Case law

Goodall v. Columbia Ventures, Inc.

374 F. Supp. 1324 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 29, 1974

The complaint alleges that plaintiff has been injured by two transactions allegedly engineered by Columbia, through lts control of a majority of the Chem Seps’ board of directors, including the individual defendants. … Brown v. Bullock, 294 F.2d 415 (2d Cir. 1961) (enbanc). 10 . See 15 U.S.C. § 80a-l(b) ; General Time Corp. v. American Investors Fund, Inc., 283 F.Supp. 400 (S.D.N.Y.1968). 11 . Independent Investor Protective League v.

Caleb & Co. v. E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.

615 F. Supp. 96 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 26, 1985

In Lafountain & Woolson Co. v. Brown, 91 Vt. 340 , 101 A. 36, 37 (1917), the court explained that “[t]he principle of equitable assignments applies. … In Bryan v.

The Limon

14 F.2d 153 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 15, 1926

Learning of the presence of the aliens, he directed the master to detain them on board the ship. … Lum Young v. Stump, 292 E. 354. Admittedly there is language in the opinion of a majority of the court that would indicate this to be the fact.

Kulberg Finances Inc. v. Spark Trading D.M.C.C.

628 F. Supp. 2d 510 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 18, 2009

See Exh. 1 to the Declaration of Robert Andrew Jardine-Brown (“Jardine-Brown Deck”) (Contract # 532.080830). … Jar-dine-Brown Decl. ¶ 13.

Gluck v. Agemian

495 F. Supp. 1209 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 16, 1980

See People v. … Judge Frankel’s reasoning in Stedman v.

United States v. Adler

274 F. Supp. 2d 583 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 31, 2003

Thereafter, a divided panel of our Court of Appeals in United States v. … Handakas was also distinguished by the Court of Appeals in United States v.

Lark v. Lacy

43 F. Supp. 2d 449 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 15, 1999

Bartlett v. New York State Board of Law Examiners, 156 F.3d 321, 327 (2d Cir.1998) (quotation marks omitted). … ‘was not intended to create a duty without enabling legislation but only to state a general principle’ ”) (quoting Brown v. State, 89 N.Y.2d 172 , 652 N.Y.S.2d 223 , 674 N.E.2d 1129 (1996)). As to Ms.

Direct Mail/Marketing Ass'n v. United States Postal Service

555 F. Supp. 816 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 21, 1983

See also Advertisers Distribution v. … Advertisers Distribution v. United States Postal Service, 526 F.Supp. 699, 702 (D.D.C.1981), aff'd, Newsweek, supra; Direct Mail Marketing Association v.

Camacho v. Rogers

199 F. Supp. 155 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 19, 1961

Hamilton, D.C.M.D.Pa.1939, 29 F.Supp. 693 ; England v. Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners, D.C. E.D.La.1961, 194 F.Supp. 521 . … Lassiter v. Northampton Co. Board of Elections, supra; Trudeau v. Barnes, supra.

United States v. Cruikshank

48 F.2d 352 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 23, 1931

Dollar Savings Banks v. United States, 19 Wall. 227 , 22 L. Ed. 80 ; United States v. Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. (C. C. A.) 249 F. 678 ; United States v. Ayer, supra. … , until the decision of the board has beeome final.”

Ringgold v. United States

420 F. Supp. 698 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 2, 1976

See, e. g., Dunmar v. Ailes, 121 U.S.App.D.C. 45 , 348 F.2d 51 (1965); Andrews v. … Friedberg v. Resor, 453 F.2d 935, 937 (2d Cir. 1971). 5 . See the discussion in Andrews v. Knowlton, 509 F.2d 898 ; and Gaines v. Hoffman, 75 Civ. 5120 (S.D.N.Y.

