Case law

Bernstein v. N. V. Nederlandsche-Amerikaansche Stoomvaart-Maatschappij

15 F.R.D. 37 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 14, 1953

It is urged upon me that Van Der Vorm’s positions as Chairman of the Board of Commisaris and Chairman of the Executive Committee of that Board give him a standing similar to that of an officer of an American corporation and … Kaufman’s conclusion in Campbell v.

Rockland Physician Associates, P.C. v. Grodin

616 F. Supp. 958 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 4, 1985

See also Dos Santos v. Columbus-CuneoCabrini Med. … Hosp. v. Dept. of Health, supra; Moss v. Albany Medical Ctr.

Park v. Hull of the Edgar Baxter

37 F. 219 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 30, 1888

Brown, J. … Rep. 919, 925; Nash v. Mosher, 19 Wend. 431 ; 3 Pars. Cont. (6th Ed.) 244; 2 Kent, Comm. 639. Both libels were, therefore, properly filed.

Doe v. Hagenbeck

98 F. Supp. 3d 672 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 13, 2015

The Alleged Facts Hagenbeck was West Point’s Superintendent between July 2006 and July 2010, and served as Chair of its Sexual Assault Review Board (the “Board”). … Muniz, 374 U.S. 150, 162 , 83 S.Ct. 1850 , 10 L.Ed.2d 805 (1963) (quoting U.S. v. Brown, 348 U.S. 110, 112 , 75 S.Ct. 141 , 99 L.Ed. 139 (1954))).

In Re Sunshine Mining Co. Securities Litigation

496 F. Supp. 9 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 25, 1979

In this multidistrict litigation, the defendants in two cases, Maris v. Sunshine Mining, and Stoiz v. … Kartub v. Optical Fashions (S.D.N.Y.1958) 158 F.Supp. 757 .

INDEPENDENCE PARTY OF RICHMOND COUNTY v. Graham

332 F. Supp. 2d 690 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 1, 2004

See, e.g., Tashjian v. Republican Party of Connecticut, 479 U.S. 208, 217 , 107 S.Ct. 544 , 93 L.Ed.2d 514 (1986); Democratic Party v. Wisconsin ex rel. … La Follette, 450 U.S. 107, 123 , 101 S.Ct. 1010 , 67 L.Ed.2d 82 (1981); State Comm. of the Independence Party v. Berman, 294 F.Supp.2d 518 (S.D.N.Y.2003).

Butterworth v. The Washington

4 F. Cas. 925 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 15, 1853

He was, when put on board, acting as one of the crew of the ship. The brig, when boarded, was from 1,000 to 1,200 miles from New York, and about the same distance from Norfolk. … Talbot v. Lace [Seeman] 1 Cranch [5 U. S.] 42; The Healy [Case No. 2,849]; The Henry Ewbank [Id. 6,376]. 3.

Clarvit v. J. G. White Engineering Corp.

7 F.R.D. 143 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 7, 1945

The third-party complaint in this case does not seek to hold Preload Company as a joint tort-feasor, but rather as an indemnitor on a remedy over; it is not, therefore, open to objection under Brown v. … Cranston v. Thompson, 319 U.S. 741 , 63 S.Ct. 1028 , 87 L.Ed. 1698 . See Tomko v. City Bank Farmers Trust Co., D.C., 3 F.R.D. 31 .

Nampiaparampil

District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 12, 2026

PAUL OETKEN, District Judge: Xavier Joseph Nampiaparampil, proceeding pro se, brings this action against the New York City Campaign Finance Board (the “Board” or “CFB”), the … Salveson v. JP Morgan Chase & Co., 663 F. App’x 71, 75 (2d Cir. 2016) (summary order) (quoting Shrader v. CSX Transp., Inc., 70 F.3d 255, 257 (2d Cir. 1995)).

