Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnysd

10,000+ results

2.37s

  • United States v. One Reo Truck

    25 F. Supp. 213 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 31, 1938

    The sugar and the cans were invoiced to one Frank Dolo of 180 Brown Place, Buffalo, New York. … S. v. One Graham Bros. Truck, D.C., 39 F.2d 141 ; U. S. v. One Ford Truck, D.C., 46 F.2d 176 ; U. S. v. One Ford Truck, D.C., 3 F.Supp. 283 ; U. S. v. One Ford Truck, D.C., 3 F.Supp. 286 ; and U. S. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Corbin v. Federal Reserve Bank of New York

    458 F. Supp. 143 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 6, 1978

    Such relief will not affect the Board’s operations or functions and there is no need to join the Board on the notion that a superior officer is indispensable to an action against a subordinate. Williams v. … Woodbury v.

    Modified on other grounds by Sol Neil Corbin v. Federal Reserve Bank Of New York, 629 F.2d 233 (1980)Cited 6 timesPublished
  • United States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters

    965 F. Supp. 493 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 21, 1997

    (Application XLVII of the Independent Review Board — Opinion of the Independent Review Board in the matter of Mario F. Perrucci, United States v. … See, e.g., United States v. International Bhd. of Teamsters [Sansone], 981 F.2d 1362, 1368 (2d Cir.1992); United States v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Berman v. National Maritime Union

    166 F. Supp. 327 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 18, 1958

    Radio Officers Union, etc. v. National Labor Relations Board, 1954, 347 U.S. 17 , 74 S.Ct. 323, 337 , 98 L.Ed. 455 . … The discrimination, if any, which is alleged, is completely distinct from that described in §§ 8(a) (3) and 8(b) (2) of the Labor Management Relations Act, and is not cognizable by the Board. See, Syres v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Amos Winbush III and Tiffany Winbush, individually and on behalf of their minor children, K.W. and S.J.W. v. New York City Department of Education; Board of Education of the City School District of the City of New York; New York City Community School District 2; Maggie Siena, in her individual capacity; and Casey Corey, in her individual capacity

    District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 10, 2025

    During two separate incidents in K.W.’s pre-K year, a White student made racialized remarks to K.W., telling her that her “teeth stink” and “were brown because she was brown,” and that he wanted her “to have flowers in … board districts as such board in its discretion may determine” and, “with the approval of the regents,” [T]he board of education . . .

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Aspen Specialty Insurance Company v. RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc.

    District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 20, 2023

    Id. at 139 n.19; see also Brown v. … According to Defendants, the action in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania is “more comprehensive” “because it asserts a claim, in the 9 “Underlying Pennsylvania Actions” refers to D’Anna Brown, Cameron Dean v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • S. & H. Grossinger, Inc. v. Hotel & Restaurant Employees & Bartenders International

    272 F. Supp. 25 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 28, 1967

    Guss v. Utah Labor Relations Board, 353 U.S. 1 , 77 S.Ct. 598 , 1 L.Ed.2d 601 (1957); Amalgamated Meat Cutters, etc. v. … Under § 10, the National Labor Relations Board has exclusive power to enforce the prohibitions set forth in the Act. Linn v. United Plant Guard Workers, supra, 383 U.S. at 58 -59 n. 3, 86 S.Ct. 657 , 15 L.Ed.2d 582 .

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Chu Chung v. New Silver Palace Restaurant, Inc.

    246 F. Supp. 2d 220 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 13, 2002

    Reich v. … See Mack v.

    Cited 48 timesPublished
  • Congregation Rabbinical College of Tartikov, Inc. v. Village of Pomona

    915 F. Supp. 2d 574 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 4, 2013

    See Brown v. City of Oneonta, 221 F.3d 329, 337 (2d Cir.2000) (noting that a plaintiff could “allege that a facially neutral statute or policy has an adverse effect and that it was motivated by discriminatory animus”). … referred by the Board of Trustees); (4) within 45 days of the referral or the resubmission, the Village Planning Board and the board, agency, or official to which the proposed amendment was referred shall report to the Board

    Cited 48 timesPublished
  • Haspel v. BONNAZ, SINGER & HAND EMBROIDERERS, ETC.

