Case law

Manhattan Transp. Co. v. Mayor

37 F. 160 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 11, 1888

Brown, J. … Christian v. Van Tassel, 12 Fed. Rep. 884. The case of Smith v. Havemeyer, 32 Fed. Rep. 844, has been recently affirmed in the circuit court, reasserting the same doctrine. 36 Fed. Rep. 927.

Lewis v. Adler

331 F. Supp. 1258 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 21, 1971

the extent of the board’s knowledge. … To be sure, the board did not advise the stockholders of every item of information within its ken, but such material as was omitted falls within the observation of Judge Tyler in Penn Mart Realty Co. v.

In re Schultz

109 F. 264 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 3, 1901

BROWN, District Judge. … This principle was applied by the supreme court in the case of Strang v. Bradner, 114 U. S. 555 , 5 Sup. Ct. 1038, 29 L.

United States Trust Co. of New York v. Alpert

163 F.R.D. 409 · District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 21, 1995

Browning in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. … Thus, in Marcera v.

Fifth Avenue Peace Parade Committee v. Hoover

327 F. Supp. 238 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 28, 1971

See Fein v. Selective Service System Local Board No. 7, 430 F.2d 376 , 378 n.1 (2d Cir. 1970); Wolff v. Selective Service Local Board No. 16, 372 F.2d 817, 826 (2d Cir. 1967). … Chief Judge Lumbard has articulated this view in Fein v. Selective Service System Local Board No. 7, supra, 430 F.2d at 384-385 (Lumbard, Ch.

Fund of Funds, Ltd. v. Arthur Andersen & Co.

545 F. Supp. 1314 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 16, 1982

expanded Board of Directors of F.O.F. … Brown Carr Fund C. Henry Buhl, III Hedge and York Funds Allan F. Conwill Computer Directions and Douglas Fund *1329 Edward M. Cowett Groo and Real Estate Growth Funds Pierre A. Rinfret Meid and Technology Funds Eric D.

Isaacs v. OCE Business Services Inc.

968 F. Supp. 2d 564 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 4, 2013

See Brown v. St. Paul Travelers Co., 331 Fed.Appx. 68 , 69-70 (2d Cir.2009) (Summary Order); Manigault v. … Brown v. St. Paul Travelers Co., 559 F.Supp.2d 288, 292 (W.D.N.Y.2008), aff.d, 331 Fed.Appx. 68 (2d Cir.2009).

Denton v. McKee

332 F. Supp. 2d 659 · District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 24, 2004

McKee was the Town Supervisor and a member of the five-member Town Board, which makes policy for the Town. Mr. Barton and Ms. Mauro were also members of the Town Board. … Sims v. Artuz, 230 F.3d 14, 20 (2d Cir.2000).

Mateo v. Phillips

361 F. Supp. 2d 328 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 21, 2005

In Younger v. … Corp. v. McGowan, 282 F.3d 191 , 199 (2d Cir.2002).

Sperry Products, Inc. v. Association of American Railroads

44 F. Supp. 660 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 12, 1942

Board of Trustees of Ohio State University, 195 U.S. 207 , at page 214, 25 S.Ct. 24, 27 , 49 L.Ed. 160 , “Here the averment is only that the defendant board of trustees is a citizen of and domiciled in Ohio; not that the … Board of Trustees of Ohio State University, supra, the court held that the board was entitled to sue and be sued by their collective name, and would be bound by a judgment against it in that name, provided the bill had contained

EFS Marketing, Inc. v. Russ Berrie & Co., Inc.

836 F. Supp. 128 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 27, 1993

Defendant Russell Berrie is the Chairman of the Board, the Chief Executive Officer, and the majority shareholder of the corporate defendant. Both sides in this dispute market lines of troll dolls. … See Phis Products, 722 F.2d at 1004-05 ; Brown v. Quiniou, 744 F.Supp. 463, 467 (S.D.N.Y.1990).

Gravatt v. City of New York

53 F. Supp. 2d 388 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 24, 1999

In Fuszek v. Royal King Fisheries, 98 F.3d 514 (9th Cir.1996), the plaintiff, a Jones Act seaman, was injured on board a fishing vessel while operating a fish processing machine. … In Fuszek v. Royal King Fisheries, 98 F.3d 514 (9th Cir.1996), the plaintiff, a Jones Act seaman, was injured on board a fishing vessel while operating a fish processing machine.

Ramachandar v. Sobol

838 F. Supp. 100 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 15, 1993

In 1985, the New York State Board for Professional Medical Conduct (“Board”) charged plaintiff with professional misconduct for practicing while his ability was impaired by mental illness. 1 ' A hearing committee of the Board … C. v. Wheaton, 916 F.2d 69 , 74 (2nd Cir.1990). B.

Sedighim v. Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette, Inc.

167 F. Supp. 2d 639 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 5, 2001

The decisions of the board of DLJ and Holdings would be subject to the board of directors general fiduciary duty. … It quoted with approval Rondeau v.

Copco Steel & Engineering Company v. S/S ALWAKI

131 F. Supp. 332 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 6, 1955

Stirnimann v. The San Diego, 2 Cir., 148 F.2d 141, 143 ; The Glasgow Maru, 2 Cir., 102 F.2d 450, 451 ; Albers Bros. Milling Co. v. … Higgins v. Anglo-Algerian S.S. Co., 2 Cir., 248 F. 386 ; Olivier Straw Goods Corporation v. Osaka Shosen Kaisha, 2 Cir., 27 F.2d 129 .

American-Hawaiian S. S. Co. v. United States

92 F. Supp. 785 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 20, 1950

In United States v. … See Merchants’ Banking Co. v. Cargo of the Afton, 2 Cir., 134 F. 727 , at page 731; and Toledo Scale Co. v. Computing Scale Co., 261 U.S. 399 , at page 424, 43 S.Ct. 458 , 67 L.Ed. 719 .

United States ex rel. Patti v. Curran

22 F.2d 314 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 10, 1926

True, the Board of Review, upon whose recommendation the Second Assistant Secretary affirmed the decision of the Board of Special Inquiry, said: “Both aliens are unable to read, and on their own statement that they had been … S. v. Curran (C. C. A.) 299 F. 206 , and U. S. v. Curran (D. C.) 299 F. 214 , were decided.

Boe v. Colello

438 F. Supp. 145 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 3, 1977

for the rendering of the Board’s decision is from eight to ten weeks. … England v. Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners, 375 U.S. 411, 415-416 , [ 84 S.Ct. 461, 465 , 11 L.Ed.2d 440 ].

Vides v. Amelio

265 F. Supp. 2d 273 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 28, 2003

Gant v. … Resnik v.

United States v. Beigel

254 F. Supp. 923 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 11, 1966

The brown paper bag, openly exposed and still in Beigel’s hand, was seized from him by Cahill. … “[A] brown paper bag, in my reading of narcotic eases and limited experience with them, seems to be the copyrighted method of transportation for narcotics.” United States ex rel. Wilson v.