In Re Doral Financial Corp. Securities Litigation

414 F. Supp. 2d 398 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 8, 2006

Doral, 05-cv-4087; Orchinik v. Doral, 05-cv-4098; Bernie v. Doral, 05-cv-4113; Vu v. Doral, 05-cv-4141; Faith v. Doral, 05-cv-4233; Borger v. Doral, 05-cv-4250; Lapat v. Doral, 05-cv-4294; Scheiner v. … See Simons v. Doral, 05-cv-4074; Bernie v. Doral, 05-cv-4113; Faith v. Doral, 05-cv-4233; Scheiner v. Doral, 05-CV-4413. 7 .

United States v. Maidman

340 F. Supp. 395 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 8, 1971

United States v. Federated Homes, Inc., 68 Cr. 574 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 24, 1969). … He is also required to remove all loose boards on the deck of the pier.

Clavin v. County of Orange

38 F. Supp. 3d 391 · District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 4, 2014

Local Law No. 8 of 2007 established qualifications for a Master Electrician’s License, set forth examination requirements, and empowered the Orange County Electrical Licensing Board (the “Board”) to review qualifications … Finally, plaintiff argues defendant “fail[ed] to supervise” the Board and failed to ensure that the Board “implements the Local Law as established.” (Id. ¶ 54).

Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Milken

781 F. Supp. 226 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 19, 1991

Quoting Hanson v. … On the other hand, in S.E.C. v.

United States v. Rao

318 F. Supp. 416 · District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 20, 1970

United States v. Rao, 394 F.2d 354 (2d Cir. 1968). . Rao v. United States, 393 U.S. 845 , 89 S.Ct. 129 , 21 L.Ed.2d 116 (1968). . United States v. Rao, 296 F.Supp. 1145 (S.D.N.Y.1969). . … See also United States v. Edwards, 366 F.2d 853, 874 (2d Cir. 1966), cert. denied sub nom. Jakob v. United States, 386 U.S. 908 , 87 S.Ct. 852 , 17 L.Ed.2d 782 (1967); Brown v.

United States v. Dovico

261 F. Supp. 862 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 16, 1966

In Donnelly v. … Ltd. v.

Adorno v. Correctional Services Corp.

312 F. Supp. 2d 505 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 30, 2004

See Deposition of Jack Brown, September 26, 2003 (“Brown Dep.”) (reproduced in part as Ex. A to Def. … Brown Dep. at 18-19.

Walker v. Dalsheim

669 F. Supp. 68 · District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 17, 1987

See also People v. Ramos, 63 N.Y.2d 640, 643 , 479 N.Y.S.2d 510, 512 , 468 N.E.2d 692 (1984); People v. Brown, 45 N.Y.2d 852 , 410 N.Y.S.2d 287 , 382 N.E.2d 1149 (1978); People v. … The New York Court of Appeals explained in People v. Brown, 45 N.Y.2d at 853-54, 410 N.Y.S.2d at 287 , 382 N.E.2d at 1149 -50: “Generally, the ineffectiveness of counsel is not demonstrable on the main record....

Seigal v. Merrick

422 F. Supp. 1213 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 11, 1976

Green v. Santa Fe Industries, Inc., 533 F.2d 1283 (2d Cir. 1976); Marshel v. AFW Fabric Corp. et al., 533 F.2d 1277 (2d Cir. 1975). … In Oil & Gas Ventures-First 1958 Fund, Ltd. v.

Kingsepp v. Wesleyan University

763 F. Supp. 22 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 2, 1991

In Mariash v. … Thus, Dartmouth maintains some of the attributes of a corporation, such as continuity of existence and the ability to sue and be sued, but is not incorporated in any state, does not issue stock, does not have a board of directors

Christiansen v. Omnicom Group, Inc.

167 F. Supp. 3d 598 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 9, 2016

(“Omnicom”); his former supervisor, Joe Cianciotto; and DDB executives Peter Hempel and Chris Brown (together, “Defendants”). … Brown v. Daikin Am, Inc., 756 F.3d 219, *609 226 (2d Cir.2014).