Case law

Boyce v. New York City Mission Society

963 F. Supp. 290 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 5, 1997

Sheehan (“Sheehan”), Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Mission Society, and the Board of Directors of the Mission Society (the “Board”). (Id. ¶¶ 7, 8, 11.) … The letter also indicated that the Board of Trustees or the Board had conducted a thorough investigation of Boyce’s allegations. (Id. ¶ 21.)

Krasner v. HSH NORDBANK AG

680 F. Supp. 2d 502 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 7, 2010

Brown, 257 F.3d at 252 , citing Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Servs., Inc., 523 U.S. 75, 79-80 , 118 S.Ct. 998 , 140 L.Ed.2d 201 *514 (1998); accord, Alfano v. … Brown, 257 F.3d at 252.

Nation v. Esperdy

239 F. Supp. 531 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 19, 1965

Holding that such a child is a stepchild, e. g., Larsen v. Harris Structural Steel Co., 230 App.Div. 280 , 243 N.Y.S. pp. 654 (3d Dep’t 1930); Hernandez v. … Union v. Proctor & Gamble Mfg. Co., 312 F.2d 181, 190 (2d Cir. 1962); Local 33, Int’l Hod Carriers v.

King World Productions, Inc. v. Financial News Network, Inc.

660 F. Supp. 1381 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 15, 1987

The existence of this document, unsupported by any minutes indicating adoption of the alleged policy by the Board of Directors, is inadequate to refute the evidence of the actual practices of FNN’s officers and Board as outlined … Connor v. Smith, 527 F.2d 702, 705 (2d Cir.1975); United States v. Beekman, 155 F.2d 580, 584 (2d Cir.1946). 8 . Scholle v. Cuban-Venezuelan Oil Voting Trust, 285 F.2d 318, 320 (2d Cir.1960); Reprosystem, B.V. v.

GST Telecommunications, Inc. v. Irwin

192 F.R.D. 109 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 7, 2000

to restrain the votes and directions of the Board. … See United States v.

Macy v. Browne

215 F. 456 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 13, 1914

The conclusion that the matter in dispute is one of discretion leads me to dispose of this case by a reference to the recent decision of the Supreme Court in State of Louisiana v. McAdoo, 234 U. S. 627 , 34 Sup. … The effect of that proven truth is for the tea board, not this court. Bill dismissed.

Buffalo Teachers Federation, Inc. v. Helsby

515 F. Supp. 215 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 18, 1981

Vance v. Bradley, 440 U.S. 93, 97 , 99 S.Ct. 939, 943 , 59 L.Ed.2d 171 (1979) (quoting Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. … Finkel v. New York City Board of Education, 474 F.Supp. 468, 471 (E.D.N.Y.1979), aff’d mem.; 622 F.2d 573 (2d Cir. 1980).

United States v. City of Yonkers

880 F. Supp. 212 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 27, 1995

See, e.g., United States v. Fordice, -U .S.-,-,-, 112 S.Ct. 2727, 2735, 2737 , 120 L.Ed.2d 575 (1992); Columbus Board of Educ. v. … See Palmer v. Board of Educ., 46 F.3d 682, 685 (7th Cir.1995) (Easterbrook, J.).

Celebrity Cruises, Inc. v. Essef Corp.

434 F. Supp. 2d 169 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 12, 2006

Browning in support of its Daubert motion to exclude the testimony of Essefs experts. (Declaration of Bryan H. Browning dated Feb. 1, 2006 (“Browning Decl.”); Declaration of Bryan H. … Ruffin v. Shaw Industries, Inc., 149 F.3d 294, 297 (4th Cir.1998). Thus, I need not determine whether Mr. Browning’s evidence would be independently admissible under DaubeH.

Nurnberg v. Froehlke

355 F. Supp. 1187 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 9, 1973

In Crotty v. … Evaluation of the Decision of the Conscientious Objector Review Board In Lovallo v.

Fox v. Reich & Tang, Inc.

94 F.R.D. 94 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 29, 1982

Fox correctly states that a Section 36(b) suit cannot be terminated by the Fund’s board of directors. Burks v. … State Teachers Retirement Board v. Fluor Corp., 654 F.2d *99 843, 856 (2d Cir. 1981). In the instant case, prejudice to the directors would result from plaintiff’s dilatory amendment.

Bernstein v. N. V. Nederlandsche-Amerikaansche Stoomvaart-Maatschappij

15 F.R.D. 32 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 20, 1953

Kaufman has held, in Campbell v. General Motors Corp., D.C.S. … Van Der Vorm is chairman of the board of directors or commissaris of Holland-America.

Kozera v. Westchester Fairfield Chapter of National Electrical Contractors Ass'n, Local 501

714 F. Supp. 644 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 30, 1989

knowledge of the executive board. … See Van Ness Townhouses v.

Scaglione v. Chappaqua Central School District

209 F. Supp. 2d 311 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 11, 2002

In Dumas v. Town of Mount Vernon, 612 F.2d 974 (5th Cir.1980), the plaintiff, a black female, sued the Mobile County Personnel Board, claiming that the Board had discriminated against her in violation of Title VII. … In Hill v.

Lynch v. Consolidated Rail Corp.

439 F. Supp. 110 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 1, 1977

See Ryan v. City of New York, 7 A.D.2d 298 , 182 N.Y.2d 616 (1st Dept. 1959), aff’d 6 N.Y.2d 896 , 190 N.Y.S.2d 705 , 160 N.E.2d 924 (1959); Cross v. … Murray, as Receiver, 260 App.Div. 1030 , 24 N.Y.2d 500 (2d Dept. 1940); Angrisani v. New York Central R. R., 22 A.D.2d 666 , c. 7, 253 N.Y.S.2d 403 (1st Dept. 1964); Pilch v. Pennsylvania R. R.

Birmingham v. Sogen-Swiss International Corp. Retirement Plan

529 F. Supp. 86 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 21, 1981

Given that the acknowledged purpose of this section is the protection of employees, see McClintock-Trunkey Co. v. C.I.R., 217 F.2d 329 (9th Cir. 1954); U. S. v. … Central States Southeast v. Hitchings Trucking, 492 F.Supp. 906, 909 (E.D.Mich.1980); cf. Fase v.

The Buena Ventura

243 F. 797 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 28, 1916

of the arrangement under which they are on board.” … United States v. Thompson, 1 Sumn. 168 , Fed. Cas. No. 16,492. See, also. The Mary Elizabeth (C. C.) 24 Fed. 397 . This court has even decided that a bartender may rank as a seaman, in The J. S. Warden (D.

Pryor v. Regan

360 F. Supp. 103 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 22, 1973

The Parole Board lodged a warrant against him on December 9, 1970. … Menechino v. Warden, 27 N.Y.2d 376 , 318 N.Y.S.2d 449 , 267 N.E.2d 238 (1971), that, after Mempa v.

Chunk

139 F. 747 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 5, 1905

It is claimed that the statute does not cpver such items and reference is made to Dalton v. South Eastern Ry. Co., 4 C. B. (N. S.) 296; Boulter v. Webster, 13 Weekly Reptr. 289; Holland v. Brown (D. … Judge Brown there said (702, 703) : “3.

United States v. Munoz

748 F. Supp. 167 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 4, 1990

See also New York v. … In support of his claim to the contrary, the defendant cites United States v. Brown, 557 F.2d 541 (6th Cir.1977), which is distinguishable on the facts.