Case law

Klamberg v. Roth

473 F. Supp. 544 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 22, 1979

May 9, 1979); Valente v. Pepsico, Inc., 454 F.Supp. 1228, 1253-54 (D.Del.1978); Goldberger v. Baker, 442 F.Supp. 659, 664-65 (S.D.N.Y.1977); see Browning Debenture Holders' Committee v. … Any Committeeman may be removed from such office by vote of the Board of Directors, for any cause or without specified cause, and without hearing, provided that the Board of Directors shall give written notice of such removal

Teledyne Industries, Inc. v. Eon Corporation

401 F. Supp. 729 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 29, 1975

Klaxon Co. v. … All of these elements must be present before fraud can be found and the plaintiff bears the burden of proving each and every element by a fair preponderance of the evidence. 7 Sierra National Bank v. Brown (1st Dist.Ct.

United States v. Gernie

228 F. Supp. 329 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 8, 1964

Tomasello v. Smith and United States v. … His draft board had a record of his address there. The Probation Department had been in communication with his draft board concerning him during the probation period.

In re The Boskenna Bay

31 F. 612 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 22, 1887

Brown, J. … A comparison of the libelant’s fruit with other fruit of quite different marks and brands on board the Boskenna Bay, and with other sales of fruit similar to the latter class, assumes that damage to the whole fruit on the

Campbell v. City of New York

101 F. Supp. 2d 248 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 27, 2000

See Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 569-70 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972); Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532, 538 , 105 S.Ct. 1487 , 84 L.Ed.2d 494 (1985). … See Lombard v. Board of Ed. of City of New York, 502 F.2d 631, 637 (2d. Cir.1974).

Allah v. Henderson

526 F. Supp. 282 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 23, 1981

Boodie v. … See People v. Brown, 45 N.Y.2d [852] 854, 410 N.Y.S.2d 287 , 382 N.E.2d 1149 (1978) .” 72 A.D.2d 503 , 420 N.Y.S.2d 526 (1979) . In People v.

Tasadfoy v. Ruggiero

365 F. Supp. 2d 542 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 14, 2005

Shumway v. United Parcel Service, Inc., 118 F.3d 60 (2d Cir.1997). … Graham v. Long Island R.R., 230 F.3d 34, 40 (2d Cir.2000).

Fineman v. United States Postal Service

555 F. Supp. 1336 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 3, 1983

Penna v. United States Army, Corps of Engineers, 490 F.Supp. 442, 443 (S.D.N.Y.1980). . Mizerak v. Adams, 682 F.2d 374, 376 (2d Cir.1982); McTiernan v. Gronouski, 337 F.2d 31, 34 (2d Cir.1964); Penna v. … Merit Systems Protection Board, 686 F.2d 844, 849 (10th Cir.1982); Phillips v. Bergland, 586 F.2d 1007, 1012 (4th Cir.1978); Boyce v. United States, 543 F.2d 1290, 1292 , 211 Ct.Cl. 57 (1976) (and cases cited therein).

Rosario v. New York Times Co.

84 F.R.D. 626 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 27, 1979

A number of courts have distinguished Rodriguez in continuing to apply the “across-the-board” concept. In Arnett v. … The “across-the-board” concept relies on a nexus between the class members. Rodriguez found lack of merit after trial of the individual claims presented. Nexus was clearly absent. In Satterwhite v.

Custer Channel Wing Corporation v. Frazer

181 F. Supp. 197 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 9, 1959

Belle Isle Corp. v. MacBean, 1948, 30 Del.Ch. 373 , 61 A.2d 699 . It follows that the November 19, 1959 meeting was not validly constituted and that the various resolutions adopted at that meeting were voidable. … Kerbs v. California Eastern Airways, 33 Del. Ch. 69 , 90 A.2d 652 , 34 A.L.R.2d 839 .

In Re Grand Jury Investigation (General Motors Corp.)

