Case law

The Vestris

53 F.2d 847 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 15, 1931

The one ease is Radcliffe v. Buckwell (1927) 2 K. B. 273. … See Atlee v. Packet Co., 21 Wall. 389 , 22 L. Ed. 619 ; Belden v. Chase, 150 U. S. 674 , 14 S. Ct. 264 , 37 L. Ed. 1218 .

Amida Capital Management II, LLC v. Cerberus Capital Management, L.P.

669 F. Supp. 2d 430 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 10, 2009

Lee Equity Fund V L.P. v. Mayer Brown Rowe & Maw LLP, 612 F.Supp.2d 267, 279 (S.D.N.Y.2009); In Re Refco, Inc. Sec. Litig., 609 F.Supp.2d 304 (S.D.N.Y.2009). … Partners, LLC v.

Daley v. Fitzsimmons

384 F. Supp. 637 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 12, 1974

These charges were filed with the Executive Board of Local 445 on July 31, 1974 at a meeting at which Refino was present and voting and the Board in pursuance of one of its by-laws, immediately upon the charge being filed … Vestal v. Hoffa, 451 F.2d 706 (6th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 934 , 92 S.Ct. 1768 , 32 L.Ed.2d 135 (1972).

United States ex rel. Chung Yuen Poy v. Corsi

2 F. Supp. 260 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 14, 1932

The Board of Special Inquiry which heard the ease at Ellis Island decided that the applicant’s story was untrue and excluded him. The Board of Review affirmed the order of exclusion. … Young Fat v. Nagle (C. C. A.) 3 F.(2d) 439 ; United States ex rel. Fong On v. Day, 54 F.(2d) 990 , in the Circuit Court of Appeals of this circuit; United States ex rel. Leo Ping v. Corsi.

Gammerman v. Bd. of Elections of City of New York

550 F. Supp. 1031 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 20, 1982

See, e.g., Carr v. New York State Board of Election, 40 N.Y.2d 556 , 388 N.Y.S.2d 87 , 356 N.E.2d 713 (1976); Tobin v. May, 72 A.D.2d 648 , 421 N.Y.S.2d 441 (3rd Dept. 1979); Seward v. … See, e.g., Lauer v. Board of Elections, 262 N.Y. 416 , 187 N.E. 561 (1933); Brackley v. Donohue, 2 A.D.2d 868, 156 N.Y.S.2d 133 (1956); Smith v.

Levin v. Mississippi River Corp.

59 F.R.D. 353 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 19, 1973

Since 1963 it has elected the Board of Directors of MoPac. … In end result, were the Court to retain jurisdiction, it would be required to function as MoPac’s sole director in place of its duly elected Board of Directors. Some objectors cite Dodge v.

Rawson v. Lyon

23 F. 107 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 28, 1885

Brown, J. … Cooper v. Schlesinger, 111 U. S. 148, 152, 155; S. C. 4 Sup. Ct. Rep. 360; Johnson v. Miln, 14 Wend. 195 ; Brown v. Tuttle, 66 Barb. 169 ; Thomas v. Beebe, 25 N. Y. 247 ; Bennett v. Judson, 21 N. Y. 238 ; French v.

Consolidated Laundries Corp. v. Craft

185 F. Supp. 631 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 18, 1960

These cases deal with situations where a state labor relations board, a state court or a state statute would thwart the broad purposes of the NLRA. … That section deals with unfair labor practices which are peculiarly within the ambit of the National Labor Relations Board. See San Diego Building Trades Council, etc. v.

Stahl v. State of NY

520 F. Supp. 221 · District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 19, 1981

Brown died during the pendency of the investigation. … Johnson v. Metz, 609 F.2d 1052, 1056 (2d Cir. 1979). 23 . People v.

United States ex rel. Deck v. Commissioner of Immigration & Naturalization

17 F. Supp. 78 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 31, 1936

Jew Lee v. Brough (D.C.) 16 F.(2d) 492 . 2. … See, for example, Tom Ung Chai v. Burnett (C.C.A.) 25 F.(2d) 574, 576 .

Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. City of New York

528 F. Supp. 1245 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 7, 1981

Plaintiffs are unable to cite any other local statutory authority mandating Board of Estimate review. While the significance of the FEIS cannot be denigrated, Andrus v. … Co. v. Alexander, 246 U.S. 276, 282 , 38 S.Ct. 237, 239 , 62 L.Ed. 713 (1918); Lowe v. Trans World Airlines, 396 F.Supp. 9, 11 (S.D.N.Y.1975).

United States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters

871 F. Supp. 178 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 7, 1994

Pursuant to the Rules and Procedures for Operation of the Independent Review Board for the International Brotherhood of Teamsters (“IRB Rules”), ¶ 0, the Independent Review Board (“IRB”) has made an application to this Court … See, e.g., Franklin County Employment and *180 Training Admin. v. Donovan, 707 F.2d 41, 44-45 (2d Cir.1983) (“all issues which a party contests on appeal must be raised at the appropriate time under agency practice”).

Barnan Associates v. 196 Owner's Corp.

797 F. Supp. 302 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 10, 1992

See, e.g., Ralis v. … Coliseum Park Apartments Co. v.

In re GLG Life Tech Corp. Securities Litigation

287 F.R.D. 262 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 9, 2012

See, e.g., Brown v. … See, e.g., Brown, 285 F.R.D. at 565-66 ; Arista Records LLC v. Media Servs. LLC, 2008 WL 563470 , at *1-2 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 25, 2008); RSM Production Corp. v. Fridman, 2007 WL 2295907 , at *1-3 (S.D.N.Y.2007); Ehrenfeld v.

One Hundred & Seventy-Five Tons of Coal

18 F. Cas. 706 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 15, 1878

Coombs v. Nolan [Case No. 3,189]. … Cross v. Beard, 26 N. Y. 85 ; Rodgers v. Forresters, 2 Camp. 483; Burmester v. Hodgson, Id. 488.

Bank Line Limited v. United States

68 F. Supp. 587 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 28, 1946

The Navy Board of Investigation in its hearing dealt with the circumstances connected with collisions between inbound and outbound vessels of a convoy. … As to the claim of privilege, I think Hickman v. Taylor, 3 Cir., 153 F.2d 212 , disposes of any such claim.

The Albert

1 F. Cas. 303 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 23, 1862

S. v. The Maria, [before cited.] It was instituted May 21, 1S62. … S. v. The Maria was allowed by the court to become, by invocation, evidence in the present .suit. That evidence, so brought into this case, shows that a Mr.

Avedis v. Herman

25 F. Supp. 2d 256 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 18, 1998

Cleveland Board v. Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532, 546 , 105 S.Ct. 1487 , 84 L.Ed.2d 494 (1985). … In Board of Governors v.

Nieves v. Thomas

256 F. Supp. 2d 169 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 26, 2003

See Parole Board Plearing Tr. at 2 (March 20, 2002). Nieves appeared before the New York State Parole Board (“Board”) for the first time on March 2, 2000. The Board denied parole. … Gonzalez v. Bennett, No. 00 Civ. 8401(VM), 2001 WL 1537553 at *4 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 30, 2001).

In Re CIS Corp.

142 B.R. 640 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 8, 1992

Coal Corp. v. … Reading Co. v. Brown is Inapposite The Appellant argues that the instant case qualifies as an exception to the requirement that the creditor confer a benefit on the debtor-in-possession, as provided in Reading Co. v.