Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnysd

10,000+ results

1.37s

  • Johnson v. Rockefeller

    365 F. Supp. 377 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 9, 1973

    See Green v. Board of Elections, 380 F.2d 445 (2d Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 1048 , 88 S.Ct. 768 , 19 L.Ed.2d 840 (1968) (upholding statute denying convicted felon the right to vote); Fincher v. … Maynard v.

    Questioned by Jackson v. Mowery, 743 F. Supp. 600 (1990)Cited 34 timesPublished
  • Bronsted v. Advance

    60 F. 422 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 16, 1894

    BROWN, District Judge. … the services are performed, corresponding in amount to that allowed by law in the state, for similar services rendered by state officers, in a like capacity, particularly In chancery procedure. 1 Blatchf. 652 ; Hathaway v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • McFarland v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad

    993 F. Supp. 210 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 11, 1998

    Brown, 466 U.S. 147, 150 , 104 S.Ct. 1723, 1725 , 80 L.Ed.2d 196 (1984); South v. Saab Cars USA, Inc., 28 F.3d 9, 11-12 (2d Cir.1994); Pauling v. Secretary of Dep’t of Interior, 960 F.Supp. at 803 . … Irwin v. Department of Veterans Affairs, 498 U.S. at 95-96 , 111 S.Ct. at 457 ; Baldwin County Welcome Ctr. v. Brown, 466 U.S. at 151-52 , 104 S.Ct. at 1725-26 ; Briones v. Runyon, 101 F.3d at 290 ; South v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Weaver ex rel. Weaver v. New York City Employees' Retirement System

    717 F. Supp. 1039 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 21, 1989

    Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532 , 105 S.Ct. 1487 , 84 L.Ed.2d 494 (1985); Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). … Balash v. New York City Employees’ Retirement System, 34 N.Y.2d 654 , 311 N.E.2d 649 , 355 N.Y.S.2d 577 (1974); see also Brown v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Casanova Entertainment Group, Inc. v. City of New Rochelle

    375 F. Supp. 2d 321 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 29, 2005

    Bery v. City of New York, 97 F.3d 689, 693-94 (2d Cir.1996) (citing Elrod v. … See Crown Street Enter. v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Aileen Mills Co. v. Ojay Mills, Incorporated

    188 F. Supp. 138 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 24, 1960

    Brown v. Ford Motor Co., D.C.E.D.Mich.1944, 57 F.Supp. 825 ; S. R. Leon, Inc. v. Parfums Schiaparelli, D.C.S.D.N.Y.1940, 35 F.Supp. 641 ; Gasifier Mfg. Co. v. Ford Motor Co., D.C.E.D.Mo.1939, 1 F.R.D. 10 . … We agree thoroughly with the examiner and Board of Appeals in rejecting this contention by applicant.” (at page 704.) Circuit Judge Rogers in Ashley v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Mosdos Chofetz Chaim, Inc. v. Village of Wesley Hills

    815 F. Supp. 2d 679 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 26, 2011

    v. … The defendants named in the Chestnut Ridge Action were Ramapo, the Ramapo Town Board, the Ramapo Planning Board, the Ramapo Board of Appeals, YCC, and Scenic Development, LLC. See id.

    Cited 116 timesPublished
  • In Re South African Apartheid Litigation

    643 F. Supp. 2d 423 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 22, 2009

    (noting that Ernst-Otto Kramer is a member of the Rheinmetall AG management board); 2002 Rheinmetall DeTec Annual Report at 96 (noting that Kramer is chairman of DeTec's executive board), Ex. A to Olson Decl. … Corp. v.

    Cited 32 timesPublished
  • Port Authority Police Asian Jade Society of New York & New Jersey Inc. v. Port Authority

    681 F. Supp. 2d 456 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 14, 2010

    Passenger Corp. v. … Auth. v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • In re Wilder

    101 F. 104 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 19, 1900

    BROWN, District Judge. … Stewart v. Isidor, 5 Abb. Prac. (N. S.) 68; In re Jaycox, 8 N. B, R. 241, Fed. Cas. No. 7,242.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • De Masi v. Schumer

