Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.37s
United States v. One Reo Truck
25 F. Supp. 213 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 31, 1938
The sugar and the cans were invoiced to one Frank Dolo of 180 Brown Place, Buffalo, New York. … S. v. One Graham Bros. Truck, D.C., 39 F.2d 141 ; U. S. v. One Ford Truck, D.C., 46 F.2d 176 ; U. S. v. One Ford Truck, D.C., 3 F.Supp. 283 ; U. S. v. One Ford Truck, D.C., 3 F.Supp. 286 ; and U. S. v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedCorbin v. Federal Reserve Bank of New York
458 F. Supp. 143 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 6, 1978
Such relief will not affect the Board’s operations or functions and there is no need to join the Board on the notion that a superior officer is indispensable to an action against a subordinate. Williams v. … Woodbury v.
Modified on other grounds by Sol Neil Corbin v. Federal Reserve Bank Of New York, 629 F.2d 233 (1980)Cited 6 timesPublishedUnited States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters
965 F. Supp. 493 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 21, 1997
(Application XLVII of the Independent Review Board — Opinion of the Independent Review Board in the matter of Mario F. Perrucci, United States v. … See, e.g., United States v. International Bhd. of Teamsters [Sansone], 981 F.2d 1362, 1368 (2d Cir.1992); United States v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedBerman v. National Maritime Union
166 F. Supp. 327 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 18, 1958
Radio Officers Union, etc. v. National Labor Relations Board, 1954, 347 U.S. 17 , 74 S.Ct. 323, 337 , 98 L.Ed. 455 . … The discrimination, if any, which is alleged, is completely distinct from that described in §§ 8(a) (3) and 8(b) (2) of the Labor Management Relations Act, and is not cognizable by the Board. See, Syres v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedDistrict Court, S.D. New York · Sep 10, 2025
During two separate incidents in K.W.’s pre-K year, a White student made racialized remarks to K.W., telling her that her “teeth stink” and “were brown because she was brown,” and that he wanted her “to have flowers in … board districts as such board in its discretion may determine” and, “with the approval of the regents,” [T]he board of education . . .
Cited 0 timesUnknownAspen Specialty Insurance Company v. RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 20, 2023
Id. at 139 n.19; see also Brown v. … According to Defendants, the action in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania is “more comprehensive” “because it asserts a claim, in the 9 “Underlying Pennsylvania Actions” refers to D’Anna Brown, Cameron Dean v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownS. & H. Grossinger, Inc. v. Hotel & Restaurant Employees & Bartenders International
272 F. Supp. 25 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 28, 1967
Guss v. Utah Labor Relations Board, 353 U.S. 1 , 77 S.Ct. 598 , 1 L.Ed.2d 601 (1957); Amalgamated Meat Cutters, etc. v. … Under § 10, the National Labor Relations Board has exclusive power to enforce the prohibitions set forth in the Act. Linn v. United Plant Guard Workers, supra, 383 U.S. at 58 -59 n. 3, 86 S.Ct. 657 , 15 L.Ed.2d 582 .
Cited 8 timesPublishedChu Chung v. New Silver Palace Restaurant, Inc.
246 F. Supp. 2d 220 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 13, 2002
Reich v. … See Mack v.
Cited 48 timesPublishedCongregation Rabbinical College of Tartikov, Inc. v. Village of Pomona
915 F. Supp. 2d 574 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 4, 2013
See Brown v. City of Oneonta, 221 F.3d 329, 337 (2d Cir.2000) (noting that a plaintiff could “allege that a facially neutral statute or policy has an adverse effect and that it was motivated by discriminatory animus”). … referred by the Board of Trustees); (4) within 45 days of the referral or the resubmission, the Village Planning Board and the board, agency, or official to which the proposed amendment was referred shall report to the Board
Cited 48 timesPublishedHaspel v. BONNAZ, SINGER & HAND EMBROIDERERS, ETC.