    112 F. Supp. 944 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 10, 1953

    Amazon Cotton Mill Co. v. Textile Workers Union, 4 Cir., 167 F.2d 183 ; California Ass’n of Emp. v. Building and Const. Tr. Council, 9 Cir., 178 F.2d 175 ; International Longshoremen’s & W. U. v. Sunset L. & T. … Walker v. United Mine Workers of America, D.C.W.D.Pa., 105 F.Supp. 608 ; International Longshoremen’s & W. U. v. Sunset L. and T. Co., D.C.N.D.Cal., 77 F.Supp. 119 . See H. N. Thayer Co. v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Carter v. Caring for the Homeless of Peekskill, Inc.

    821 F. Supp. 225 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 20, 1993

    See Weiss v. Opportunities for Cortland County, Inc., 40 A.D.2d 45 , 337 *228 N.Y.S.2d 409, 337 N.Y.S.2d 409 (3rd Dept. 1972). There is no evidence that this power was ever delegated by the Board to Dr. … For instance, in Neale v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Application of Prudential Securities Inc.

    795 F. Supp. 657 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 30, 1992

    Franchise Tax Board v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust 463 U.S. 1, 27-28 , 103 S.Ct. 2841, 2855-2856 , 77 L.Ed.2d 420 (1983). … The customers rely on Villarreal v. Brown Express, Inc., 529 F.2d 1219 (5th Cir.1976), for the proposition that this court must look beyond the complaint to ascertain federal question jurisdiction.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Barcia v. Sitkin

    683 F. Supp. 353 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 11, 1988

    These cases involve challenges to the practices and procedures of the New York State Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board (“Appeal Board”). The first of these cases, Moore v. … In Blum v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • New York SMSA Ltd. Partnership v. Town of Clarkstown

    603 F. Supp. 2d 715 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 26, 2009

    Trades Council v. … The Carriers find some support in a Second Circuit decision pertaining to a board’s discretion, albeit one not involving a facial challenge. In TCG New York, Inc. v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Electronic Specialty Co. v. International Controls Corp.

    296 F. Supp. 462 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 11, 1968

    On that day he recommended to the board that the tender offer go forward. … See Symington Wayne Corp. v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Goldberg v. Meridor

    81 F.R.D. 105 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 17, 1979

    See Robertson v. Railroad Labor Board, 268 U.S. 619, 622 , 45 S.Ct. 621 , 99 L.Ed. 1119 (1925); 4 C. Wright and A. Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure § 1063, at 204 (1969). … Realty Corp. v.

    Cited 45 timesPublished
  • Bank of New York v. Meridien BIAO Bank Tanzania Ltd.

    171 F.R.D. 135 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 21, 1997

    Defendant Deposit Insurance Board (“DIB”) is the assignee of Meri-dien Tanzania. … Brown & Lambrecht Earth Movers, Inc., 99 F.R.D. 269, 270-72 (N.D.Ill.1983)). 11 b.

    Cited 149 timesPublished
  • Lexington Investment Co. v. Southwest Stainless, Inc.

    697 F. Supp. 139 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 1, 1988

    Although defendants focus on Floete and Texaco v. … In Bense v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Teledyne Industries, Inc. v. Eon Corporation

    373 F. Supp. 191 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 20, 1974

    Armour and Company v. Celic, 294 F.2d 432 (2nd Cir. 1961); Hagemeyer Chemical Co. v. Insect-O-Lite Co., 291 F.2d 696 (6th Cir. 1961); Lobato v. Pay Less Drug Stores, 261 F.2d 406 (10th Cir. 1958); Lahr v. … See National Bank of New Zealand v. Finn, 81 Cal.App. 317 , 253 P. 757 (1921); Camp v. Ortega, 209 Cal.App.2d 275 , 25 Cal.Rptr. 873 (1962); Driver v.

    Cited 48 timesPublished
  • Jessen v. Cavanaugh

    9 F. Supp. 2d 393 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 26, 1998

    District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462 , 103 S.Ct. 1303 , 75 L.Ed.2d 206 (1983); Rooker v. Fidelity Trust, 263 U.S. 413 , 44 S.Ct. 149 , 68 L.Ed. 362 (1923); Gentner v. … Khal Charidim Kiryas Joel v. Village of Kiryas Joel, 935 F.Supp. 450, 455 (S.D.N.Y.1996) (citing Pennzoil Company v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.