Case law

Berwecky v. Bear, Stearns & Co.

197 F.R.D. 65 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 18, 2000

Dura-Bilt Corp. v. Chase Manhattan Corp., 89 F.R.D. 87, 93 (S.D.N.Y.1981) (Edelstein, J.); accord Dietrich v. … See Degulis v. LXR Biotech., Inc., 176 F.R.D. 123 , 125 n. 1 (S.D.N.Y.1997); Reingold v. Deloitte Haskins & Sells, 599 F.Supp. 1241, 1263-64 (S.D.N.Y.1984); Freeman v.

Polak's Frutal Works, Inc. v. United States

176 F. Supp. 521 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 23, 1959

Welch v. Helvering, 1933, 290 U.S. 111 , 54 S.Ct. 8 , 78 L.Ed. 212 . … See Jones’ Estate v. Commissioner, 5 Cir., 1942, 127 F.2d 231 ; Imperial Type Metal Co. v. Commissioner, 3 Cir.,. 1939, 106 F.2d. 302 . Finally, there was no evidence to support the deduction for five years.

Vassell v. Reliance Security Group, PLC

322 F. Supp. 2d 459 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 18, 2004

Kikis, a then Command shareholder and Board Member, together with other minority shareholders and directors, filed a derivative action in the Supreme Court, New York County, entitled Rosan, et al. v. … See Rosan v. Vassell, 257 A.D.2d 436 , 683 N.Y.S.2d 516 (1st Dep’t 1999).

International Longshoremen's Ass'n v. Hellenic Lines, Ltd.

549 F. Supp. 435 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 27, 1982

In General Drivers, Warehousemen & Helpers et al. v. … See Rallen v. District 1199, National Union of Hospital and Health Care Employees, 574 F.2d 723 , 726 (2d Cir.1978); I/S Stavborg v. National Metal Converters, Inc., 500 F.2d 424 (2d Cir. 1974).

Acevedo v. Bookbinders & MacHine Operators Local No. 25 Edition Bookbinders of New York, Inc.

196 F. Supp. 308 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 16, 1961

Smith v. General Truck Drivers, etc., D.C., 181 F.Supp. 14 ; Sheridan v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners Local, supra; but see Johnson v. … It is further provided that “This Board and Branch shall be under the supervision of the Executive Board of Local No. 25.

United States ex rel. Lew Chung Jon v. Commissioner of Immigration

18 F. Supp. 641 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 12, 1937

In Johnson v. … Ng Kee Wong v. Corsi, 65 F.(2d) 564 , at page 565, said: “That the board of special inquiry was entitled to take into consideration its prior departmental records is not questioned, and could not be.”

Howell v. The Mary L. Peters

68 F. 919 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 25, 1895

BROWN. District Judge. The above libel was filed to recover for damages to bags of sugar upon a voyage from Sagua La Grande to New York in February and Alar eh, 1894. … Bohannon, 64 Fed. 883 ; Hubert v.

Harloff v. Barber & Co.

150 F. 185 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 7, 1907

Corsar v. J. D. Spreckels & Bros. Co., 141 Fed. 260, 264 , 72 C. C. A. 378 . She was therefore required to be provided with sufficient shifting boards to properly stow the cargo. … Dene Steam Shipping Co., Ltd., v. Tweedie Trading Co. (D. C.) 133 Fed. 589 ; Id. (C. C. A.) 143 Fed. 854 .

Seiden v. Price Waterhouse & Co.

327 F. Supp. 1325 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 19, 1971

Since one of the members is a partner of defendant, plaintiffs say that it is unlikely that any of the members of the Board would testify voluntarily. In Schneider v. … Plaintiffs cite Stull v. Baker, 311 F.Supp. 1205 (S.D.N.Y.1970); Gluck v. Vance, Sanders & Co., CCH Fed.Sec. L. Rep. ¶ 92,443 (S.D.N.Y.1969); Levin v.

Norte & Company v. Huffines

304 F. Supp. 1096 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 15, 1968

Deutsch, 73 F.2d 121, 125 (2d Cir. 1934); Austrian v. … See Ross v. Licht, 263 F.Supp. 395 (S.D.N.Y.1967); Hey v. Cummer, 89 Ohio App. 104 , 97 N.E.2d 702 (1950).

Rivera v. Feinstein

636 F. Supp. 159 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 28, 1986

Buzzard v. Local Lodge 104-0 Int'l. … In the landmark Rule 15 decision of Foman v.

Nannuzzi v. King

660 F. Supp. 1445 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 21, 1987

Brown v. Demco, Inc., 792 F.2d 478 (5th Cir.1986). Pursuant to the unanimous consent rule, the law requires that a removal petition set forth that “each of the defendants desires, and is eligible for, removal.” … Brown, 792 F.2d at 482 .

Gluck v. Agemian

495 F. Supp. 1209 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 16, 1980

See People v. … Judge Frankel’s reasoning in Stedman v.

Arco Management Corp. v. Bevona

215 F. Supp. 2d 407 · District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 9, 2002

The Office of the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, Civil Division, referred the Court’s request to the National Labor Relations Board (the “NLRB” or “Board”), and the Board filed a memorandum … The parties have submitted responses to the Board’s memorandum.

Direct Mail/Marketing Ass'n v. United States Postal Service

555 F. Supp. 816 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 21, 1983

See also Advertisers Distribution v. … Advertisers Distribution v. United States Postal Service, 526 F.Supp. 699, 702 (D.D.C.1981), aff'd, Newsweek, supra; Direct Mail Marketing Association v.

Allied Irish Banks, P.L.C. v. Bank of America, N.A.

252 F.R.D. 163 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 26, 2008

Members of the Global Board worked principally for their member firms, not the Global Board itself. Id. … The first consists of communications between Keeshan and the Global Board and Global Leadership team regarding AIB.

Benjamin v. Malcolm

495 F. Supp. 1357 · District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 27, 1980

Arkansas Board of Correction, 505 F.2d 194, 201 (8th Cir. 1974); Gates v. Collier, 501 F.2d 1291, 1319-20 (5th Cir. 1974); Rozecki v. Gaughan, 459 F.2d 6, 8 (1st Cir. 1972); Jackson v. … Rhem v. Malcolm, 507 F.2d 333, 342 (2d Cir. 1974). *1364 III In Bell v.

United States v. Camacho

674 F. Supp. 118 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 16, 1987

For instance, in United States v. … Texas v.

Douds v. Associated Musicians of Greater New York, Local 802

123 F. Supp. 798 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 27, 1954

Second Region of the Board, an agency of the United States, and filed the petition herein for and on behalf of the Board. 2. … Western Inc., 93 N.L.R.B. 336 ; Washington Coca Cola Bottling Works, Inc., 107 N.L.R.B. 104 ; Elliott v. General Drivers, etc., D.C.S.D.

International News Service v. Gereczy

160 F. Supp. 5 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 12, 1958

In view of these facts the company had submitted to the Board of Arbitration, and contended in its motion in the Supreme Court, that the board did not have jurisdiction to hear the controversy because of Article 84, § 1448 … Textile Workers Union of America v.