    608 F. Supp. 2d 516 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 31, 2009

    Brown, 481 F.3d 89, 96 (2d Cir.2007) (quoting Triestman v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, 470 F.3d 471, 474 (2d Cir.2006) (per curiam)). … See, e.g., Newell v. Brown, 981 F.2d 880, 887 (6th Cir.1992) ("For the federal judiciary to subject members of Congress to liability for simply doing their jobs would be unthinkable.”); Richards v.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Parness v. Lieblich

    90 F.R.D. 178 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 5, 1981

    E. g., Sackett v. Beaman, 399 F.2d 884 (9th Cir. 1968); Caddy-Imler Creations, Inc. v. Caddy, 299 F.2d 79 (9th Cir. 1962). Not all amendments are granted under all circumstances. Sobel v. … See, e. g., Mooney v. Vitolo, 435 F.2d 838 (2d Cir. 1970) (per curiam); Sackett v. Beaman, supra; Thomas v. Amerada Hess Corp., 393 F.Supp. 58, 78 (M.D.Pa.1975). We have an extremely complicated situation here.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Gottesman v. General Motors Corporation

    171 F. Supp. 661 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 23, 1959

    Shortly after the Supreme Court decided United States v. E. … United States v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, 1912, 226 U.S. 61, 95 , 33 S.Ct. 53 , 57 L.Ed. 124 . 4 . Cf. Berg v. Cincinnati, Newport & Covington Ry. Co., D.C.E.D.Ky.1944, 56 F.Supp. 842, 845 ; Pergament v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Fowler v. Vincent

    452 F. Supp. 449 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 6, 1978

    In its present motion, the State again relies on new law, Baxter v. … Brewer, 408 U.S. 471 , 92 S.Ct. 2593 , 33 L.Ed.2d 484 (1972), during his hearing before the Parole Board.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Zenith Radio Corp. v. Lehman

    121 F. Supp. 69 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 3, 1954

    It is of British origin and was first allowed in 1917 by the Commissioner of Patents for the United States Patent Office in Ex parte Brown, 1917, C.D. 22, 235 O.G. 1355 . … In the Hansen case the’Patent Office Board of Appeals was of the opinion that claims with reference'similar to the ones here in question “do not particularly point out the subject matter which appellant regards as his invention

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Pep v. Newsweek, Inc.

    553 F. Supp. 1000 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 5, 1983

    Yiamouyiannis v. Consumers Union, 619 F.2d 932, 940 (2d Cir.1980). … Newsweek’s argument that Pep and Brown, if interviewed, would have responded only with unhelpful, blank denials is speculation.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Kessler v. General Services Administration

    236 F. Supp. 693 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 27, 1964

    Angilly v. United States, 105 F.Supp. 257 (S.D. N.Y.1952), affirmed, 199 F.2d 642 (2d Cir. 1952); Green v. Baughman, 100 U. … Arant v. Lane, 249 U.S. 367 , 39 S.Ct. 293 , 63 L.Ed. 650 (1919); Drown v. Higley, 100 U.S.App.D.C. 326 , 244 F.2d 774 (1957).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Lloyd v. Oswald

    397 F. Supp. 882 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 7, 1974

    The action must be dismissed as to both defendants, who were sued in their capacities as chairman of the New York State Board of Parole and superintendent of Ossining Correctional Facility. … Pierson v. Ray, 386 U.S. 547, 557 , 87 S.Ct. 1213, 1219 , 18 L.Ed.2d 288 (1967). Plaintiff has made no claim that defendants have acted in bad faith.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Herbko International, Inc. v. Gemmy Industries Corp.

    916 F. Supp. 322 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 26, 1996

    ” game board and that Gemmy engaged in false advertising as well. … The prior art includes the Multiplay Magnetic Game Board, which is depicted in a black and white photocopy, and patents for two other game boards. (Dunne Deck, Exhibit A & B.)

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Von Herwarth v. Gristede Bros.

    20 F. Supp. 911 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 6, 1937

    Barney v. Latham, 103 U.S. 205 , 26 L.Ed. 514 ; Gainesville v. Brown-Crummer, 277 U.S. 54 , 48 S.Ct. 454 , 72 L.Ed. 781 . But is there a separable controversy between Gristede Bros., Inc., and Armour & Co. … Shainwald v. Lewis, 108 U.S. 158 , 2 S.Ct. 385 , 27 L.Ed. 691 ; Brooks v. Clark, 119 U.S. 502 , 7 S.Ct. 301 , 30 L.Ed. 482 ; Torrence v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.