Case law

Fertile Land, Ltd. v. Beame

445 F. Supp. 548 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 6, 1977

McCoy v. Jordan, 241 N.Y. 71, 77 , 148 N.E. 793, 794 (1925); Acme Realty Co. v. Schinasi, 215 N.Y. 495, 502 , 109 N.E. 577, 579 (1925); Deshong v. City of New York, 176 N.Y. 475, 483 , 68 N.E. 880, 882 (1903). … E. g., Opp Cotton Mills v. Administrator, 312 U.S. 126, 152-153 , 61 S.Ct. 524 , 85 L.Ed. 624 (1941); Madera v. Board of Education, 386 F.2d 778, 785 (2d Cir. 1967).

Osman v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.

584 F. Supp. 517 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 16, 1984

The Union represented plaintiff in a grievance proceeding contesting plaintiffs discharge before the Eastern Regional Field Board of Adjustments. … Welyczko v. U.S. Air, Inc., 733 F.2d 239 , No. 83-7976 (2d Cir. April 25, 1984). "See also Soso Laing Lo v. Pan American World Airways, Inc., 80 Civ. 428 (E.D.N.Y. Feb. 28, 1984); Solo v.

Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Milken

781 F. Supp. 226 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 19, 1991

Quoting Hanson v. … On the other hand, in S.E.C. v.

Carlucci v. United States

793 F. Supp. 482 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 16, 1992

Brown v. United States, 591 F.2d 1136, 1142 (5th Cir.1979). Plaintiff acknowledges that his attempt to seek contribution from the various third-party defendants in this action would be barred by this vast precedent. … See Foster v. Board of Trustees of Butler Cty. College, 771 F.Supp. 1118, 1122 (D.Kan.1991); Swift v. Levesque, 614 F.Supp. at 173 .

Standard Oil Co. v. United States

121 F. Supp. 770 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 14, 1952

Standard Oil Company of New Jersey v. United States, 267 U.S. 76 , 45 S.Ct. 211 , 69 L.Ed. 519 ; United States v. National Exchange Bank of Baltimore, 270 U.S. 527 , 46 S.Ct. 388 , 70 L.Ed. 717 ; Cooke v. … See, also, Townsend v. Crowdy, 8 C.B.N.S. 477; Strickland v. Turner, 7 Exch. 208.

The Napoleon

17 F. Cas. 1157 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 15, 1845

mate made the like an.swer to the same inquiry on Wednesday, the master not being on board; but Joyce says it was the master, and not the mate, who made that answer on "Wednesday. … Phelps v. Hartwell, 1 Mass. 71 ; Buckminster v. Perry, 4 Mass. 503 .

United States ex rel. Schlueter V. Watkins

67 F. Supp. 554 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 29, 1946

, the proceedings and rules adopted by such Board, the evidence adduced before said Board, the standards by which decisions were made by the said Board in connection with relator’s case, and the issuance of the removal order … Lockington v. Smith, 15 Fed.Cas., pages 758-761, No. 8,448; Ex parte Graber, D.C., 247 F. 882 -884; Minotto v. Bradley, D.C., 252 F. 600 -604.

In Re Doral Financial Corp. Securities Litigation

414 F. Supp. 2d 398 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 8, 2006

Doral, 05-cv-4087; Orchinik v. Doral, 05-cv-4098; Bernie v. Doral, 05-cv-4113; Vu v. Doral, 05-cv-4141; Faith v. Doral, 05-cv-4233; Borger v. Doral, 05-cv-4250; Lapat v. Doral, 05-cv-4294; Scheiner v. … See Simons v. Doral, 05-cv-4074; Bernie v. Doral, 05-cv-4113; Faith v. Doral, 05-cv-4233; Scheiner v. Doral, 05-CV-4413. 7 .

United States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters

992 F. Supp. 598 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 16, 1998

See United States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters; In re Charges Against Robert T. Simpson, 870 F.Supp. 557 (S.D.N.Y.1994). … See United States v. IBT, 19 F.3d 816 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 873 , 115 S.Ct. 199 , 130 L.Ed.2d 130 (1994).

Carey v. New York Gaslight Club, Inc.

