Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.23s
Railway Labor Executives' Ass'n v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad
759 F. Supp. 1019 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 26, 1990
Local 553, Transport Workers Union v. Eastern Air Lines, 695 F.2d 668, 675 (2d Cir.1982). The sole purpose of a minor-dispute injunction is to preserve the jurisdiction of the adjustment board. … board could give no “significant remedy” without it).
Cited 5 timesPublishedT.E. v. Pine Bush Central School District
58 F. Supp. 3d 332 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 4, 2014
Doe v. … Gant v.
Abrogated on other grounds by Agosto v. New York City Department of Education, 982 F.3d 86 (2020)Cited 21 timesPublishedAssociation of Data Processing Services Organizations, Inc. v. Citibank, N.A.
508 F. Supp. 91 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 15, 1980
The Noerr-Pennington doctrine was extended to the adjudicative process in California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking Unlimited, 404 U.S. 508 , 92 S.Ct. 609 , 30 L.Ed.2d 642 (1972). … See Franchise Realty Interstate Corp. v. San Francisco Local Joint Executive Board, 542 F.2d 1076, 1082-83 (9th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 940 , 97 S.Ct. 1571 , 51 L.Ed.2d 787 (1977).
Cited 3 timesPublishedNew York City Managerial Employees Ass'n v. Dinkins
807 F. Supp. 958 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 29, 1992
Hodel v. Indiana, 452 U.S. 314, 331-32 , 101 S.Ct. 2376, 2387 , 69 L.Ed.2d 40 (1981); see also Brown v. … Co. v. State Bd. of Equalization, 451 U.S. at 670 , 101 S.Ct. at 2084 ; see also Brown v.
Cited 10 timesPublishedGulf & Western Industries, Inc. v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
356 F. Supp. 1066 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 13, 1973
the Board and of the corporation. … The law of this Circuit is, as enunciated in Hamilton Watch Co. v.
Cited 33 timesPublishedPhilippine Sugar Centrals Agency v. Mitsui Bussan Kaisha, Ltd.
14 F. Supp. 1010 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 19, 1936
Clark v. Barnwell, 12 How. 272 , 13 L.Ed. 985 ; Rich v. Lambert, 12 How. 347 , 13 L.Ed. 1017 . The carrier has explained the damage sufficiently to bring it within exceptions in the bills of lading. … These cases are not like Jahn v. The Folmina, 212 U.S. 354 , 29 S.Ct. 363 , 53 L.Ed. 546 , 15 Ann.Cas. 748, The Rosalia, 264 F. 285 (C.C.A.2), Stiles v. Ocean S. S. Co., 34 F.(2d) 627 (C.C.A.2), and The Joseph J.
Cited 2 timesPublishedKientzler v. Sun Line Greece Special Shipping Co.
779 F. Supp. 342 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 18, 1991
Co. v. … Plaintiff maintains that she boarded the ship by means of a photo identification card issued in Rio de Janeiro, but Defendants assert that such cards are prepared on board the ship after a passenger has boarded the ship.
Cited 14 timesPublishedLeo Feist, Inc. v. Apollo Records, N. Y. Corp.
300 F. Supp. 32 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 27, 1969
Ricordi & Co. v. … In Reeve Music Co. v.
Cited 9 timesPublished8 F. Cas. 708 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 15, 1879
and damage were not caused by perils of the sea” but by the “carelessness, unskillfulness and wrongful acts of the master, officers and seamen of the vessel” and “by defective dunnage, stowage and improper handling and v* … The hogsheads were not damaged. • The vessel had a centre-board, and the damaged bags and boxes were found adjoining to or near the trunk of this centre-board, which rose about nine feet high in the hold.
Cited 0 timesPublished691 F. Supp. 651 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 28, 1988
Alfaro Motors, Inc. v. Ward, 814 F.2d 883, 888 (2d Cir.1987), citing Parratt v. Taylor, 451 U.S. 527, 543-44 , 101 S.Ct. 1908, 1916-17 , 68 L.Ed.2d 420 (1981), overruled on other grounds, Daniels v. … As Judge Friendly wrote in Utica Mutual Insurance Co. v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedDanielson v. LOCAL 814, INTERNAT'L BRO. OF TEAMSTERS, ETC.
355 F. Supp. 1293 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 16, 1973
355 F.Supp. 1293 (1973) Sidney DANIELSON, Regional Director, Region 2 of the National Labor Relations Board, For and on Behalf of the NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. … We have interpreted that requirement to mean that there must be a "reasonable possibility" that the unfair labor practice charge will be sustained by the Board. National Maritime U. of Amer. v.
Cited 0 timesPublished151 F. Supp. 3d 363 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 10, 2015
Board of County Commissioners v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 404 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 . … Brown, 520 U.S. at 407 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 .
Cited 4 timesPublishedIn Re Corning, Inc. Securities Litigation
349 F. Supp. 2d 698 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 22, 2004
Wheat v. Hall, 535 F.2d 874, 876 (5th Cir.1976); John R. Lewis, Inc. v. Newman, 446 F.2d 800, 804 (5th Cir.1971). … Boguslavsky v. Kaplan, 159 F.3d 715, 720 (2d Cir.1998); Dietrich v. Bauer, 126 F.Supp.2d 759, 764 (S.D.N.Y.2001).
Cited 7 timesPublishedSpang v. Katonah-Lewisboro Union Free School District
626 F. Supp. 2d 389 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 18, 2009
(citing Brandt v. Board of Coop. Educ. Servs., 820 F.2d 41 , 45 (2d Cir.1987))). … Board of Educ. of Arlington Cent. Sch. Dist. v.
Cited 12 timesPublishedDGM Investments, Inc. v. New York Futures Exchange, Inc.
265 F. Supp. 2d 254 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 27, 2003
Sam Wong & Son, Inc. v. … Movement, Inc. v.
Cited 14 timesPublished606 F. Supp. 2d 473 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 31, 2009
Prior to and during the class period, Perseus-Soros exercised control over Bioenvision’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) and the company itself. (Id.) … See TSC Industries, Inc. v.
Cited 14 timesPublished992 F. Supp. 2d 263 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 16, 2014
Ruiz v. … Section V of the Injunction requires Apple to hire an ACO who will report to the Board’s Audit Committee and be responsible for supervising Apple’s antitrust compliance efforts. .
Cited 4 timesPublishedErickson v. New York Law School
585 F. Supp. 209 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 25, 1984
Beal v. Lindsay, 468 F.2d 287, 291 (2d Cir.1972). … See Hodgson v. Behrens Drug Co., 475 F.2d 1041, 1050 (5th Cir.1973); see also Soler v. G & U, Inc., 86 F.R.D. 524, 528 (S.D.N.Y.1980).
Cited 8 timesPublished105 F. Supp. 32 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 22, 1952
Ling Yee Suey, v. Spar, 2 Cir., 149 F.2d 881 . The disposition of excluded aliens, such as relator, is governed by Title 8 U.S.C.A. § 154 . … Mezei v. Shaughnessy, 2 Cir., 195 F.2d 964 , where it was suggested that the six month limitation upon the confinement
Cited 6 timesPublishedEL Bruce Company v. Empire Millwork Corporation
164 F. Supp. 446 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 30, 1958
The case of American Crystal Sugar Company v. … See American Crystal Sugar Company v.
Cited 2 timesPublished
Ask Donna