Ng Fun Yin v. Esperdy

187 F. Supp. 51 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 25, 1960

The Board of Immigration Appeals reversed the District Director. … National Labor Relations Board v. Hearst Publications, Inc., 1944, 322 U.S. 111, 130-132 , 64 S.Ct. 851 , 88 L.Ed. 1170 . I will assume this principle applicable to the case at bar.

Crown v. Trustees of the Patrolmen's Variable Supplements Fund

659 F. Supp. 318 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 15, 1987

Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). Where plaintiffs make out such a property right, a state cannot deprive them of this property without due process. … Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532 , 105 S.Ct. 1487, 1491 , 84 L.Ed.2d *320 494 (1985); Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. at 577 , 92 S.Ct. at 2709 . See also Paul v.

Carl Zeiss Stiftung v. V.E.B. Carl Zeiss, Jena

298 F. Supp. 1309 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 12, 1969

Deacon Brown Bottling Co., 200 F. 105 (N.D.Ala.1912); Weyman-Burton Co. v. Old Indian Snuff Mills, 197 F. 1015 (S.D.N.Y.1912); Independent Baking Powder Co. v. Boorman, 130 F. 726 (D.N.J.1904). … Y. has been a member of the Board of Management of the Stiftung, and two others were formerly employed by it, Zeiss, N.

Sperry Rand Corp. v. Bell Telephone Laboratories, Inc.

171 F. Supp. 343 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 19, 1959

In Prahl v. … Shell Development Co. v.

Phillips v. Reed Group, Ltd.

955 F. Supp. 2d 201 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 1, 2013

More specifically, according to Plaintiff, the LLC “held Board meetings ..., published Board minutes ..., exhibited ownership of the MDA ..., entered into contracts, solicited business, [and] held and disposed of assets.” … Andy Stroud, Inc. v. Brown, 08 Civ. 8246(HB), 2009 WL 539863 , at *1, n. 2, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18725 , at *2, n. 2 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 4, 2009). The court need not hold an evidentiary hearing to decide the motion.

United States v. United States Alkali Export Ass'n, Inc.

7 F.R.D. 256 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 7, 1946

Callen v. Pennsylvania R. Co., D.C.E.D. Pa. 1946, 5 F.R.D. 83, 84 ; Hillside Amusement Co. v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc., S.D.N.Y., 1944, 7 F.R.D 260; Stewart-Warner Corp. v. … See Brown v. United States, 1928, 276 U.S. 134, 143 , 48 S.Ct. 288 , 72 L.Ed. 500 * * *; Consolidated Rendering Co. v. Vermont, 1908, 207 U.S. 541, 553, 554 , 28 S.Ct. 178 , 52 L.Ed. 327 , 12 Ann.Cas. 658 * * * ”.

Commer v. District Council 37, Local 375

990 F. Supp. 311 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 13, 1998

See Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 236 , 94 S.Ct. 1683 , 40 L.Ed.2d 90 (1974); Atlantic Mutual Ins. Co. v. Balfour Maclaine Int’l Ltd., 968 F.2d 196, 198 (2d Cir.1992); Rubin v. … McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp., 298 U.S. 178, 189 , 56 S.Ct. 780 , 80 L.Ed. 1135 (1936); see also Board of Educ. of the Mount Sinai Union Free Sch. Dist. v.

Morse Dry Dock & Repair Co. v. Munson S. S. Line

155 F. 150 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 6, 1907

Spellman v. Muehlfeld, 166 N. Y. 245 , 59 N. E. 317 . The admission of the testimony seems to have been correct. Mr. … Justice Story in his work on Equity Jurisprudence (v. 1, p. 544) as follows: “526.

Jacobi v. Bache & Co., Inc.

377 F. Supp. 86 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 3, 1974

In Silver v. … Ass’n. v. United States, 268 U.S. 563 , 45 S.Ct. 578 , 69 L.Ed. 1093 (1925); Cement Mfrs. Protective Ass’n. v. United States, 268 U.S. 588 , 45 S.Ct. 586 , 69 L.Ed. 1104 (1925); Chicago Board of Trade, supra.