458 F. Supp. 79 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 15, 1978

However while it appears that the pendency of related employment discrimination actions in both state and federal courts is now a sanctioned practice, see Voutis v. … Adverse determinations may be appealed to the New York State Human Rights Appeal Board (Appeal Board), id. § 297-a, and thereafter to the Appellate Division of the New York State Supreme Court and possibly the New York Court

Knudsen v. Lee & Simmons, Inc.

68 F. Supp. 538 · District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 7, 1946

He sometimes handles damaged cargo that has been down in the water, or which has been injured on board a ship. … So concluding, and believing, also, that the decisions in Anderson v. Manhattan Lighterage Corporation, 2 Cir., 148 F.2d 971 , and William Spencer & Son Corp. v.

Schultz v. Texaco Inc.

127 F. Supp. 2d 443 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 3, 2001

See, e.g., Tolle v. Carroll Touch, Inc., 977 F.2d 1129, 1138-41 (7th Cir.1992). See also Lightfoot v. Union Carbide Corp., 110 F.3d 898, 907-908 (2d Cir.1997); Hudson v. … See, e.g., Board of Regents University of State of New York v. Tomanio, 446 U.S. 478 -486, 100 S.Ct. 1790 , 64 L.Ed.2d 440 (1980); Hardin v. Straub, 490 U.S. 536 , 109 S.Ct. 1998 , 104 L.Ed.2d 582 (1989).

Ruta v. Delta Airlines, Inc.

322 F. Supp. 2d 391 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 2, 2004

Smith v. Comair, Inc., 134 F.3d 254, 259 (4th Cir.1998) (false imprisonment and IIED claims relating to boarding practices preempted); Travel All Over the World, Inc., v. … In Love v.

New York State Ass'n of Trial Lawyers v. Rockefeller

267 F. Supp. 148 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 31, 1967

Bryant v. Akron Metropolitan Park Dist., 281 U.S. 74 , 50 S.Ct. 228 , 74 L.Ed. 710 (1930); Mallett v. State of North Carolina, 181 U.S. 589, 597-599 , 21 S.Ct. 730 , 45 L. Ed. 1015 (1901); Brown v. … In Salsburg v.

United States v. Gonzalez

362 F. Supp. 415 · District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 15, 1973

In United States v. … People v. Brown, 24 N.Y.2d 421 , 301 N.Y.S.2d 18 , 248 N.E.2d 867 (1969), offers guidance on the relevance of area reputation.

The Sikh

175 F. 869 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 30, 1909

In support of this the learned author cites the two cases relied upon by ljbelants herein, viz.: Lishman v. Christie, 19 Q. B. D. 333, and Mediterranean, etc., S. S. Co. v. Mackay, 1 K. B. (1903) 297. … If this be the case, then the parties have agreed that the bill of lading should be conclusive evidence that the fSikh took on board at Kobe 29,641 rolls of matting, less 9 in dispute.

United States ex rel. Fong On v. Day

39 F.2d 202 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 17, 1930

Devenuto v. Curran (C. C. A.) 299 F. 206, 213 . … Chin Yow v. United States, 208 U. S. 8, 12, 13 , 28 S. Ct. 201 , 52 L. Ed. 369 .

Cerussi v. Union College

144 F. Supp. 2d 265 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 6, 2001

See Promuto v. Waste Mgmt. … See Clesi, 2001 WL 225241 , at *3 (citing Brown v. Dow Coming Corp., No. 93 Civ. 5510, 1996 WL 257614 , at. *2 (S.D.N.Y. May 15, 1996)). Thus, this factor also supports transfer. D.

Coe v. Town of Blooming Grove

567 F. Supp. 2d 543 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 7, 2008

V. … If the applicant demonstrates that a Town Board decision on appeal prior to the next regularly scheduled Town Board meeting is necessary due to the time-sensitive nature of the intended use or activity, then the Town Board

In re Gillespie

15 F. 734 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 17, 1883

Brown, J. The question involved in the rival claims to this dividend has been differently decided by high authorities. … J., in Hopkirk v. Page, 2 Brock. 20, 41 ; in Spain v. Hamilton’s Adm’r, 1 Wall. 604 ; and Nat. Bank v. Texas, 20 Wall. 72, 89 . In Judson v.