Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.32s
Taiyo Americas, Inc. v. Honey Transport, Inc.
464 F. Supp. 1249 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 1, 1979
Tebbe & Sons Co. v. Brown Express, 14 Federal Carriers Cases ¶ 81,348 (Tex.Sup.Ct.1960); Strickland Transportation Co. v. … Wagner, 16 Federal Carriers Cases ¶ 81,-598 (Tex.Ct.Civ.App.1963); Strickland Transportation Co. v. Brown Express, 13 Federal Carriers Cases ¶ 81,265 (Tex.Ct.Civ.App. 1959).
Cited 1 timesPublishedWeaver v. NEW YORK CITY EMP. RETIREMENT SYSTEM
717 F. Supp. 1039 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 21, 1989
Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532 , 105 S.Ct. 1487 , 84 L.Ed.2d 494 (1985); Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). … Balash v. New York City Employees' Retirement System, 34 N.Y.2d 654 , 311 N.E.2d 649 , 355 N.Y.S.2d 577 (1974); see also Brown v.
Cited 0 timesPublished149 F. Supp. 140 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 22, 1956
Lauritzen v. Larsen, 345 U.S. 571 , 73 S.Ct. 921 , 97 L.Ed. 1254 ; Koziol v. The Fylgia, 2 Cir., 1956, 230 F.2d 651 . … Lauritzen v. Larsen, supra. Motion granted; settle order.
Cited 1 timesPublishedBerkshire Fashions, Inc. v. Sara Lee Corp.
729 F. Supp. 21 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 18, 1990
Inc. v. Arica Institute, Inc., 194 U.S. P.Q. 32 (S.D.N.Y.1976), aff'd per curiam, 195 U.S.P.Q. 466 , 557 F.2d 338 (2d Cir 1977); Lambda Electronics v. … Lambda Technologies, Inc., 515 F.Supp. 915 (S.D.N.Y.1981); Playboy Enterprises v. Chuckleberry Pub., Inc., 511 F.Supp. 486 (S.D.N.Y.1981); Quaker State Oil Refining Corp. v.
Cited 7 timesPublished162 F. 56 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 22, 1908
The nature of salvage in this regard is compendiously stated by Brown, D. J., in International Navigation Co. v. Atlantic Mutual Ins. Co. (D. C.) 100 Fed. 312 , affirmed 108 Fed. 987 , 48 C. C. … Co. v. Anderson, L. R. 10 App. Cas. 107.
Cited 3 timesPublished36 F. 504 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 4, 1888
Brown, J. … Per Nelson, J., Williamson v. Barrett, 13 How. 110 -112; The Potomac, 105 U. S. 631 ; The Mayflower, 1 Brown, Adm. 380-387. This mode of ascertaining the damages in such cases has long been applied in this court.
Cited 6 timesPublished361 F. Supp. 2d 328 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 21, 2005
In Younger v. … Corp. v. McGowan, 282 F.3d 191 , 199 (2d Cir.2002).
Cited 0 timesPublished20 F. 333 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 21, 1884
BrowN, J. … was in fact turned to starboard, as the master testifies, in order to put the helm to port. (6) All these various considerations lead me to adhere to the usual rule which gives greater credit to the statements of those on board
Cited 0 timesPublished802 F. Supp. 2d 491 · District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 11, 2011
Finally, the Court is persuaded by Judge Sweet’s decision in State Teachers Retirement Board v. … about board composition.
Cited 9 timesPublishedMason Tenders District Council Pension Fund v. Messera
4 F. Supp. 2d 293 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 7, 1998
In Friedman v. … See Paul Kadair, Inc. v.
Cited 4 timesPublished29 F. Cas. 453 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 15, 1831
De Lovio v. … The case of Hand v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedGerety v. Inland Newspaper Representatives, Inc.
152 F. Supp. 31 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 13, 1957
Henderson v. Midwest Refining Co., 10 Cir., 1930, 43 F.2d 23 ; Bator v. Hungarian Commercial Bank of Pest, D.C.S.D.N.Y.1950, 90 F.Supp. 609 ; Baron v. Brown, D.C.S.D.N.Y.1949, 83 F.Supp. 520 . … Brown and Henderson v.
Cited 1 timesPublished188 F. Supp. 627 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 10, 1960
She then processed her appeal to the Civil Service Commission Board of Ap *628 peals and Review in Washington, which affirmed the initial ruling. … See Adamietz v. Smith, 3 Cir., 1960, 273 F.2d 385 ; Hicks v. Summerfield, 1958, 104 U.S.App.D.C. 286 , 261 F.2d 752 ; Benenanti v. Young, 1955, 95 U.S.App.D.C. 120 , 220 F.2d 383 ; Payne v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedUnited States Ex Rel. Teper v. Miller
87 F. Supp. 285 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 1, 1949
A Board of Special Inquiry of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, after hearings, excluded Teper from admission to the United States. … Teper contests the legality of the exclusion order on the grounds that: (a) The Board of Special Inquiry did not have before it the charge or indictment upon which Teper was convicted.
Cited 9 timesPublishedBelgian Mission for Economic Cooperation v. Zarati Steamship Co.
90 F. Supp. 741 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 25, 1950
Spreckels Sugar Co. v. South Atlantic Steamship Line, D.C.S.D.Ga.1944, 55 F. *742 Supp. 670 . The agency relationship must also exist at the time of service of process. Miller v. The Sultana & Browning S. S. … [See Bartholomew & Co. v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedWallace v. International Organization of Masters, Mates & Pilots
547 F. Supp. 155 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 17, 1982
Moynahan v. Pari-Mutuel Employees Guild, 317 F.2d 209 (9th Cir.), cert, denied, 375 U.S. 911 , 84 S.Ct. 207 , 11 L.Ed.2d 150 (1963). . Cf. Board of Regents v. … Y.1977); Morpurgo v. State Board of Higher Education, 423 F.Supp. 704, 713-14 (S.D.N.Y.1976). See also Kauffman v.
Cited 4 timesPublished10 F.2d 817 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 5, 1924
Tolibia & Co., Inc., v. S. S. Orion (C. C. A.) 290 F. 379 . … Guiness v. Miller (D. C.) 291 F. 769 , affirmed 299 F. 538 , C. C. A. 2d Circuit, April 14, 1924.
Cited 21 timesPublishedBraddick v. Federation of Shorthand Reporters
115 F. Supp. 550 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 31, 1953
Precision Fabricators, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, 2 Cir., 204 F.2d 567 . . Colby v. Klune, 2 Cir., 178 F.2d 872 ; Arnstein v. Porter, 2 Cir., 154 F.2d 464 ; Dyer v. … Gibbons, 8 Cir., 172 F.2d 970 ; National Labor Relations Board v. E. C. Atkins & Co., 331 U.S. 398, 414 , 67 S.Ct. 1265 , 91 L.Ed. 1563 ; National Labor Relations Board v.
Cited 1 timesPublished359 F. Supp. 604 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 22, 1972
Mercado’s Board considered itself administratively prohibited, as a matter of law, from considering his claim. In Palmer v. … In Fitts v.
Cited 0 timesPublished11 F. Cas. 451 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 15, 1872
Supp. 31, 45, and by the supreme court of the United States in Newton v. Stebbins (1850) 10 How. [51 U. S.] 586, 606; McCready v. Goldsmith (1855) 18 How. [59 U. S.] 89, 91; and Rogers v. The St. … In the case of Dolner v.
Cited 4 timesPublished
Ask Donna