Case law

Sassower v. Field

138 F.R.D. 369 · District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 12, 1991

Bradley v. School Board of the City of Richmond, 416 U.S. 696 , 94 S.Ct. 2006 , 40 L.Ed.2d 476 (1974). … Chambers v. NASCO, Inc., — U.S.-, 111 S.Ct. 2123 , 115 L.Ed.2d 27 (1991). Indeed, in Chambers v.

Austrian v. Williams

103 F. Supp. 64 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 5, 1952

Co. v. … The new Board, just as the old Board, was one in name only and like the old Board supinely yielded its powers and duties to Williams.

Long Island Railroad v. Carfloats New York Central No. 25

182 F. Supp. 100 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 25, 1960

Thus a wind from the south would not only catch No. 66 broadside, but would play against 60 feet of free-board unprotected by any dock. … See Redman v. United States, 2 Cir., 1949, 176 F.2d 713 ; Schiavone-Bonomo Corp. v. Buffalo Barge Towing Corp., 2 Cir., 1945, 132 F.2d 766 ; Brown v. Kayler, 9 Cir., 1959, 273 F.2d 588, 589 ; Evans v.

Brabert Realty Co. v. 20125 Owners Corp.

703 F. Supp. 314 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 18, 1989

See 181 East 73rd Street Co. v. 181 East 73rd Tenants Corp., 87 Civ. 3362 (RO) (S.D.N.Y. … Plaintiff relies on King v. 415 Second Owners Corp., 86 Civ. 4800 (JMW), — F.Supp. -, (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 14, 1987), and Cromwell Associates v. Oliver Cromwell, Inc., 87 Civ. 784 (JMC) 705 F.Supp. 116 , (S.D.N.Y.

United States v. General Dynamics Corporation

258 F. Supp. 36 · District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 26, 1966

C. v. Consolidated Foods, 380 U.S. 592, 594 , 85 S.Ct. 1220 , 14 L.Ed.2d 95 (1965) and in Brown Shoe Co. v. … The Supreme Court stated in Brown Shoe Co. v.

Munch v. ABC-NABET Retirement Trust Plan

38 F. Supp. 2d 270 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 23, 1999

Plaintiff, Gladys Munch, brought this action against the Defendants, ABC-NA-BET Retirement Trust Plan (the “Plan”) and its Board of Trustees (the '“Board”), alleging that she is a designated beneficiary of a retirement trust … Plaintiff requested that the Board review the decision and the Board sustained its denial. Plaintiff thereafter filed a Complaint in New York State Supreme Court asserting four causes of action against Defendants.

The Indiana

13 F. Cas. 22 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 15, 1848

That the night was so thick and dark, that an object of the size and color of the schooner could not, without the aid of a light on board of her, be discovered by those on board of a steamboat running on the same track, at … St. 685, § 2; Thain v. The North America [Case No. 13,853]; Simpson v. Hand, 6 Wheat. 324 ; Bullock v. The Lamar [Case No. 2,129]; Waring v. Clarke, 5 How. [40 U. S.] 441.

Gonzalez v. Riverside & Fort Lee Ferry Co.

43 F. Supp. 366 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 24, 1942

On February 6 and May 18, 1940, he served as fireman on board one of the ferryboats. … Kraft v. A. H. Bull S. S. Co., D.C.S.D.N.Y.1939, 28 F.Supp. 437 ; Seneca Washed Gravel Corp. v. McManigal, 2 Cir., 1933, 65 F.2d 779 ; Hawn v. *368 American S. S. Co., 2 Cir., 1939, 107 F.2d 999 . See, also, Parker v.

Mescall v. Marra

49 F. Supp. 2d 365 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 11, 1999

As of February 18, 1997, Delgado’s anti-union behavior' was still being discussed at the Union Board meeting. … See Bd. of County Comm’rs. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 406-07 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997) (citing Canton v. Harris, 489 U.S. 378 , 109 S.Ct. 1197 , 103 L.Ed.2d 412 (1989)).

Kaplan v. Computer Sciences Corp.