174 F. Supp. 393 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 17, 1959

The corporation’s board of directors likewise work largely through several committees made up of board members and numerous corporate officers who are not directors. … Boyd v. United States, 116 U.S. 616 , 6 S.Ct. 524 , 29 L.Ed. 746 ; Hale v. Henkel, 201 U.S. 43 , 26 S.Ct. 370 , 50 L.Ed. 652 . 3 . See McMann v.

In Re Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., Securities

597 F. Supp. 2d 427 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 17, 2009

which the Merrill board rejected. … Lewis v. Ward, 852 A.2d 896, at 902 (Del.2004) (citing Kramer v. Western Pac.

Good Samaritan Hospital Regional Medical Center v. Shalala

894 F. Supp. 683 · District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 3, 1995

Ctr. v. Bowen, 795 F.2d 139 (D.C.Cir.1986), the court held that under § 1395oo (a)(l)(A)(ii) the issuance of an NPR was not a prerequisite to review of by the Board of a hospitals PPS payment. … Ass’n v.

United States v. Walker

117 F. Supp. 503 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 14, 1953

, 5 nor the Parole Board itself, 6 appears to be within the jurisdiction of this court. … United States v. Martin, D.C.S.D., 8 F.R.D. 89 , affirmed 4 Cir., 168 F.2d 1003 , certiorari denied 335 U.S. 872 , 69 S.Ct. 161 , 93 L.Ed. 416 . . Clark v. Memolo, 85 U.S.App.D.C. 65 , 174 F.2d 978 ; Gibson v. U.

REA Express, Inc. v. Brotherhood of Railway, Airline & Steamship Clerks

358 F. Supp. 760 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 11, 1973

It is of no consequence that REA’s § 6 notice was not then docketed by the Board since its proposals were considered during the negotiations. Cf. Flight Eng’rs Int’l Ass’n v. … The Board specifically noted that its action was “not to be construed as a formal resumption of jurisdiction by the Board and [was] without prejudice to the position of the parties.” 24 . See Chicago & N. W. Ry. v.

Dowgate Steamship Co. v. Arbuckle

158 F. 179 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 27, 1907

Goodrich et al. v. Norris, 10 Fed. Cas. 609 ; Smith & Co. v. Bedouin Steam Nav. Co., Ltd., Appeal Cas. 1896, p. 70. … Then only is that row broken into and *182 carried on board and the row behind is not touched until the first one has been carried, on board.

Stiegele v. Jacques Kreisler Manufacturing Corp.

213 F. Supp. 494 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 19, 1962

As was stated in Ronson Art Metal Works, Inc. v. Brown & Bigelow, Inc., 104 F. … Ronson Art Metal Works, Inc. v. Brown & Bigelow, supra; Sherman Paper Products Corp. v. Sorg Paper Co., supra; Patent Tube Corp. v. Bristol Myers Co., 25 F.Supp. 776 (D.C. S.D.N.Y.1938).

Beatty v. Snow

588 F. Supp. 809 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 18, 1984

Neither Finetti v. Harris, 609 F.2d 594 (2d Cir.1979), nor Brown v. … See Finetti, 609 F.2d at 597 ; Brown, 572 F.2d at 406 . The decision in Daye v. Attorney General of New York, 696 F.2d 186 (2d Cir.1982) (en banc), simply restates the rule of Brown v.

Bennett v. Local 456, Teamsters & Chauffeurs Union

459 F. Supp. 223 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 10, 1978

Having given the Board’s interpretation of the relevant law the deference it is due in a § 10(7) proceeding, Kaynard v. … The Board refers us to Quick Markets, Inc. v. Retail Clerks, 446 F.Supp. 733 (E.D.Mo. 1978).

Official Committee of Subordinated Bondholders v. Integrated Resources, Inc. (In Re Integrated Resources, Inc.)

147 B.R. 650 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 28, 1992

The board did not breach its duty of care. The standard under which a director’s duty of care is to be scrutinized is “gross negligence.” Aronson v. Lewis, 473 A.2d at 812 . … Corp. v.