Case law

United States ex rel. Randazzo v. Follette

282 F. Supp. 2 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 26, 1968

Durocher v. LaVallee, 330 F.2d 303 , 305 n. 2 (2d Cir. 1964); United States ex rel. Smith v. Martin, 242 F.2d 701 (2d Cir. 1957); United States ex rel. Foreman v. Fay, 184 F.Supp. 535 (S.D.N.Y.1960). … Assuming that Massiah v.

Rawson v. Lyon

15 F. 831 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 15, 1883

Brown, J. There is no question that the ordinary practice in admiralty has long been to require a stipulation for costs from a respondent on entering his appearance and answering in an action in personam. … Clerke, Praxis, tits. 5, 11; Pharo v. Smith, 18 How. Pr. 47 .

Irving Trust Co. v. Deutsch

2 F. Supp. 971 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 9, 1932

Waivers by telegrams had been secured from-the absent members of the board.” V. A. It will be noted that the key to. the resolution passed' on April 3d, was that Mr. … Harris v. Morse (D. C.) 54 F. *992 (2d) 109, 115, but also by frustration of subject-matter, cf. Harris v. Morse (D. C.) 54 F.(2d) 109, 114 ; Harris v. Umsted, 79 Ark. 490 , 96 S. W. 146, 147 ; Commercial Bank v.

Wirtz v. American Guild of Variety Artists

267 F. Supp. 527 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 18, 1967

The decision of such Trial Board shall be deemed to be the decision of the National Board. … Wirtz v. Local 410, supra 366 F.2d at p. 443 . AGVA’s 1965 election of officers and board members is, therefore, declared void.

Eua Cogenex Corp. v. North Rockland Central School District

124 F. Supp. 2d 861 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 20, 2000

(citing Allen v. Board of Educ., 168 A.D.2d 403, 404 , 563 N.Y.S.2d 422 (N.Y.App.Div.1990).) … Bender v. New York City Health and Hospitals Corp., 38 N.Y.2d 662, 668 , 382 N.Y.S.2d 18 , 345 N.E.2d 561 (1976); Henry Boeckmann, Jr. & Assocs. v. Board of Education, 207 A.D.2d 773 , 616 N.Y.S.2d 395 (1994) (same).

Kaufman v. Cooper Companies, Inc.

719 F. Supp. 174 · District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 3, 1989

See Abdul Wali v. Coughlin, 754 F.2d 1015, 1025-26 (2d Cir.1985). I. … Singer, Chairman of the Board, at 115.

Reynolds v. New York State Department of Correctional Services

568 F. Supp. 747 · District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 19, 1983

Forts v. … Citing Carey v. New York State Human Rights Appeal Board, 61 A.D.2d 804 , 402 N.Y.

Vaher v. Town of Orangetown

133 F. Supp. 3d 574 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 23, 2015

Comm’rs v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 404 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997)). … Jeffes v. Barnes, 208 F.3d 49, 61 (2d Cir.2000) (quoting Jett v. Dallas Indep. Sch. Dist., 491 U.S. 701, 737 , 109 S.Ct. 2702 , 105 L.Ed.2d 598 (1989); Brown, 520 U.S. at 404 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 ).

National Union Fire Insurance v. R.H. Weber Exploration, Inc.

605 F. Supp. 1299 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 8, 1985

Corp. v. American Hosp. Supply Corp., No. 84 Civ. 3411, slip op. at 8-9 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 21, 1984). 4 . Schneider v. Sears, 265 F.Supp. 257, 263 (S.D.N.Y.1967) (footnote omitted). 5 . … Oil & Gas Ventures—First 1958 Fund, Ltd. v. Kung, 250 F.Supp. 744, 755 (S.D.N.Y.1966).

Geller v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.

717 F. Supp. 213 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 12, 1989

PLAINTIFFS’ ABILITY TO SATISFY PROOF REQUIREMENTS OF TORT While Florida case law formerly allowed recovery only for physical injury, the so-called impact rule has been modified through the dual cases of Brown v. … Brown, 468 So.2d at 904 .