112 F. Supp. 944 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 10, 1953
Amazon Cotton Mill Co. v. Textile Workers Union, 4 Cir., 167 F.2d 183 ; California Ass’n of Emp. v. Building and Const. Tr. Council, 9 Cir., 178 F.2d 175 ; International Longshoremen’s & W. U. v. Sunset L. & T. … Walker v. United Mine Workers of America, D.C.W.D.Pa., 105 F.Supp. 608 ; International Longshoremen’s & W. U. v. Sunset L. and T. Co., D.C.N.D.Cal., 77 F.Supp. 119 . See H. N. Thayer Co. v.
Cited 16 timesPublishedCarter v. Caring for the Homeless of Peekskill, Inc.
821 F. Supp. 225 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 20, 1993
See Weiss v. Opportunities for Cortland County, Inc., 40 A.D.2d 45 , 337 *228 N.Y.S.2d 409, 337 N.Y.S.2d 409 (3rd Dept. 1972). There is no evidence that this power was ever delegated by the Board to Dr. … For instance, in Neale v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedApplication of Prudential Securities Inc.
795 F. Supp. 657 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 30, 1992
Franchise Tax Board v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust 463 U.S. 1, 27-28 , 103 S.Ct. 2841, 2855-2856 , 77 L.Ed.2d 420 (1983). … The customers rely on Villarreal v. Brown Express, Inc., 529 F.2d 1219 (5th Cir.1976), for the proposition that this court must look beyond the complaint to ascertain federal question jurisdiction.
Cited 17 timesPublished683 F. Supp. 353 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 11, 1988
These cases involve challenges to the practices and procedures of the New York State Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board (“Appeal Board”). The first of these cases, Moore v. … In Blum v.
Cited 12 timesPublishedNew York SMSA Ltd. Partnership v. Town of Clarkstown
603 F. Supp. 2d 715 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 26, 2009
Trades Council v. … The Carriers find some support in a Second Circuit decision pertaining to a board’s discretion, albeit one not involving a facial challenge. In TCG New York, Inc. v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedElectronic Specialty Co. v. International Controls Corp.
296 F. Supp. 462 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 11, 1968
On that day he recommended to the board that the tender offer go forward. … See Symington Wayne Corp. v.
Cited 5 timesPublished81 F.R.D. 105 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 17, 1979
See Robertson v. Railroad Labor Board, 268 U.S. 619, 622 , 45 S.Ct. 621 , 99 L.Ed. 1119 (1925); 4 C. Wright and A. Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure § 1063, at 204 (1969). … Realty Corp. v.
Cited 45 timesPublishedBank of New York v. Meridien BIAO Bank Tanzania Ltd.
171 F.R.D. 135 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 21, 1997
Defendant Deposit Insurance Board (“DIB”) is the assignee of Meri-dien Tanzania. … Brown & Lambrecht Earth Movers, Inc., 99 F.R.D. 269, 270-72 (N.D.Ill.1983)). 11 b.
Cited 149 timesPublishedLexington Investment Co. v. Southwest Stainless, Inc.
697 F. Supp. 139 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 1, 1988
Although defendants focus on Floete and Texaco v. … In Bense v.
Cited 9 timesPublishedTeledyne Industries, Inc. v. Eon Corporation
373 F. Supp. 191 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 20, 1974
Armour and Company v. Celic, 294 F.2d 432 (2nd Cir. 1961); Hagemeyer Chemical Co. v. Insect-O-Lite Co., 291 F.2d 696 (6th Cir. 1961); Lobato v. Pay Less Drug Stores, 261 F.2d 406 (10th Cir. 1958); Lahr v. … See National Bank of New Zealand v. Finn, 81 Cal.App. 317 , 253 P. 757 (1921); Camp v. Ortega, 209 Cal.App.2d 275 , 25 Cal.Rptr. 873 (1962); Driver v.
Cited 48 timesPublished9 F. Supp. 2d 393 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 26, 1998
District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462 , 103 S.Ct. 1303 , 75 L.Ed.2d 206 (1983); Rooker v. Fidelity Trust, 263 U.S. 413 , 44 S.Ct. 149 , 68 L.Ed. 362 (1923); Gentner v. … Khal Charidim Kiryas Joel v. Village of Kiryas Joel, 935 F.Supp. 450, 455 (S.D.N.Y.1996) (citing Pennzoil Company v.
Cited 3 timesPublished
Ask Donna