Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnysd

10,000+ results

1.23s

  • Railway Labor Executives' Ass'n v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad

    759 F. Supp. 1019 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 26, 1990

    Local 553, Transport Workers Union v. Eastern Air Lines, 695 F.2d 668, 675 (2d Cir.1982). The sole purpose of a minor-dispute injunction is to preserve the jurisdiction of the adjustment board. … board could give no “significant remedy” without it).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • T.E. v. Pine Bush Central School District

    58 F. Supp. 3d 332 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 4, 2014

    Doe v. … Gant v.

    Abrogated on other grounds by Agosto v. New York City Department of Education, 982 F.3d 86 (2020)Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Association of Data Processing Services Organizations, Inc. v. Citibank, N.A.

    508 F. Supp. 91 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 15, 1980

    The Noerr-Pennington doctrine was extended to the adjudicative process in California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking Unlimited, 404 U.S. 508 , 92 S.Ct. 609 , 30 L.Ed.2d 642 (1972). … See Franchise Realty Interstate Corp. v. San Francisco Local Joint Executive Board, 542 F.2d 1076, 1082-83 (9th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 940 , 97 S.Ct. 1571 , 51 L.Ed.2d 787 (1977).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • New York City Managerial Employees Ass'n v. Dinkins

    807 F. Supp. 958 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 29, 1992

    Hodel v. Indiana, 452 U.S. 314, 331-32 , 101 S.Ct. 2376, 2387 , 69 L.Ed.2d 40 (1981); see also Brown v. … Co. v. State Bd. of Equalization, 451 U.S. at 670 , 101 S.Ct. at 2084 ; see also Brown v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Gulf & Western Industries, Inc. v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

    356 F. Supp. 1066 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 13, 1973

    the Board and of the corporation. … The law of this Circuit is, as enunciated in Hamilton Watch Co. v.

    Cited 33 timesPublished
  • Philippine Sugar Centrals Agency v. Mitsui Bussan Kaisha, Ltd.

    14 F. Supp. 1010 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 19, 1936

    Clark v. Barnwell, 12 How. 272 , 13 L.Ed. 985 ; Rich v. Lambert, 12 How. 347 , 13 L.Ed. 1017 . The carrier has explained the damage sufficiently to bring it within exceptions in the bills of lading. … These cases are not like Jahn v. The Folmina, 212 U.S. 354 , 29 S.Ct. 363 , 53 L.Ed. 546 , 15 Ann.Cas. 748, The Rosalia, 264 F. 285 (C.C.A.2), Stiles v. Ocean S. S. Co., 34 F.(2d) 627 (C.C.A.2), and The Joseph J.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Kientzler v. Sun Line Greece Special Shipping Co.

    779 F. Supp. 342 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 18, 1991

    Co. v. … Plaintiff maintains that she boarded the ship by means of a photo identification card issued in Rio de Janeiro, but Defendants assert that such cards are prepared on board the ship after a passenger has boarded the ship.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Leo Feist, Inc. v. Apollo Records, N. Y. Corp.

    300 F. Supp. 32 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 27, 1969

    Ricordi & Co. v. … In Reeve Music Co. v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Endicott v. Renauld

    8 F. Cas. 708 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 15, 1879

    and damage were not caused by perils of the sea” but by the “carelessness, unskillfulness and wrongful acts of the master, officers and seamen of the vessel” and “by defective dunnage, stowage and improper handling and v* … The hogsheads were not damaged. • The vessel had a centre-board, and the damaged bags and boxes were found adjoining to or near the trunk of this centre-board, which rose about nine feet high in the hold.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Blake v. Ambach

    691 F. Supp. 651 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 28, 1988

    Alfaro Motors, Inc. v. Ward, 814 F.2d 883, 888 (2d Cir.1987), citing Parratt v. Taylor, 451 U.S. 527, 543-44 , 101 S.Ct. 1908, 1916-17 , 68 L.Ed.2d 420 (1981), overruled on other grounds, Daniels v. … As Judge Friendly wrote in Utica Mutual Insurance Co. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Danielson v. LOCAL 814, INTERNAT'L BRO. OF TEAMSTERS, ETC.

    355 F. Supp. 1293 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 16, 1973

    355 F.Supp. 1293 (1973) Sidney DANIELSON, Regional Director, Region 2 of the National Labor Relations Board, For and on Behalf of the NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. … We have interpreted that requirement to mean that there must be a "reasonable possibility" that the unfair labor practice charge will be sustained by the Board. National Maritime U. of Amer. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Barboza v. D'Agata

    151 F. Supp. 3d 363 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 10, 2015

    Board of County Commissioners v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 404 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 . … Brown, 520 U.S. at 407 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • In Re Corning, Inc. Securities Litigation

    349 F. Supp. 2d 698 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 22, 2004

    Wheat v. Hall, 535 F.2d 874, 876 (5th Cir.1976); John R. Lewis, Inc. v. Newman, 446 F.2d 800, 804 (5th Cir.1971). … Boguslavsky v. Kaplan, 159 F.3d 715, 720 (2d Cir.1998); Dietrich v. Bauer, 126 F.Supp.2d 759, 764 (S.D.N.Y.2001).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Spang v. Katonah-Lewisboro Union Free School District

    626 F. Supp. 2d 389 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 18, 2009

    (citing Brandt v. Board of Coop. Educ. Servs., 820 F.2d 41 , 45 (2d Cir.1987))). … Board of Educ. of Arlington Cent. Sch. Dist. v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • DGM Investments, Inc. v. New York Futures Exchange, Inc.

    265 F. Supp. 2d 254 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 27, 2003

    Sam Wong & Son, Inc. v. … Movement, Inc. v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Vladimir v. Bioenvision Inc.

    606 F. Supp. 2d 473 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 31, 2009

    Prior to and during the class period, Perseus-Soros exercised control over Bioenvision’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) and the company itself. (Id.) … See TSC Industries, Inc. v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • United States v. Apple Inc.

    992 F. Supp. 2d 263 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 16, 2014

    Ruiz v. … Section V of the Injunction requires Apple to hire an ACO who will report to the Board’s Audit Committee and be responsible for supervising Apple’s antitrust compliance efforts. .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Erickson v. New York Law School

    585 F. Supp. 209 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 25, 1984

    Beal v. Lindsay, 468 F.2d 287, 291 (2d Cir.1972). … See Hodgson v. Behrens Drug Co., 475 F.2d 1041, 1050 (5th Cir.1973); see also Soler v. G & U, Inc., 86 F.R.D. 524, 528 (S.D.N.Y.1980).

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • United States Ex Rel. Camezon v. District Director of Immigration & Naturalization at Port of New York

    105 F. Supp. 32 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 22, 1952

    Ling Yee Suey, v. Spar, 2 Cir., 149 F.2d 881 . The disposition of excluded aliens, such as relator, is governed by Title 8 U.S.C.A. § 154 . … Mezei v. Shaughnessy, 2 Cir., 195 F.2d 964 , where it was suggested that the six month limitation upon the confinement

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • EL Bruce Company v. Empire Millwork Corporation

    164 F. Supp. 446 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 30, 1958

    The case of American Crystal Sugar Company v. … See American Crystal Sugar Company v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.