148 F. Supp. 2d 318 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 27, 2001

Group v. Brown, 131 F.3d 120, 121, 122-23 (3rd Cir.1997). … Group v. Brown, 131 F.3d 120, 125-26 (3rd Cir.1997)(distinguishing the removed case from the case originally filed in federal court); Video Connection of America, Inc. v.

Gildersleeve v. New York, N. H. & H. R.

82 F. 763 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 24, 1897

Gilmore a board of engineers under the above resolution and act of congress, and the bridge was subsequently built under their supervision, upon plans'Mid drawings submitted to that board, approved by it, submitted to the … Packet Co. v. Keokuk & H. Bridge Co., 31 Fed. 755 ; Hannibal & St. J. R. Co. v. Missouri River Packet Co., 125 U. S. 260 , 8 Sup. Ct. 874.

Marquette Cement Manufacturing Co. v. Andreas

239 F. Supp. 962 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 7, 1965

From March 23, 1960 until February 3, 1961 Andreas served as Chairman of North American’s Board of Directors. … Blau v. Lehman, 173 F.Supp. 590 (S.D.N.Y.1959). There has not been sufficient evidence produced to show that Andreas was the deputy of the corporation on the Marquette Board.

Seeler v. Local 14, Bricklayers, Masons & Plasterers International Union

335 F. Supp. 335 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 3, 1971

Petitioner is the Regional Director of the Third Region of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). … NLRB v. Local 25, IBEW, 383 F.2d 449 (2d Cir. 1967).

United States v. Carbajal-Brand

991 F. Supp. 358 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 15, 1998

Texas v. Brown, 460 U.S. 730, 742 , 103 S.Ct. 1535 , 75 L.Ed.2d 502 (1983) (internal quotations omitted). … See Terry v.

Rivera v. Board of Education of the City School District of the City of New York

District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 18, 2021

See Binn v. Bernstein, No. 19 Civ. 6122 (GHW) (SLC), 2020 WL 4550312, at *34 (S.D.N.Y. … Aug. 6, 2020); see generally Gorman v. Covidien Sales, LLC, No. 13 Civ. 6486 (KPF), 2014 WL 7404071, at *2 (S.D.N.Y.

Mobil Oil Corp. v. Federal Trade Commission

406 F. Supp. 305 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 12, 1976

Ditlow v. Volpe, 362 F.Supp. 1321, 1324 (D.D.C.1973), citing Fisher v. Renegotiation Board, 153 U.S.App.D.C. 398 , 473 F.2d 109, 113 (1972); Getman v. … Exemption 5 Before the Supreme Court’s recent decisions in NLRB v. Sears, Roebuck, supra, and Renegotiation Board v.

Hogan & Hartson v. Butowsky

459 F. Supp. 796 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 24, 1978

Defendant cites Browning Debenture Holders’ Committee v. DASA, 560 F.2d 1078 (2d Cir. 1977) as support for his “bad faith” claim. … See: Bishop v. Wood, 426 U.S. 341 , 96 S.Ct. 2074 , 48 L.Ed.2d 684 (1976); Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972); Perry v.

Gordon v. Katz

934 F. Supp. 79 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 17, 1996

The Town Board rejected the budget proposed by Mr. … Ryan v. Burlington County, 889 F.2d 1286, 1290-91 , (3rd Cir.1989). The court in Drayton v.

Iavarone v. Raymond Keyes Associates, Inc.

733 F. Supp. 727 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 29, 1990

Keyes (“Keyes”) (Chairman of the Board of Directors of RKA), Kenneth McCurdy (President of RKA and a member of the Board of Directors), and six other members of the Board of Directors of RKA. … Id. at 975 (quoting Consolidated Brands, Inc. v. Mondi, 638 F.Supp. 152, 155 (E.D.N.Y.1986)); accord Kaplan v. Board of Education of the City of New York School *731 District, 759 F.2d 256, 259 (2d Cir.1985).

Hamilton v. Garlock, Inc.

115 F. Supp. 2d 437 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 29, 2000

See, Hamilton v. Garlock, Inc., 96 F.Supp.2d 352 (S.D.N.Y.2000). … Nat’l Ass’n v. Dew, 151 F.R.D. 237, 238 (S.D.N.Y.1993); East Coast Novelty Co. v. City of New York, 141 F.R.D. 245, 245 (S.D.N.Y.1992). .