Case law

In re Ketchum

1 F. 840 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 6, 1880

This seat in the board was actually used as part of the business capital of those bankrupts as stock-brokers. … In the case of Hyde v.

In Re Estey

6 F. Supp. 570 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 6, 1934

Brown & Co. (D. C.) 171 F. 254 ; Blessing v. Blanchard (C. C. A.) 223 F. 35 , Ann. Cas. 1916B, 341.

Gardner v. Bibbins

9 F. Cas. 1159 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 5, 1833

Thome v. White [Case No. 13,989]. … The master was on board at this last occurrence, and it is to be intended that it passed under his notice.

Brownsville Community Council, Inc. v. Banco De Ponce

567 F. Supp. 849 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 16, 1983

In Philo Smith & Co., Inc. v. … Thirty-five BCC board members (two-thirds of the board) were elected in August of 1972 in accordance with CDA’s election policy.

Van Den Toorn v. Leeming

70 F. 251 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 24, 1895

BROWN, District Judge. … Shipp. & Adm. 383; The Ontario, 37 Fed. 220 ; Strang v. Scott, 14 App. Cas. 601, 608), unless the exceptions in the bill of lading excuse the ship from the consequences of this defect.

Bruce & Co. v. Bothwell

8 F.R.D. 45 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 14, 1948

The amended complaint further alleges that all members of the Board of Directors of Gulf participated in the alleged wrongful acts; are hostile, and that plaintiff has not requested the corporation or its Board of Directors … Stone v. Holly Hill Fruit Products Co., 5 Cir., 56 F.2d 553 ; Long v. Stites, 6 Cir., 88 F.2d 554 , certiorari denied 301 U.S. 706 , 57 S. Ct. 939 , 81 L.Ed. 1360 ; Yates Ranch Oil & Royalties v.

Kaufman v. Wolfson

153 F. Supp. 253 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 27, 1957

In Blaustein v. … In the case of Irving Trust Co. v.

Shenk v. Karmazin

868 F. Supp. 2d 299 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 25, 2012

White v. Panic, 783 A.2d 543 , 554 n. 36 (Del.2001). “When seeking the affirmative vote of stockholders, the Board has a duty *309 to disclose all material information.” In re Santa Fe Pac. Corp. … See Taylor v.

United States v. City of New York

463 F. Supp. 604 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 26, 1978

The Appeal Board’s decision to issue an operating license to Columbia was affirmed upon judicial review. See Morningside Renewal Council, Inc. v. … In Northern States Power Company v. State of Minnesota, 447 F.2d 1143 (8th Cir. 1971), aff’d mem., Minnesota v.

Solomon

District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 29, 2025

1:25-CV-6919 (LTS) -against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL BOARD … Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue).

The Jason

162 F. 56 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 22, 1908

The nature of salvage in this regard is compendiously stated by Brown, D. J., in International Navigation Co. v. Atlantic Mutual Ins. Co. (D. C.) 100 Fed. 312 , affirmed 108 Fed. 987 , 48 C. C. … Co. v. Anderson, L. R. 10 App. Cas. 107.

McKinney v. Huntsville Sch. Dist.

345 F. Supp. 3d 1071 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 12, 2018

Subsequently, the School Board expelled him for 365 days. … First, Principal Enix and the John Doe School Board Members appear as Defendants only in Counts IV, V, and VI of the Complaint.

Impala Trading Corp. v. Hawthorne Lumber Co.

200 F. Supp. 261 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 5, 1961

Since that time the cargo has remained on board and the ship has remained at Puerto Cortez. … See also Burns Bros. v. Long Island R. Co., 176 F.2d 950 (2 Cir.1949); Yokohama Specie Bank v. Chengting T. Wang, 113 ,F.2d 329 (9 Cir.1940).

Cerussi v. Union College

144 F. Supp. 2d 265 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 6, 2001

See Promuto v. Waste Mgmt. … See Clesi, 2001 WL 225241 , at *3 (citing Brown v. Dow Coming Corp., No. 93 Civ. 5510, 1996 WL 257614 , at. *2 (S.D.N.Y. May 15, 1996)). Thus, this factor also supports transfer. D.

Manhat v. United States

113 F. Supp. 595 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 30, 1953

He was again taken into custody and given a hearing before a Special Board of the Immigration and Naturalization Service. That Board ordered him excluded. He appealed to the Board of Immigration Appeals. … See The Mercier, D.C.D.Or., 5 F.Supp. 511, 512 , affirmed without opinion, Anderson v. Compagnie Maritime Belge Society, 9 Cir., 72 F.2d 1008 .

Fertile Land, Ltd. v. Beame

445 F. Supp. 548 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 6, 1977

McCoy v. Jordan, 241 N.Y. 71, 77 , 148 N.E. 793, 794 (1925); Acme Realty Co. v. Schinasi, 215 N.Y. 495, 502 , 109 N.E. 577, 579 (1925); Deshong v. City of New York, 176 N.Y. 475, 483 , 68 N.E. 880, 882 (1903). … E. g., Opp Cotton Mills v. Administrator, 312 U.S. 126, 152-153 , 61 S.Ct. 524 , 85 L.Ed. 624 (1941); Madera v. Board of Education, 386 F.2d 778, 785 (2d Cir. 1967).

Peterson v. Continental Airlines, Inc.

970 F. Supp. 246 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 7, 1997

See Hodges v. Delta Airlines, Inc., 44 F.3d 334, 336 (5th Cir.1995) (air carrier service includes, inter alia, ticketing boarding procedures, baggage handling and provision of food and drink). … Id.; see also Curley v.

Zucker v. United States

578 F. Supp. 1239 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 19, 1984

On March 24, 1979, plaintiffs sought administrative review by the Commission’s Appeal Review Board whose functions were assumed by the merit Systems Protection Board. … Railroad Retirement Board v. Fritz, 449 U.S. 166 , 101 S.Ct. 453 , 66 L.Ed.2d 368 (1980); Hisquierdo v. Hisquierdo, 439 U.S. 572, 575 , 99 S.Ct. 802, 805 , 59 L.Ed.2d 1 (1979); Flemming v. Nestor, supra; Stouper v.

In re Cohn

98 F. 75 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 9, 1899

BROWN', District Judge. Upon the voluminous evidence submitted, I think the proceedings against the witness Lena Williamson, a daughter of the bankrupt, have exceeded the proper limits. … Smith v. Mason, 14 Wall. 419 , 20 L. Ed. 748 ; Marshall v. Knox, 16 Wall. 553 , 21 L. Ed. 481 . For the same reason she could not be treated as a defendant in the proceeding before the referee.

New York SMSA Limited Partnership v. The Town of Carmel

District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 20, 2022

. §§ 332(c) and 253(a) against the Town of Carmel (the “Town”), the Town of Carmel Town Board, the Town of Carmel Planning Board (the “Planning Board”), the Town of Carmel Zoning Board of Appeals (the “ZBA”), the Town of … App’x 8, 15 (2d Cir. 2011); see also Brown v. New York, 2022 WL 221343, at *2 (2d Cir. Jan. 26, 2022).