Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.59s
Chris-Craft Industries, Inc. v. PIPER AIRCRAFT CORPORATION
303 F. Supp. 191 · District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 19, 1969
Holman & Co. v. Securities & Exch. … See Kauder v. United Board & Carton Corp., 199 F.Supp. 420, 424 (S.D.N.Y.1961); Mack v. Mishkin, 172 F.Supp. 885, 889 (S.D.N.Y.1959).
Cited 6 timesPublishedUnited States ex rel. Montgomery v. Wallack
255 F. Supp. 566 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 16, 1966
Palese ripped the back seat out, crawled into the trunk and removed a brown leather brief case similiar to the one he had observed Shaw place there. … Wilson v. United States, 162 U.S. 613, 619 , 16 S.Ct. 895 , 40 L.Ed. 1090 (1896) ; United States ex rel. Lupo v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedMokhiber on Behalf of Ford Motor Co. v. Cohn
608 F. Supp. 616 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 15, 1985
(City of Detroit v. Grinnell (2d Cir.1974) 495 F.2d 448, 469, 470 ; see Mills v. … Blau v. Rayette-Faberge, supra; Gilson v. Chock Full O'Nuts (2d Cir.1964) 331 F.2d 107 ; Smolowe v. Delendo (2d Cir.1943) 136 F.2d 231 , cert. denied, 320 U.S. 751 , 64 S.Ct. 56 , 88 L.Ed. 446 ; Dottenheim v.
Cited 11 timesPublished13 F. Cas. 157 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 15, 1875
Aymar v. Astor, 6 Cow. 266 ; Laveroni v. Drury, 16 Eng. Law & Eq. 510; Kay v. Wheeler, L. R. 2 C. P. 302; The Miletus [Case No. 9,545]; Kirkland v. The Fame [Id. 7,845], in this court, Dec. 1861. … This being so, the doctrine settled in the case of Railroad Co. v. Lockwood, 17 Wall. [84 U.
Cited 3 timesPublishedRose v. Village of Upper Nyack, NY
669 F. Supp. 654 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 23, 1987
In Giulini v. … Similarly, in Simmons v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedUnited States v. National Sugar Refining Co.
113 F. Supp. 157 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 30, 1953
The remedial purpose of the August 1947 amendment of section 1802(a) of the Code was referred to in United States v. … Empire Trust Co. v. Hoey, 2 Cir., 103 F.2d 430 at page 432.
Cited 9 timesPublishedFeder Ex Rel. IVAX Corp. v. Frost
474 F. Supp. 2d 520 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 15, 2007
See also Brink v. Union Carbide Corp., 41 F.Supp.2d 406, 413-14 (S.D.N.Y.1999); see also Goenaga v. March of Dimes Birth Defects Foundation, 51 F.3d 14, 18 (2d Cir.1995); Anderson v. … In addition, the undisputed evidence is that Frost specifically absented himself from the Board of Directors’ meeting and vote at which NAVI’s president was authorized by the Board to sell stock from its portfolio, in which
Cited 1 timesPublishedKaye v. Fast Food Operators, Inc.
99 F.R.D. 161 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 16, 1983
Chasins v. … Steinberg v. Carey, 470 F.Supp. 471, 476 (S.D.N.Y.1979) (Weinfeld, J.). Bonime v. Doyle, supra, 416 F.Supp. at 1384 .
Cited 8 timesPublished856 F. Supp. 821 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 6, 1994
In Saulpaugh v. … See Strauss v. Microsoft Corp., 814 F.Supp. at 1193-94 ; see also Wilder v.
Cited 1 timesPublished46 F. Supp. 104 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 15, 1942
Tinker v. Colwell, 193 U.S. 473 , page 485, 24 S.Ct. 505 , 48 L.Ed. 754 ; Brown v. Garey et al., 267 N.Y. 167 , 196 N.E. 12 , 98 A.L.R. 1449 , certiorari denied 296 U.S. 615 , 56 S.Ct. 136 , 80 L.Ed. 437 ; Kavanaugh v. … McIntyre, 210 N.Y. 175, 182 , 104 N.E. 135 , affirmed 242 U.S. 138 , 37 S.Ct. 38 , 61 L.Ed. 205 ; see also Campbell v. Gates, 236 N.Y. 457 , 141 N.E. 914 .