Long Island Railroad v. Carfloats New York Central No. 25

182 F. Supp. 100 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 25, 1960

Thus a wind from the south would not only catch No. 66 broadside, but would play against 60 feet of free-board unprotected by any dock. … See Redman v. United States, 2 Cir., 1949, 176 F.2d 713 ; Schiavone-Bonomo Corp. v. Buffalo Barge Towing Corp., 2 Cir., 1945, 132 F.2d 766 ; Brown v. Kayler, 9 Cir., 1959, 273 F.2d 588, 589 ; Evans v.

Van Lier v. Dord

28 F. Cas. 1034 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 8, 1851

A part of the crew were on board the vessel, but it did not appear whether her cargo was discharged or not. … Reed v. Canfield [Case No. 11,641].

United States v. Miller

249 F. Supp. 59 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 16, 1965

Stromberg v. California, 283 U.S. 359 , 52 S.Ct. 532 , 75 L.Ed. 1117 (1931) or unreasonably compelled such speech (e. g. West Virginia State Board of Education v. … See West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette, supra, 319 U.S. at 639 , 63 S.Ct. 1178 ; Cantwell v. State of Connecticut, supra. To be sure, in the words of Mr. Justice Black in Giboney v.

Persaud

District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 31, 2026

BROWN, Defendants. … Becker v. Montgomery, 532 U.S. 757, 764 (2001).

Hanif v. Gantner

369 F. Supp. 2d 502 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 11, 2005

See, e.g., Yu v. … Ofosu v. McElroy, 98 F.3d 694, 699 (2d Cir.1996) (citing Michael v. INS, 48 F.3d 657, 664 (2d Cir.1995)).

Kurtin v. National RR Passenger Corp.(Amtrak)

887 F. Supp. 676 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 6, 1995

See Da Bolt v. … Board of Education, 647 F.Supp. at 1503 . 7 .

United States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters

870 F. Supp. 557 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 15, 1994

See Consent Decree at 23 ("The IBT shall pay all costs and expenses of the Independent Review Board and its staff (including all salaries of Review Board members and staff).”). 4 . … See United States v. International Bhd. of Teamsters, 964 F.2d 1308, 1312-13 (2d Cir.1992) ("reliable hearsay is admissible in IBT union disciplinary hearings”) (citing United States v.

Bowles v. W. T. Grant Co.

57 F. Supp. 773 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 28, 1944

Bowles v. Fischer & Co., 1 Price Control Cases 51,027; Bowles v. Tailored Silk Undergarment Co., 1 Price Control Cases 51,028; Brown v. Sacher, D.C., 53 F.Supp. 77 ; Brown v. … Cantor, 1 Price Control Cases 51,046; Brown v. Buchsbaum, 1 Price Control Cases 51,044; Brown v. Sonnenshein, 1 Price Control Cases 51,-037.

Walter v. The Kamchatker

29 F. Cas. 112 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 5, 1841

The libellant’s right to recover in this action rests exclusively on the services performed by him as a laborer on board the Kamchatker whilst lying at the wharf on the New Jersey side of the river. … Jones v. Davis [Case No. 7.4<!0], And, when rendered on board the ship, no objection would be allowed that it was not necessarily connected with the duties of a sailor.

Remington Rand, Inc. v. American Export Lines, Inc.

132 F. Supp. 129 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 11, 1955

Citing United States v. Nielson, 75 S.Ct. 654 ; Bisso v. Inland Waterways Corp., 75 S.Ct. 629 ; Boston Metals Co. v. The S. S. Winding Gulf, 75 S.Ct. 649 . Motions made in [Fair-deal Corp., Ltd. v. The Examiner], Nos. … Ad. 163-273 and [Omni Export Corp. v. The Examiner], A. 164-62 have been withdrawn, it appearing that in these suits the underwriters were not members of the Board of Underwriters.