Case law

The J. L. Bowen

13 F. Cas. 635 · District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 15, 1871

Williamson v. The Alphonso [Case No. 17,-749]; The Czarina [Id. 3,531]; The Roe, Swab. 84; The Janet Mitchell, Id. 111; The Golondrina, L. R. 1 Adm. & Ecc. 334; Jones, Salv. 14. … In the case of Williamson v.

Rawson v. Lyon

23 F. 107 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 28, 1885

Brown, J. … Cooper v. Schlesinger, 111 U. S. 148, 152, 155; S. C. 4 Sup. Ct. Rep. 360; Johnson v. Miln, 14 Wend. 195 ; Brown v. Tuttle, 66 Barb. 169 ; Thomas v. Beebe, 25 N. Y. 247 ; Bennett v. Judson, 21 N. Y. 238 ; French v.

Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. City of New York

528 F. Supp. 1245 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 7, 1981

Plaintiffs are unable to cite any other local statutory authority mandating Board of Estimate review. While the significance of the FEIS cannot be denigrated, Andrus v. … Co. v. Alexander, 246 U.S. 276, 282 , 38 S.Ct. 237, 239 , 62 L.Ed. 713 (1918); Lowe v. Trans World Airlines, 396 F.Supp. 9, 11 (S.D.N.Y.1975).

Allied Irish Banks, P.L.C. v. Bank of America, N.A.

252 F.R.D. 163 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 26, 2008

Members of the Global Board worked principally for their member firms, not the Global Board itself. Id. … The first consists of communications between Keeshan and the Global Board and Global Leadership team regarding AIB.

Lopez v. Eastern Airlines, Inc.

677 F. Supp. 181 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 12, 1988

Nader v. Allegheny Airlines, Inc., 626 F.2d 1031 (D.C.Cir.1980). … Therefore, under the theory set forth in Goranson v.

Chase v. Rieve

90 F. Supp. 184 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 14, 1950

Defendants are sued individually and as representatives of the members of the Executive Board of the CIO. … My attention has been called, informally, to the decision in Durkin v.

Westchester Lodge 2186 v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.

218 F. Supp. 187 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 16, 1963

Ferro v. Railway Express Agency, Inc., above, 296 F.2d at page 851 . … . § 153 , First, (i)) and is exclusively a matter for the Adjustment Board. Slocum v. Delaware L. & W. Ry. Co., 339 U.S. 239 , 70 S.Ct. 577 , 94 L.Ed. 795 (1950).

Consolidated Laundries Corp. v. Craft

185 F. Supp. 631 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 18, 1960

These cases deal with situations where a state labor relations board, a state court or a state statute would thwart the broad purposes of the NLRA. … That section deals with unfair labor practices which are peculiarly within the ambit of the National Labor Relations Board. See San Diego Building Trades Council, etc. v.

One Hundred & Seventy-Five Tons of Coal

18 F. Cas. 706 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 15, 1878

Coombs v. Nolan [Case No. 3,189]. … Cross v. Beard, 26 N. Y. 85 ; Rodgers v. Forresters, 2 Camp. 483; Burmester v. Hodgson, Id. 488.

The Albert

1 F. Cas. 303 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 23, 1862

S. v. The Maria, [before cited.] It was instituted May 21, 1S62. … S. v. The Maria was allowed by the court to become, by invocation, evidence in the present .suit. That evidence, so brought into this case, shows that a Mr.

United States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters

164 F. Supp. 2d 328 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 3, 2001

United States v. International Bhd. of Teamsters (“Simpson”), 120 F.3d 841, 346 (2d Cir.1997) (quoting United States v. … See United States v. International Bhd. of Teamsters (“Giacumbo”), 170 F.3d 136, 141 (2d Cir.1999).

Levine v. Biddle Sawyer Corporation

383 F. Supp. 618 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 4, 1974

Unlike the complaints in Popkin v. … Popkin v. Bishop, 464 F.2d at 719 .

African American Legal Defense Fund, Inc. v. New York State Department of Education

8 F. Supp. 2d 330 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 8, 1998

Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. Murgia, 427 U.S. 307, 312 , 96 S.Ct. 2562 , 49 L.Ed.2d 520 (1976) (emphasis supplied). 9 In San Antonio Independent School Dist. v. … In Papasan v.

Virtual Countries, Inc. v. Republic of South Africa

148 F. Supp. 2d 256 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 18, 2001

. §§ 1603 (a), (b); see Hansen v. Danish *263 Tourist Board, 147 F.Supp.2d 142, 148 (E.D.N.Y.2001); (Amend.Compl.¶ 8); (cf. Pl. Mem. at 1 n. 1) (asserting that SAT-OUR “has no identity apart from Republic”); Def. … Co. v. Braspetro Oil Servs.

United States Gypsum Co. v. Insurance Co. of North America

19 F. Supp. 767 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 1, 1937

Maslin v. Columbian Nat. Life Ins. Co., 3 F.Supp. 368 (D.C.N.Y.); Mayers v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Ins. Co., 11 F.Supp. 80 (D.C.N.Y.), affirmed (C.C.A.) 77 F.(2d) 1007 . … Shamrock Towing Co. v. American Ins. Co., 9 F.(2d) 57 (C.C.A.2).

United States v. Shakur

560 F. Supp. 350 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 30, 1983

Maxwell’s affidavit included information provided by Samuel Brown. In another opinion, I found Brown’s statements to the FBI were voluntary and well corroborated. … See Beck v. Ohio, 379 U.S. 89, 91 , 85 S.Ct. 223, 225 , 13 L.Ed.2d 142 (1964).

Austrian v. Williams

103 F. Supp. 64 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 5, 1952

Co. v. … The new Board, just as the old Board, was one in name only and like the old Board supinely yielded its powers and duties to Williams.

TZ Manor, LLC v. Daines

815 F. Supp. 2d 726 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 27, 2011

Cornett v. Brown, No. 04-CV-754, 2006 WL 845568 , at *16 (E.D.N.Y. … but also further evidence that the board was acting for impermissible reasons.

Yang v. Navigators Group, Inc.

18 F. Supp. 3d 519 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 8, 2014

Plaintiff then requested to attend the board’s finance committee meeting, because that committee discusses investment risks. … in front of the board.

Hamilton v. Guinan

199 F. Supp. 562 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 22, 1961

The Local Executive Board dismissed the plaintiff from office. Hamilton appealed to the International Executive Council, which affirmed the decision of the Local Board. … In Strauss v.