coal on board depends upon the market price which prevailed in New York at the time of delivery there in December, 1903. … Co. v. Tweedie Trading Co. (D. C.) 146 Fed. 563, 566 . Hire of Gear in Brazil. This is claimed under the provision: “22.

Strauss v. Microsoft Corp.

856 F. Supp. 821 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 6, 1994

In Saulpaugh v. … See Strauss v. Microsoft Corp., 814 F.Supp. at 1193-94 ; see also Wilder v.

Gulino

District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 12, 2025

First, Calliste points to Canales v. … Second, Brown v. Parkchester South Condos., 287 F.3d 58 (2d Cir. 2002) is equally distinguishable.

Loper v. New York City Police Department

766 F. Supp. 1280 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 17, 1991

Brown (“Brown”). The City has cross moved for summary judgment to dismiss the complaint. For the reasons set forth below, both motions are denied. … Corp. v.

Sprint Spectrum L.P. v. Mills

124 F. Supp. 2d 211 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 20, 2000

See also Broyde v. … Connolly v.

Gibbons v. Fronton

533 F. Supp. 2d 449 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 7, 2008

Coulthurst v. United States, 214 F.3d 106, 109 (2d Cir.2000) (quoting United States v. Gaubert, 499 U.S. 315, 322, 323 , 111 S.Ct. 1267 , 113 L.Ed.2d 335 (1991), and Berkovitz v. … The Federal Home Loan Bank Board (“FHLBB”), a federal regulatory agency, was concerned that the shareholder, who was also the chairman of the board, had a conflict of interest with regard to a proposed merger.

Ram v. Blum

564 F. Supp. 634 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 17, 1983

RAM v. … The Court’s conclusion is bolstered by the fact that the Secretary’s reading is inconsistent with longstanding construction by HHS, HEW and the Social Security Board of the regulatory language at issue. See Shea v.

Weizmann Institute of Science v. Neschis

421 F. Supp. 2d 654 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 14, 2005

Gelman instructed the Board to make several (sets of) changes to Anturia’s by-laws. … Brown Bros. Harriman & Co., No. 02 Civ. 1230, 2004 WL 1124660 , at *6 n. 4 (S.D.N.Y. May 20, 2004) (denying motion to dismiss because "the Court has already upheld these claims in [its] prior opinion[]”). 32 .

Weil v. McClough

618 F. Supp. 1294 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 1, 1985

A hearing on the citation was scheduled before the New York City Environmental Control Board (the “Board”). … , and an order prohibiting the Board from proceeding further with the matter.

Smith v. Robert R. Sizer & Co.

134 F. 928 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 31, 1905

The rules have been the subject of consideration by this court in Bowen v. Sizer, 93 Fed. 227 , and in Randolph v. Wiley, 118 Fed. 77 . … As was said in Bowen v. Sizer: “The rules of the maritime association do not state in what way ‘feet of lumber’ are to be measured or how ‘board measure’ under Rule 7 is to be computed.”

Fairstein v. Netflix, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York · May 21, 2024

Brown v. Maxwell, 929 F.3d 41, 50 (2d Cir. 2019). … See Mirlis, 952 F.3d at 59; Brown, 929 F.3d at 50.

The Vincenzo T.

28 F. Cas. 1199 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 15, 1879

The Columbo [Case No. 3,010]; Clark v. Barnwell, 12 How. [53 U. S.] 272. It appeared that the case was brought by a lighter from Carrara to Leghorn, and there shipped on board the bark. … Whether the marble was broken before it was put on board, or by the- rolling and pitching of the ship on the voyage, is not proven.

WINN EX REL. SCOTTISH RE GROUP, LTD. v. Schafer

499 F. Supp. 2d 390 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 7, 2007

499 F.Supp.2d 390 (2007) James WINN, Derivatively on behalf of SCOTTISH RE GROUP LTD, Plaintiff, v. Glenn S. SCHAFER, Michael Austin, William Caufield-Brown, Robert M. Chmely, Jean-Claude Damerval, Michael C. … Plaintiff alleges that the Individual Defendants "receive substantial salaries, bonus payments, benefits, and other emoluments by virtue of their membership on the Board and their control of Scottish Re.

Federal Trade Commission v. Green

252 F. Supp. 153 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 4, 1966

See Montship Lines, Ltd. v. Federal Maritime Board, 111 U.S.App.D.C. 160 , 295 F.2d 147 (1961); Hellenic Lines, Ltd. v. Federal Maritime Board, 111 U.S.App.D.C. 151 , 295 F.2d 138 (1961). … United States v. Morton Salt Co., 338 U.S. 632, 652 , 70 S.Ct. 357 , 94 L.Ed. 401 (1950); Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. Walling, 327 U.S. 186, 216 , 66 S.Ct. 494 , 90 L.Ed. 614 (1946); Civil Aeronautics Board v.

Levin v. Mississippi River Corp.

47 F.R.D. 294 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 15, 1969

See, e. g., Nuesse v. Camp, supra, 385 F.2d at 702 . … See e. g., Kind v. Markham, 7 F.R.D. 265 (S.D.N.Y.1945); Peterson v. United States, 41 F.R.D. 131 (D.Minn.1966); Nuesse v. Camp, 128 U.S.App.D.C. 172 , 385 F.2d 694 (1967).

New York Marine & General Insurance v. Tradeline

186 F.R.D. 317 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 16, 1999

See pp. 1-2 of 9/21/98 rejection letter from Chalos & Brown, Exh. 6 to 1/20/99 Nicoletti aff.; Complaint ¶¶ 8-23. … As to the document subpoena served on Chalos & Brown, I will adjourn it without date if, by March 2, Mr.

In Re Knickerbocker Steamboat Co.

139 F. 713 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 13, 1905

The answer was as follows: “Second: — Do not know of own personal knowledge of any officer being on board during the year 1904. Annexed hereto is copy of certificate of Inspection. … My attention has been called by the exceptant to the recent case in the New York Supreme Court of People v. Davy, 94 N. Y.

Buchbinder v. Bowen

709 F. Supp. 389 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 15, 1989

Richardson, 402 U.S. at 401 , 91 S.Ct. at 1427 (quoting Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 305 U.S. 197, 229 , 59 S.Ct. 206, 216-17 , 83 L.Ed. 126 (1938)). … v.

Resolution Trust Corp. v. Best Products Co. (In Re Best Products Co.)

177 B.R. 791 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 20, 1995

To the same effect is the RTC’s reference to Ward v. Brown, 22 F.3d 516 (2d Cir.1994). … Ward v. Brown, 22 F.3d at 519 .