Cited 9 timesPublishedLugo v. Milford Management Corp.
956 F. Supp. 1120 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 18, 1997
.”); Board of Regents of the University of the State of New York et al. v. Tomanio, 446 U.S. 478 , 100 S.Ct. 1790 , 64 L.Ed.2d 440 (1980). … See, Sabetay v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedDidden v. Village of Port Chester
304 F. Supp. 2d 548 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 10, 2004
right to appeal the Board’s Findings. … Moccio v.
Cited 4 timesPublished40 F. Supp. 168 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 6, 1941
These cases were reviewed by Judge Tuttle in Spencer Kellogg & Sons, Inc., v. Great Lakes Transit Corp., D.C.E.D. Mich. S.D., 32 F.Supp. 520 . … Andean Trading Co. v. Pacific Steam Navigation Co., 2 Cir., 263 F. 559 ; Barr v. International Mercantile Marine Co., 2 Cir., 29 F.2d 26 .
Cited 14 timesPublished575 F. Supp. 772 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 21, 1983
Under Section 355 of the New York Education Law, the board of trustees is given authority to regulate tuition and fees within the SUNY system. … Powell v. Workmen’s Compensation Board, 327 F.2d 131 (2d Cir.1964). See Child v. Beame, supra, 417 F.Supp. at 1025-26 .
Cited 0 timesPublished74 F. Supp. 683 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 26, 1947
See, also, Browning v. Fidelity Trust Co., 3 Cir., 250 F. 321, 325 . Was paragraph 26 included in the original complaints with an actual intent to mislead or deceive? … Co. v. Brown, D.C.S.D.N.Y., 64 F.Supp. 168 .
Cited 10 timesPublishedWertheim v. Continental Ry. & Trust Co.
15 F. 716 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 17, 1883
Louis, Missouri. ■ Mayor of Arundel v. Holmes, 8 Dowl. 118, (1839;) Woolmer v. Devereux, 2 M. & G. 758; King v. King, 4 Taunt. 666; Browning v. Aylwin, 7 B. & C. 204, Mayor of Arundel v. Holmes, 8 Dowl. 118; Rowe v. … Ex parte Brown, 72 Mo. 83 ; Henisler v. Freedman, 2 Pars. Sel. Cas. 274; U. S. v. Babcock, 3 Dill. 566 ; U. S. v. Hunter, ante, 712. Ex parte Brown, 72 Mo. 83 . Hensler v. Freedman, 2 Pars. Sel. Cas. 274. Davies v.
Cited 14 timesPublished181 F. Supp. 2d 323 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 9, 2002
The Agreement was re-initialed and re-executed by Brown, Chaparro and Glaser. … See United States v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedLocal 32B-32J, Service Employees International Union v. Bradley Cleaning Contractors, Inc.
583 F. Supp. 1536 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 20, 1984
See International Brotherhood of Boilermakers v. Combustion Engineering, Inc., 337 F.Supp. 1349 (D.Conn.1971); see also Central Motor Express, Inc. v. General Drivers, 407 F.Supp. 1217, 1222 (W.D.Ky.1975). … See Sobel v. Hertz, Warner & Co., 469 F.2d 1211, 1214 (2d Cir.1972).
Cited 0 timesPublished202 F. 962 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 11, 1913
Apparently upon this evidence the board of .examiners in chief granted the patent. … Smith v. Nichols, 21 Wall. 119 , 22 L. Ed. 566 ; Roberts v. Ryer, 91 U. S. 150 , 23 L. Ed. 267 ; Dunbar v. Meyers, 94 U. S. 187 , 24 L.
Cited 1 timesPublishedKnoeffler v. Town of Mamakating
87 F. Supp. 2d 322 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 15, 2000
See Smith v. … be prescribed by the Town Board.”
Cited 22 timesPublished
Ask Donna