Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.35s
District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 27, 2026
Petrello v. White, 533 F.3d 110, 113 (2d Cir. 2008); see Wallace v. Morse, No. 25-1129, 2025 WL 3083068, at *1 (2d Cir. … See United States v. Pilcher, 950 F.3d 39, 44 (2d Cir. 2020). The U.S.
Cited 0 timesUnknown265 F. Supp. 2d 273 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 28, 2003
Gant v. … Resnik v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedChambers & Associates v. Trans World Airlines
533 F. Supp. 426 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 2, 1982
The applicable law It is well-established that valid tariffs filed with the Civil Aeronautics Board govern the rights and liabilities between airlines and their domestic passengers. See North American Phillips Corp. v. … . *428 See also Tishman & Lipp, Inc. v.
Cited 3 timesPublished109 F. 264 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 3, 1901
BROWN, District Judge. … This principle was applied by the supreme court in the case of Strang v. Bradner, 114 U. S. 555 , 5 Sup. Ct. 1038, 29 L.
Cited 2 timesPublishedCitizens and Southern Securities Corp. v. Braten
733 F. Supp. 655 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 16, 1990
See Bennett v. … Brown, III; 7. grant plaintiff’s motion to amend the complaint. SO ORDERED. 1 .
Cited 5 timesPublishedAmerican-Hawaiian S. S. Co. v. United States
92 F. Supp. 785 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 20, 1950
In United States v. … See Merchants’ Banking Co. v. Cargo of the Afton, 2 Cir., 134 F. 727 , at page 731; and Toledo Scale Co. v. Computing Scale Co., 261 U.S. 399 , at page 424, 43 S.Ct. 458 , 67 L.Ed. 719 .
Cited 2 timesPublishedUnited States ex rel. Patti v. Curran
22 F.2d 314 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 10, 1926
True, the Board of Review, upon whose recommendation the Second Assistant Secretary affirmed the decision of the Board of Special Inquiry, said: “Both aliens are unable to read, and on their own statement that they had been … S. v. Curran (C. C. A.) 299 F. 206 , and U. S. v. Curran (D. C.) 299 F. 214 , were decided.
Cited 5 timesPublished438 F. Supp. 145 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 3, 1977
for the rendering of the Board’s decision is from eight to ten weeks. … England v. Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners, 375 U.S. 411, 415-416 , [ 84 S.Ct. 461, 465 , 11 L.Ed.2d 440 ].
Cited 6 timesPublished254 F. Supp. 923 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 11, 1966
The brown paper bag, openly exposed and still in Beigel’s hand, was seized from him by Cahill. … “[A] brown paper bag, in my reading of narcotic eases and limited experience with them, seems to be the copyrighted method of transportation for narcotics.” United States ex rel. Wilson v.
Cited 9 timesPublished227 F. 958 · District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 9, 1915
Judge Townsend in the case of Kaempfer v. Taylor, in the Circuit Court for Connecticut, 78 Fed. 795 , enunciated the same doctrine, as did Mr. Justice Brown in Cleaver v. Traders’ Insurance Co. (C. … In the case of Coy v. Perkins (C. C.) 13 Fed. 111 , Mr.
Cited 4 timesPublishedBear Mill Mfg. Co. v. United States
93 F. Supp. 988 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 7, 1950
The Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Elbert v. … Moir v. United States, 1 Cir., 149 F.2d 455, 460 ; Brooks v. Driscoll, 3 Cir., 114 F.2d 426, 429 .
Cited 6 timesPublishedIn re Aluminum Warehousing Antitrust Litigation
90 F. Supp. 3d 219 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 3, 2015
Brown, — U.S.-, 131 S.Ct. 2846, 2851 , 180 L.Ed.2d 796 (2011)); accord Sonera Holding B.V. v. … Two recent Supreme Court decisions are also relevant to this Court’s due process analysis: Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown, — U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 2846 , 180 L.Ed.2d 796 (2011), and Daimler AG v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedCatskill Development, L.L.C. v. Park Place Entertainment Corp.
204 F. Supp. 2d 647 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 8, 2002
Catskill Development, L.L.C. v. Park Place Entertainment Corp., 206 F.R.D. 78 (S.D.N.Y.2002). … Saratoga County Chamber of Commerce Inc. v. Pataki, 740 N.Y.S.2d 733 (N.Y.A.D. 3d Dept.2002).
Cited 2 timesPublished13 F. Cas. 213 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 15, 1874
that, while the boat was in tow of the tug, the boiler of the tug exploded, and caused the boat to sink; and that the explosion and consequent damage were the result of the negligence of the servants of the respondents on board … Story, Ag. § 453a; Sproul v. Hemmingway, 14 Pick. 1 ; Sturgis v. Boyer, 24 How. [65 U. S.] 110, 124.
Cited 3 timesPublishedHadges v. Yonkers Racing Corp.
845 F. Supp. 1037 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 14, 1994
Hadges v. Yonkers Racing Corp. decision at 4. … Under Younger v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedVicon Fiber Optics Corp. v. Scrivo
201 F. Supp. 2d 216 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 15, 2002
First Nationwide Bank v. … See Schnell v.
Cited 9 timesPublishedM. Prusman Ltd. v. M/V NATHANEL
684 F. Supp. 372 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 31, 1988
R.Civ.P. 56 granting summary judgment against defendant Javelin Line (“Javelin”) for damages sustained to plaintiffs’ cargo while in Javelin’s custody on board the M/V NATHANEL. … The subject containers and their cargo were damaged while on board the M/V NATHANEL during the voyage from Hamburg to Ashdod. A marine surveyor, Menachem Katzan of M.
Cited 9 timesPublishedUNIVERSITY HOSP., NY UNIV. MED. CTR. v. Bowen
684 F. Supp. 1234 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 2, 1988
Luke's Hospital of Bethlehem v. … Berry v. Schweiker, 675 F.2d 464, 467 (2d Cir.1982); Aubeuf v. Schweiker, 649 F.2d 107, 112 (2d Cir.1981); Ghazibayat v. Schweiker, 554 F.Supp. 1005, 1013 (S.D.N. Y.1983).
Cited 0 timesPublished500 F. Supp. 1067 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 15, 1980
Chicago Board of Trade v. United States, 246 U.S. 231, 238 , 38 S.Ct. 242, 244 , 62 L.Ed. 683 (1918). … Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294, 320 , 82 S.Ct. 1502 , 8 L.Ed.2d 510 (1962).
Cited 9 timesPublishedSoptra Fabrics Corp. v. Stafford Knitting Mills, Inc.
365 F. Supp. 1199 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 28, 1973
See Bailie v. Fisher, 103 U.S.App.D.C. 331 , 258 F.2d 425, 426 (1958); Bouve v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp., 74 App.D.C. 271 , 122 F.2d 51 (1941); Gardenia Flowers, Inc. v. … See, e. g., Concord Fabrics, Inc. v. Marcus Bros. Textile Corp., 409 F.2d 1315, 1316 (2d Cir. 1969); Ideal Toy Corp. v. Fab-Lu Ltd., 360 F.2d 1021 (2d Cir. 1966). See also 2 M.
Reversed by Soptra Fabrics Corp. v. Stafford Knitting Mills, Inc., 490 F.2d 1092 (1974)Cited 1 timesPublished
Ask Donna